Cited by 46Ocular and Laser Science ResearchSkin Protection and AgingOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Balance between Health Risks and Benefits for Outdoor Workers Exposed to Solar Radiation: An Overview on the Role of Near Infrared Radiation Alone and in Combination with Other Solar Spectral Bands

Open access
Grandi, Carlo, D’Ovidio, Maria Concetta·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Near infrared or infrared A (IRA) accounts for over 40% of the solar spectrum (SS) and is able to reach subcutaneous tissue as well as the retina. Outdoor workers are occupationally exposed to solar radiation (SR), but the level of exposure may differ widely depending on the job performed, time spent outdoors, latitude, altitude, season, personal protection, etc. Until now, risk assessment and management for outdoor workers has focused on the prevention of both acute and long-term effects on the eye and the skin due to solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) with little consideration of the other components of the SS (a possible exception is represented by visible radiation with reference to the eye). A growing body of evidence coming from in vitro studies indicates that IRA is involved in cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and may interfere with the respiratory chain in the mitochondria. Moreover, it can modulate gene expression and some metabolic pathways. The biological action of IRA is only partly attributable to a thermal mechanism, should it be also involved in photochemical ones. The cellular and molecular pathways affected by IRA are partly similar and partly different with respect to those involved in the case of visible ultraviolet A (UVA) and ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation. Consequently, the net effect of the SS is very difficult to predict at different levels of the biological organization, making more difficult the final balance of health risk and benefits (for the skin, eye, immune system, blood pressure, etc.) in a given exposure situation. Moreover, few in vivo studies and no epidemiological data are presently available in this regard. Investigating this topic may contribute to better defining the individual exposome. More practically, it is expected to bring benefits to the risk assessment and management for outdoor workers exposed to SS, contributing to: (1) better definition of the individual profiles of susceptibility, (2) more focused preventive and protective measures, (3) better implementation of the health surveillance and (4) a more effective information and training.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17041357

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is abundant evidence that ultraviolet radiation is carcinogenic to humans, and it forms the major driver of other underlying medical conditions ranging from eye defects, sunburn, skin disorder and hair damage.

    “Generally, there is abundant evidence that ultraviolet radiation is carcinogenic to humans, and it forms the major driver of other underlying medical conditions ranging from eye defects, sunburn, skin disorder and hair damage”

    From Skin protection from solar ultraviolet radiation using natural compounds: a review (2024) · cites this paper as Grandi & D'Ovidio 2020

    Section 2 (page unavailable) identifies melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers among the best-known long-term effects of solar radiation and says effects on the skin and eyes are mostly attributed to UVA and UVB. It does not substantiate the full list in the claim: searches for sunburn and hair damage found no passage attributing those effects to UV radiation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 114 · Cited by 46

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) A Review of Human Carcinogens, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 100 D-Radiation IARC Lyon, French 2012 Available online: http://publications.iarc.fr/121 (accessed on 12 November 2019)
  2. [3]Kochevar I.E. Pathak M.A. Parrish J.A. Photophysics, photochemistry and photobiology Dermatology in General Medicine Fitzpatrick McGraw-Hill New York, NY, USA 1999 220 229
  3. [29]Kettelhut E.A. Traylor J. Roach J.P. Erythema Ab Igne; Bookshelf, 2019 Bookshelf ID: NBK538250PMID:30855838 Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538250/ (accessed on 19 November 2019)

Authors
Grandi, C., & D’Ovidio, M. C.
Affiliations
Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro (IT)
Corresponding author
Grandi, Carlo
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-02-20
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
1357
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008773849
Cited by
46
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular and Laser Science Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
near-infrared light, solar radiation, occupational exposure, outdoor workers, reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial respiratory chain, gene expression modulation, ultraviolet radiation, exposome, risk assessment, health surveillance, protective measures
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infrared Rays, Male, Sunlight, Ultraviolet Rays, Occupational Exposure, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review