Cited by 26Obesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health PracticesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Adolescents’ Perspectives on the Drivers of Obesity Using a Group Model Building Approach: A South African Perspective

Open access
Hendricks, Gaironeesa, Savona, Natalie, Aguiar, Anaely, Alaba, Olufunke, Booley, Sharmilah, Malczyk, Sonia, Nwosu, Emmanuel, Knai, Cecile +3 more·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Overweight and obesity increase the risk of a range of poor physiological and psychosocial health outcomes. Previous work with well-defined cohorts has explored the determinants of obesity and employed various methods and measures; however, less is known on the broader societal drivers, beyond individual-level influences, using a systems framework with adolescents. The aim of this study was to explore the drivers of obesity from adolescents’ perspectives using a systems approach through group model building in four South African schools. Group model building was used to generate 4 causal loop diagrams with 62 adolescents aged 16–18 years. These maps were merged into one final map, and the main themes were identified: (i) physical activity and social media use; (ii) physical activity, health-related morbidity, and socio-economic status; (iii) accessibility of unhealthy food and energy intake/body weight; (iv) psychological distress, body weight, and weight-related bullying; and (v) parental involvement and unhealthy food intake. Our study identified meaningful policy-relevant insights into the drivers of adolescent obesity, as described by the young people themselves in a South African context. This approach, both the process of construction and the final visualization, provides a basis for taking a novel approach to prevention and intervention recommendations for adolescent obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph19042160

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In CO-CREATE systems mapping workshops with 16-18-year-olds in six countries, social media, and in particular influencers and celebrities, was consistently reported as negatively impacting mental health, which in turn encouraged excessive and compulsive dietary intakes and reduced motivation to exercise and eat healthily.

    “Social media, and in particular influencers and celebrities, was consistently reported as negatively impacting mental health -specifically body image, self-esteem, stress, personal relationships and loneliness, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, which in turn encouraged excessive and compulsive dietary intakes and reduced motivation to exercise and eat healthily.”

    From Associations between social media, adolescent mental health, and diet: A systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hendricks, G., Savona, N., Aguiar, A., Alaba, O., Booley, S., Malczyk, S., Nwosu, E., Knai, C., Rutter, H., Klepp, K.-I., & Harbron, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
Corresponding author
Hendricks, Gaironeesa
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-14
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
2160
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4213198303
Cited by
26
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Union’s Horizon 2020 (774210)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
adolescent obesity, group model building, causal loop diagrams, systems approach, adolescents' perceptions, physical activity, social media use, socioeconomic status, energy intake, body weight, psychological distress, parental involvement, obesity prevention, South Africa
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Food, Humans, Schools, Exercise, Overweight, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review