CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hybrid Tele and In-Clinic Occupation Based Intervention to Improve Women’s Daily Participation after Breast Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Loubani, Khawla, Kizony, Rachel, Milman, Uzi, Schreuer, Naomi·2021·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
DOI 10.3390/ijerph18115966
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Women after breast cancer (BC) cope with decreased daily participation and quality of life (QOL) due to physical, cognitive, and emotional symptoms. This study examined a hybrid occupation-based intervention, Managing Participation with Breast Cancer (MaP-BC), to improve daily participation in their meaningful activities. Methods: Thirty-five women after BC phase were randomly allocated to the MaP-BC intervention (n = 18) or control (n = 17) group (standard care only). Assessments were administered at baseline (T1), 6-week (T2), and 12-week (T3) post-T1. Main outcome: perceived performance and performance-satisfaction with meaningful activities according to the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Secondary outcomes: retained activity levels (Activity Card Sort), QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast), cognitive abilities (Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function), and upper-extremity functioning (Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand). Results showed significant interaction (group x time) effects for the primary outcome in performance, F(2,66) = 29.54, p = 0.001, ɳP2 = 0.472, and satisfaction, F(2,66) = 37.15, p = 0.000, ɳP2 = 0.530. The intervention group improved more in performance, t = 5.51, p = 0.0001, d = 1.298, and satisfaction, t = −5.32, p = 0.0001, d = 1.254, than the control group between T1 and T2. Secondary outcomes demonstrated within-group improvements. Conclusion: MaP-BC, a comprehensive occupation-based hybrid intervention tailored to women’s functional daily needs after BC, improved participation in meaningful activities within a short period.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph18115966

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Keesing, 2018, Identifying the contribution of occupational therapy in meeting the needs of women survivors of breast cancer, Br. J. Occup. Ther., 81, 402, 10.1177/0308022618762080 · DOI
  2. Schreuer, 2016, Participation in Daily Activities among Working Women Following Breast Cancer, Open J. Ther. Rehabil., 4, 150, 10.4236/ojtr.2016.43014 · DOI
  3. Seifart, 2014, Quality of life in cancer rehabilitation: The role of life goal adjustment, Psycho-Oncology, 23, 1149, 10.1002/pon.3538 · DOI
  4. Sleight, 2016, Toward a Broader Role for Occupational Therapy in Supportive Oncology Care, Am. J. Occup. Ther., 70, 7004360030, 10.5014/ajot.2016.018101 · DOI
  5. Eakman, 2012, The Relative Impact of Personality Traits, Meaningful Occupation and Occupational Value on Meaning in Life and Life Satisfaction, J. Occup. Sci., 19, 165, 10.1080/14427591.2012.671762 · DOI
  6. Hack, 2010, Predictors of arm morbidity following breast cancer surgery, Psycho-Oncology, 19, 1205, 10.1002/pon.1685 · DOI
  7. Nelson, 2007, Chemotherapy and cognitive deficits: Mechanisms, findings, and potential interventions, Palliat. Support. Care, 5, 273, 10.1017/S1478951507000442 · DOI
  8. Selamat, M.H., Loh, S.Y., MacKenzie, L., and Vardy, J. (2014). Chemobrain Experienced by Breast Cancer Survivors: A Meta-Ethnography Study Investigating Research and Care Implications. PLoS ONE, 9. · DOI
  9. Tsaras, 2018, Assessment of depression and anxiety in breast cancer patients: Prevalence and associated factors, Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 19, 1661
  10. Woodgate, 2017, The psychosocial experiences of women with breast cancer across the lifespan: A systematic review, Psycho-Oncology, 26, 1711, 10.1002/pon.4281 · DOI
  11. Yuen, 2007, Actions and personal attributes of community-dwelling older adults to maintain independence, Phys. Occup. Ther. Geriatr., 25, 35, 10.1080/J148v25n03_03 · DOI
  12. Penttinen, 2011, Quality of life and physical performance and activity of breast cancer patients after adjuvant treatments, Psycho-Oncology, 20, 1211, 10.1002/pon.1837 · DOI
  13. Pergolotti, 2016, Occupational Therapy for Adults with Cancer: Why It Matters, Oncologist, 21, 314, 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0335 · DOI
  14. Kielhofner, G. (2008). Model of Human Occupation: Theory and Application, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [4th ed.].
  15. Baxter, 2017, Occupational Therapy’s Role in Cancer Survivorship as a Chronic Condition, Am. J. Occup. Ther., 71, 1, 10.5014/ajot.2017.713001 · DOI
  16. Hegel, 2011, Feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial of a telephone-delivered problem-solving-occupational therapy intervention to reduce participation restrictions in rural breast cancer survivors undergoing chemotherapy, Psycho-Oncology, 20, 1092, 10.1002/pon.1830 · DOI
  17. Loubani, K., Schreuer, N., and Kizony, R. (2021). Participation in Daily Activities among Women Five Years Following Breast cancer. Am. J. Occup. Ther., 76, In Press. · DOI
  18. Loring, 2003, Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms, Ann. Behav. Med., 26, 1, 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Nolte, 2017, Implementing person centred approaches, BMJ, 358, j4126, 10.1136/bmj.j4126 · DOI
  20. Gebbia, 2011, Cancer patient-centered home care: A new model for health care in oncology, Ther. Clin. Risk Manag., 7, 387, 10.2147/TCRM.S22119 · DOI
  21. Lyons, 2015, A Content Analysis of Functional Recovery Strategies of Breast Cancer Survivors, Occup. Particip. Health, 35, 73, 10.1177/1539449214567306 · DOI
  22. Newman, 2019, Feasibility, acceptability and potential effectiveness of an occupation-focused cognitive self-management program for breast cancer survivors, Br. J. Occup. Ther., 82, 604, 10.1177/0308022619861893 · DOI
  23. Jakobsen, 2018, Everyday life in breast cancer survivors experiencing challenges: A qualitative study, Scand. J. Occup. Ther., 25, 298, 10.1080/11038128.2017.1335777 · DOI
  24. Katz, N., and Toglia, J. (2018). The dynamic interactional model and the metacontext approach. Cognition, Occupation and Participation across the Life Span, AOTA Press. [4th ed.].
