Cited by 21Physical Activity and HealthImpact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital Technology

Television viewing and its association with sedentary behaviors, self-rated health and academic performance among secondary school students in Peru.

Open access
Sharma, Bimala, Cosme Chavez, Rosemary, Jeong, Ae, Nam, Eun·2017·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The study assessed television viewing >2 h a day and its association with sedentary behaviors, self-rated health, and academic performance among secondary school adolescents. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among randomly selected students in Lima in 2015. We measured self-reported responses of students using a standard questionnaire, and conducted in-depth interviews with 10 parents and 10 teachers. Chi-square test, correlation and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed among 1234 students, and thematic analysis technique was used for qualitative information. A total of 23.1% adolescents reported watching television >2 h a day. Qualitative findings also show that adolescents spend most of their leisure time watching television, playing video games or using the Internet. Television viewing had a significant positive correlation with video game use in males and older adolescents, with Internet use in both sexes, and a negative correlation with self-rated health and academic performance in females. Multivariate logistic regression analysis shows that television viewing >2 h a day, independent of physical activity was associated with video games use >2 h a day, Internet use >2 h a day, poor/fair self-rated health and poor self-reported academic performance. Television viewing time and sex had a significant interaction effect on both video game use >2 h a day and Internet use >2 h a day. Reducing television viewing time may be an effective strategy for improving health and academic performance in adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph14040383

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our results concur with previous research showing an inverse association of television viewing with composite scores, language, and mathematics.

    “Regarding the association between the duration of individual screen-based activities and academic performance, our results concur with previous research showing an inverse association of television viewing with composite scores, 29,64,66,71 language, 59,67 and mathematics.59,77”

    From Association Between Screen Media Use and Academic Performance Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Results (section 3.1; page unavailable) report a negative correlation between television viewing and self-reported academic performance among secondary school students in Peru. But the Methods (section 2.2.2; page unavailable) show that performance was measured with a single self-rating question, not a composite score. The language and mathematics findings have separate citations in the citing sentence and are not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, B., Cosme Chavez, R., Jeong, A., & Nam, E.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Yonsei Global Health Center, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea
  • Cheongju University (KR)
Corresponding author
Nam, Eun
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-04-05
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
383
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604370874
Cited by
21
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Korea International Cooperation Agency (P2013-00151-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
television viewing, sedentary behavior, self-rated health, academic performance, high school students, adolescents, video game use, internet use, leisure, sex differences, Lima
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Peru, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Social Environment, Students, Television, Time Factors, Exercise, Chi-Square Distribution, Video Games, Internet, Sedentary Behavior, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review