Cited by 25Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics in medical practice

Decision-Making Processes in Surrogates of Cancer Patients in a Taiwan Intensive Care Unit

Open access
Sun, Wan-Na, Hsu, Hsin-Tien, Ko, Nai-Ying, Huang, Yu-Tung·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Background: Few studies in Asian countries have explored the emotional entanglements and conflicts that surrogates often experience during the medical decision-making process. This study was to explore decision-making processes in surrogates of cancer patients in a Taiwan intensive care unit (ICU). This qualitative study surveyed a purposive sample of surrogates (n = 8; average age, 48 years) of cancer patients in the ICU of a medical center in Taiwan. A phenomenological methodology was used, and a purposive sample of surrogates of cancer patients were recruited and interviewed during the first three days of the ICU stay. Results: Based on the interview results, four themes were generalized through text progression: (1) Use love to resist: internal angst. This theme was related to the reflexive self -blame, the feelings of inner conflict, and the reluctance to make healthcare decisions, which surrogates experienced when they perceived suffering by the patient. (2) Allow an angel to spread love among us: memories and emotional entanglements. Memories of the patient caused the surrogate to experience emotional entanglements ranging from happiness to sadness and from cheerfulness to anger. (3) Dilemmas of love: anxiety about ICU visitor restrictions. The confined space and restricted visiting hours of the ICU limited the ability of surrogates to provide emotional support and to share their emotions with the patient. (4) Suffocating love: entanglement in decision-making. Emotional entanglements among family members with different opinions on medical care and their struggles to influence decision-making often prevented surrogates from thinking logically. Conclusions: Expression of emotions by ICU surrogates is often restrained and implicit, particularly in Asian populations. These results can help health professionals understand the psychological shock and inner conflict experienced by surrogates and provide a useful reference for improving their communications with surrogates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17124443

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insufficient comprehension of ECMO's potential benefits, risks, complications, and prognosis can heighten uncertainty and anxiety.

    “Insufficient comprehension of ECMO’s potential benefits, risks, complications, and prognosis can heighten uncertainty and anxiety34.”

    From Decisional conflict among Chinese family caregivers prior to ECMO initiation: a cross-sectional study (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Results (§§3.3–3.4; page not provided) describe limited medical understanding, uncertainty about treatment outcomes, and surrogates’ distress and fear. The paper does not address ECMO or link comprehension of its specific benefits, risks, complications, and prognosis to heightened uncertainty and anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [8]Yang C.L. Chen C.Y. Hu W.Y. Advance Directives Hosp. Care Mag. 2008 13 30 41 10.6537/tjhpc.2008.13(1).3 · DOI
  2. [9]Tsai D.F. Pan H.C. Wu T.M. Chiu T.Y. Huang T.S. The Ethical-legal Issues in Advance Care Planning Form. J. Med. 2006 10 517 536 10.6320/fjm.2006.10(4).15 · DOI
  3. [20]Chen S.P. Tseng F.L. Huang K.S. Shih C.Y. Chou M.C. Chiang M.C. Respect for Life—Brief Introduction of Patient Right to Autonomy Chang. Gung. Nurs. 2019 30 466 473 10.6386/cgn.201912_30(4).0004 · DOI
  4. [21]Denzin N.K. Lincoln Y.S. Handbook of Qualitative Research SAGE Thousand Oaks, CA, USA 2005
  5. [25]Chen X.J. Application of phenomenology in nursing research New Taipei Nurs. J. 2000 2 117 123 10.6540/ntjn.2000.2.011 · DOI
  6. [30]Hsu Y.C. Ma F.C. Lin L.C. Liu L.F. Stress Perceptions and Coping Strategies of Family Members of Emergency Department Patients Nurs. Health Care Res. 2009 5 201 210 10.6225/jnhr.5.3.201 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, W.-N., Hsu, H.-T., Ko, N.-Y., & Huang, Y.-T.
Affiliations
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Hsu, Hsin-Tien
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-06-20
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
4443
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036849100
Cited by
23
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST-108-2635-B-037-007)
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH-10607004)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
surrogate decision-making, cancer patients, intensive care unit, family caregivers, emotional entanglement, self-blame, family conflict, emotional restraint, Asian populations
MeSH terms
Adult, Asia, Decision Making, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Taiwan, Proxy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review