  25. Rogante, 2010, Ten years of telerehabilitation: A literature overview of technologies and clinical applications, Neurorehabilition, 27, 287, 10.3233/NRE-2010-0612 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Brennan, 2010, A Blueprint for Telerehabilitation Guidelines, Int. J. Telerehabil., 2, 31, 10.5195/ijt.2010.6063 · DOI
  27. Luiselli, J.K., and Fischer, A.J. (2016). Chapter 13—Legal, Regulatory, and Ethical Issues in Telehealth Tech-nology. Computer-Assisted and Web-Based Innovations in Psychology, Special Education, and Health, Academic Press.
  28. Kizony, 2017, Tele-rehabilitation service delivery journey from prototype to robust in-home use, Disabil. Rehabil., 39, 1532, 10.1080/09638288.2016.1250827 · DOI
  29. Lambert, G., Alos, N., Bernier, P., Laverdière, C., Drummond, K., Dahan-Oliel, N., Lemay, M., Veilleux, L.N., and Kairy, D. (2021). Patient and Parent Experiences with Group Telerehabilitation for Child Survivors of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18. · DOI
  30. Faul, 2009, Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses, Behav. Res. Methods, 41, 1149, 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Kizony, R., Weiss, P.L., Feldman, Y., Shani, M., Elion, O., Harel, S., and Baum-Cohen, I. (2013, January 26–29). Evaluation of a Tele-Health System for upper extremity stroke rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR), Philadelphia, PA, USA. · DOI
  32. Law, 1990, The Canadian occupational performance measure: An outcome measure for occupational therapy, Can. J. Occup. Ther., 57, 82, 10.1177/000841749005700207 · DOI
  33. Carswell, 2004, The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A Research and Clinical Literature Review, Can. J. Occup. Ther., 71, 210, 10.1177/000841740407100406 · DOI
  34. Eyssen, 2011, Responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 48, 517, 10.1682/JRRD.2010.06.0110 · DOI
  35. Sturkenboom, 2014, Efficacy of occupational therapy for patients with Parkinson’s disease: A randomised controlled trial, Lancet Neurol., 13, 557, 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70055-9 · DOI
  36. Sachs, 2003, The Activity Card Sort: A Factor Analysis, OTJR, 23, 165
  37. Leblanc, 2014, Validation of QuickDASH Outcome Measure in Breast Cancer Survivors for Upper Extremity Disability, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 95, 493, 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.016 · DOI
  38. Mathiowetz, 1984, Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations, J. Hand Surg., 9, 222, 10.1016/S0363-5023(84)80146-X · DOI
  39. Savva, 2014, Test-Retest Reliability of Handgrip Strength Measurement Using a Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy, J. Manip. Physiol. Ther., 37, 206, 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.02.001 · DOI
  40. Nasreddine, 2005, The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA): A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment, J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., 53, 695, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · DOI · Paper page
  41. Baxter, 2011, Identification of Mild Cognitive Impairments in Cancer Survivors, Occup. Ther. Health Care, 25, 26, 10.3109/07380577.2010.533251 · DOI
  42. Roth, R.M., and Gioia, G.A. (2005). Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function—Adult Version, Psychological Assessment Resources. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Hahn, 2016, Health-related quality of life among women with ductal carcinomain situor early invasive breast cancer: Validation of the FACT-B (version 4), Expert Rev. Qual. Life Cancer Care, 1, 99, 10.1080/23809000.2016.1134259 · DOI
  44. Brody, T. (2016). Clinical Trials: Study Design, Endpoints and Biomarkers, Drug Safety, and FDA and ICH Guidelines, Academic Press. · DOI
  45. Fritz, 2012, “Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation”: Correction to Fritz et al, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 141, 30, 10.1037/a0026092 · DOI
  46. Miles, J., and Shevlin, M. (2001). Applying Regression and Correlation: A Guide for Students and Researchers, SAGE.
  47. Lahart, 2018, Physical activity for women with breast cancer after adjuvant therapy, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 1, CD011292
  48. Speck, 2012, Scope of symptoms and self-management strategies for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients, Support. Care Cancer, 20, 2433, 10.1007/s00520-011-1365-8 · DOI
  49. Nijjar, 2017, Participation in clinical trials improves outcomes in women’s health: A systematic review and meta-analysis, BJOG, 124, 863, 10.1111/1471-0528.14528 · DOI
  50. Ferre, 2012, The financial crisis in Italy: Implications for the healthcare sector, Health Policy, 106, 10, 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.04.003 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Loubani, K., Kizony, R., Milman, U., & Schreuer, N.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-06-02
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
5966
ISSN
1660-4601
DOI
10.3390/ijerph18115966
Cited by
24
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
Israel Cancer Association (20190109)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybrid Tele and In-Clinic Occupation Based Intervention to Improve Women’s Daily Participation after Breast Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijerph18115966
The paper
Loubani, K., Kizony, R., Milman, U., & Schreuer, N. (2021). Hybrid Tele and In-Clinic Occupation Based Intervention to Improve Women’s Daily Participation after Breast Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115966