Cited by 22Child Development and Digital TechnologyChild Abuse and TraumaImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Problematic Media Use: Perceptions of Caregivers of High-Risk Youth

Open access
Domoff, Sarah E., Borgen, Aubrey L., Wilke, Nicole, Hiles Howard, Amanda·2021·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Youth with a history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are more likely to develop risky health behaviors. With the increase of media use in the general population, it is likely that these high-risk youth are developing maladaptive behaviors associated with media use (i.e., problematic media use). The goals of this article are (1) to describe symptoms of problematic media use in high-risk youth and (2) to determine whether ACEs are related to problematic media use in this population. Data were collected through online questionnaires from 348 parents or legal guardians of children ages 5 to 18 years, the majority of whom had been adopted. Parents and guardians reported on the child’s history of ACEs and completed the Problematic Media Use Measure-Short Form (PMUM-SF). Almost half of the participants reported that their child had a history of four or more ACEs (48.9%). Caregivers of foster or adopted children reported more symptoms of problematic media use than those reporting on their biological children. After adjusting for covariates, the number of ACEs predicted problematic media use above and beyond variance explained by demographic factors or screen time amount. Children with a history of ACEs had higher problematic media use compared to children without ACEs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph18136725

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General early adversity is linked to challenges with executive functioning, atypical behavioral development, and mental health concerns.

    “Furthermore, general early adversity has been linked to challenges with executive functioning (Lund et al., 2020), atypical behavioral development (Domoff et al., 2021; Howard et al., 2020; Ross et al., 2020; Wilke et al., 2020), and mental health concerns (Atluri et al., 2018; Pham et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Domoff, S. E., Borgen, A. L., Wilke, N., & Hiles Howard, A.
Affiliations
  • Central Michigan University (US)
  • Applied Research and Best Practice Initiative, Christian Alliance for Orphans, Arequipa 04017, Cayma, Peru
  • Department of Psychology, Samford University, Homewood, AL 35229, USA
Corresponding author
Domoff, Sarah E.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-06-22
Volume
18
Issue
13
Pages
6725
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3175107295
Cited by
22
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
adverse childhood experiences, problematic media use, at-risk youth, foster children, adopted children, caregiver perceptions, screen time, health risk behaviors
MeSH terms
Child, Adopted, Adverse Childhood Experiences, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review