Cited by 45Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CarePain Management and Opioid Use

Where do cancer patients in receipt of home-based palliative care prefer to die and what are the determinants of a preference for a home death?

Open access
Cai, Jiaoli, Zhang, Li, Guerriere, Denise, Fan, Hongli, Coyte, Peter C.·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Understanding the preferred place of death may assist to organize and deliver palliative health care services. The study aims to assess preference for place of death among cancer patients in receipt of home-based palliative care, and to determine the variables that affect their preference for a home death. A prospective cohort design was carried out from July 2010 to August 2012. Over the course of their palliative care trajectory, a total of 303 family caregivers of cancer patients were interviewed. Multivariate regression analysis was employed to assess the determinants of a preferred home death. The majority (65%) of patients had a preference of home death. The intensity of home-based physician visits and home-based personal support worker (PSW) care promotes a preference for a home death. Married patients, patients receiving post-graduate education and patients with higher Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) scores were more likely to have a preference of home death. Patients reduced the likelihood of preferring a home death when their family caregiver had high burden. This study suggests that the majority of cancer patients have a preference of home death. Health mangers and policy makers have the potential to develop policies that facilitate those preferences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph18010235

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many patients with terminal cancer and their families prefer palliative care at home rather than in a health-care facility.

    “many patients with terminal cancer and their families prefer palliative care delivered at home versus a health-care facility.153”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, J., Zhang, L., Guerriere, D., Fan, H., & Coyte, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Jiaotong University (CN)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Shandong University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Corresponding author
Fan, Hongli
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-12-30
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
235
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3113426853
Cited by
45
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (74722, PHE-101530, and HPM-303157)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71904011)
  • National Social Science Fund of China (19CSH073)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
place of death, home death, home-based palliative care, cancer patients, patient preferences, family caregivers, caregiver burden, Palliative Performance Scale, physician home visits, marital status, educational attainment
MeSH terms
Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Prospective Studies, Caregivers, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review