Cited by 8Injury Epidemiology and PreventionBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionChildren's Physical and Motor Development

Effects of Fall Training Program on Automatization of Safe Motor Responses during Backwards Falls in School-Age Children

Open access
DelCastillo-Andrés, Óscar, Toronjo-Hornillo, Luis, Toronjo-Urquiza, Luis·2019·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

A significant number of children suffer injuries from falls. The current measures of prevention and education regarding falls are not sufficient, as falling is still the main cause of injury at this age. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of injury during a backward fall and assess the effect of the Safe Fall training program on this risk. 457 primary school children between the ages of 6 and 12 (mean age of 9) were enrolled in a 6-week randomized intervention. The program was carried out during physical education classes and consisted of an intervention group that followed the Safe Fall training program and a control group that was given equilibrium exercises. The risk of injury was assessed before and after the implementation using the Information Scale on Safe Ways of Falling observation scale, evaluating the responses of five different body parts (head, hip, knees, upper limbs and back). Students’ natural response to falls was associated with a high risk of injury in more than 90% of the cases. The implementation of the Safe Fall program resulted in a considerable decrease in this risk, with percentages lowered to levels between 8.7% and 18.3%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph16214078

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • School-based prevention relies heavily on subjective observation rather than objective biomechanical assessment.

    “While clinically valid, manual observation is subjective, labour-intensive, and unscalable for large student populations.”

    From Safe Fall: Use of Predictive Modeling and Machine Vision Techniques for Fall Analysis and Fall Quality (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    Methods §2.5 describes an observer scoring children’s fall responses with an observation scale, so the paper supports the use of manual observation in this school-based study. It does not say that school-based prevention relies heavily on that approach or assess whether observation is subjective, labour-intensive, or unscalable compared with biomechanical assessment. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Current validation relies on the INFOSECA observation scale, a clinical instrument that evaluates five biomechanical criteria.

    “Current validation relies on the INFOSECA observation scale, a clinical instrument that evaluates five biomechanical criteria (e.g., head protection, trunk rolling) [2].”

    From Safe Fall: Use of Predictive Modeling and Machine Vision Techniques for Fall Analysis and Fall Quality (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    Section 2.5 (page unavailable) says the study used an observation scale to score fall responses in five body parts, including head and back. It does not describe the scale as a clinical instrument or establish that current validation relies on it; its back criterion is landing on a flat back, not trunk rolling. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This mechanism converts potentially injurious vertical energy into horizontal rotational motion, protecting the spine and head from direct impact.

    “This mechanism converts potentially injurious vertical energy into horizontal rotational motion, protecting the spine and head from direct impact [2].”

    From Safe Fall: Use of Predictive Modeling and Machine Vision Techniques for Fall Analysis and Fall Quality (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says that rolling over and other falling techniques reduce impact. Methods §2.5 (page not provided) identifies poor head control and landing on a flat back as potentially harmful. The paper does not describe converting vertical energy into horizontal rotational motion or establish that mechanism as the reason the head and spine avoid direct impact. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These dramatic increases reflect the acquisition of a decisive and coordinated protective strategy: children learned to expand their body horizontally (rolling) and commit to the descent rapidly (squatting) to dissipate energy, rather than freezing in an upright position.

    “These dramatic increases reflect the acquisition of a decisive and coordinated protective strategy: children learned to expand their body horizontally (rolling) and commit to the descent rapidly (squatting) to dissipate energy, rather than freezing in an upright position [2].”

    From Safe Fall: Use of Predictive Modeling and Machine Vision Techniques for Fall Analysis and Fall Quality (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These findings provide data-driven validation of the Safe Fall pedagogical approach: the intervention successfully overwrites the natural instinct to stiffen and resist gravity with a trained motor program characterised by decisive entry and spatial expansion.

    “These findings provide data-driven validation of the Safe Fall pedagogical approach: the intervention successfully overwrites the natural instinct to stiffen and resist gravity with a trained motor program characterised by decisive entry and spatial expansion [2].”

    From Safe Fall: Use of Predictive Modeling and Machine Vision Techniques for Fall Analysis and Fall Quality (2026) · cites this paper as [2]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 8

Authors
DelCastillo-Andrés, Ó., Toronjo-Hornillo, L., & Toronjo-Urquiza, L.
Affiliations
  • Departamento de Educación Física y Deporte, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Pirotecnia s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
  • Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
  • Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-10-23
Volume
16
Issue
21
Pages
4078
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981716566
Cited by
8
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
backward falls, fall injury prevention, elementary school students, injury risk, physical education, traumatic brain injury, knee injury, injury prevention education
MeSH terms
Accident Prevention, Accidental Falls, Child, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Motor Skills, Physical Education and Training, Wounds and Injuries, Single-Blind Method, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review