Cited by 7Neuroscience of respiration and sleepPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes

Harmful Effect of Intrauterine Smoke Exposure on Neuronal Control of “Fetal Breathing System” in Stillbirths

Open access
Lavezzi, Anna M., Pusiol, Teresa, Paradiso, Beatrice·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

This article is aimed to contribute to the current knowledge on the role of toxic substances such as nicotine on sudden intrauterine unexplained deaths’ (SIUDS’) pathogenetic mechanisms. The in-depth histopathological examination of the autonomic nervous system in wide groups of victims of SIUDS (47 cases) and controls (20 cases), with both smoking and no-smoking mothers, highlighted the frequent presence of the hypodevelopment of brainstem structures checking the vital functions. In particular, the hypoplasia of the pontine parafacial nucleus together with hypoplastic lungs for gestational age were observed in SIUDS cases with mothers who smoked cigarettes, including electronic ones. The results allow us to assume that the products of cigarette smoke during pregnancy can easily cross the placental barrier, thus entering the fetal circulation and damaging the most sensitive organs, such as lungs and brain. In a non-negligible percentage of SIUDS, the mothers did not smoke. Furthermore, based on previous and ongoing studies conducted through analytical procedures and the use of scanning electron microscopy, the authors envisage the involvement of toxic nanoparticles (such as agricultural pesticides and nanomaterials increasingly used in biomedicine, bioscience and biotechnology) in the death pathogenesis, with similar mechanisms to those of nicotine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph19074164

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study reported that, among cases of sudden intrauterine unexplained deaths, adverse neuropathological brainstem outcomes (pulmonary hypoplasia, pFn hypoplasia) were more common for infants of exclusive-vapers.

    “The second reported that, among cases of sudden intrauterine unexplained deaths, adverse neuropathological brainstem outcomes (pulmonary hypoplasia, pFn hypoplasia) were more common for infants of exclusive-vapers [44], although neither samples sizes nor statistical tests were reported.”

    From Vaping during pregnancy: a systematic review of health outcomes. (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    Results §3.3 reports five mothers who used e-cigarettes, separately from four who used both e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes, among SIUDS cases with pulmonary hypoplasia. The Discussion says all nine e-cigarette-exposed cases had both lung and pFn hypodevelopment, supporting the finding for exclusive vapers. The paper does not report a separate statistical comparison showing these outcomes were more common among exclusive vapers; contrary to the citing sentence’s qualification, it does report their sample size. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One study observed that adverse neuropathological brainstem outcomes were more common for infants exposed to dual-use compared with infants of non-users.

    “One study observed that adverse neuropathological brainstem outcomes were more common for infants who were exposed to dual-use compared with infants of non-users and were similar among infants exposed to exclusive-smoking, dual-use or exclusive-vaping [44].”

    From Vaping during pregnancy: a systematic review of health outcomes. (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    Results §3.3 reports four mothers who used both e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes among the SIUDS cases with pulmonary hypoplasia; Discussion §4 says all nine e-cigarette-exposed cases had hypodevelopment of the parafacial nucleus and lungs. Results §3.4 reports a strong correlation between maternal smoking and brainstem findings, but the paper does not give a direct dual-use-versus-non-user comparison of neuropathological outcomes. Its cases were stillbirths, rather than infants generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Adverse neuropathological brainstem outcomes were similar among infants exposed to exclusive-smoking, dual-use or exclusive-vaping.

    “One study observed that adverse neuropathological brainstem outcomes were more common for infants who were exposed to dual-use compared with infants of non-users and were similar among infants exposed to exclusive-smoking, dual-use or exclusive-vaping [44].”

    From Vaping during pregnancy: a systematic review of health outcomes. (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results (§3.3; page unavailable) identify five mothers who used e-cigarettes and four who used both e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes. The Discussion (§4; page unavailable) reports hypodevelopment of the parafacial nucleus and lungs in all nine cases and describes the same defects in cases with smoking mothers. It does not directly compare neuropathological outcomes across the three exclusive-smoking, dual-use and exclusive-vaping groups, and its cases were stillbirths rather than live-born infants. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All three studies reported similar levels of adverse neurological outcomes for exclusive-vaping and exclusive-smoking for reflex, motor maturity and self-regulation scores, relative frequency of mouth movements, and neuropathological brainstem outcomes.

    “All three studies reported similar levels of adverse neurological outcomes for exclusive-vaping and exclusive-smoking, for the following outcomes: reflex, motor maturity and self-regulation scores [40], relative frequency of mouth movements [41], and neuropathological brainstem outcomes [44].”

    From Vaping during pregnancy: a systematic review of health outcomes. (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results (§3.3) identify five mothers who used e-cigarettes and four who used both e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes. The Discussion (§4) reports hypodevelopment of the parafacial nucleus and lungs in all nine cases, but does not compare the frequency or severity of brainstem findings between exclusive vaping and exclusive smoking. The reflex, motor-maturity, self-regulation, and mouth-movement outcomes are attached to other citations in the citing sentence, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among three small studies of neurological outcomes, for at least one outcome, two reported higher risk for exclusive-vaping compared with non-use.

    “In summary, among three small studies of neurological outcomes, for at least one outcome, two reported exclusive-vaping having a similar risk to non-use [40, 41] and two reported higher risk for exclusive-vaping [40, 44].”

    From Vaping during pregnancy: a systematic review of health outcomes. (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results (§3.3; page unavailable) identify five mothers who used e-cigarettes without reported conventional-cigarette use among the stillbirth cases with pulmonary hypoplasia. The Discussion (§4; page unavailable) says the nine e-cigarette-exposed cases had underdevelopment of a respiratory neuronal center, but the paper does not report a neurological-outcome risk comparison between exclusive vaping and non-use. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 66 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. [1]Ikeda K. Kawakami K. Onimaru H. Okada Y. Yokota S. Koshiya N. Oku Y. Iizuka M. Koizumi H. The respiratory control mechanisms in the brainstem and spinal cord: Integrative views of the neuroanatomy and neurophysiology J. Physiol. Sci. 2017 67 45 62 10.1007/s12576-016-0475-y 27535569 PMC5368202 · DOI
  2. [2]Lavezzi A.M. A new theory to explain the underlying pathogenetic mechanism of sudden infant death syndrome Front. Neurol. 2015 6 220 10.3389/fneur.2015.00220 26539157 PMC4610199 · DOI
  3. [3]Harding R. Fetal pulmonary development: The role of respiratory movements Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 1997 24 32 39 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb05076.x 9355800 · DOI
  4. [4]Koos B.J. Rajaee A. Fetal breathing movements and changes at birth Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014 814 89 101 25015803
  5. [5]Blanco C.E. Maturation of fetal breathing activity Biol. Neonate 1994 65 182 188 10.1159/000244050 8038281 · DOI
  6. [6]Boddy K. Dawes G.S. Fetal breathing Br. Med. Bull. 1975 31 3 7 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071237 1237340 · DOI
  7. [7]Bryan A.C. Bowes G. Maloney J.E. Control of Breathing in the Fetus and the New-Born Handbook of Physiology, the Respiratory System II, Vol. 2. Control of Breathing Cherniack N.S. Widdicombe J.G. American Physiological Society Bethesda, MD, USA 1986 621 647
  8. [8]Greer J.J. Control of breathing activity in the fetus and newborn Compr. Physiol. 2012 2 1873 1888 23723027
  9. [9]Matturri L. Lavezzi A.M. Minoli I. Ottaviani G. Rubino B. Cappellini A. Rossi L. Association between pulmonary hypoplasia and hypoplasia of arcuate nucleus in stillbirth J. Perinatol. 2003 23 328 332 10.1038/sj.jp.7210900 12774143 · DOI
  10. [10]Laudy J.A. Wladimiroff J.W. The fetal lung. 2: Pulmonary hypoplasia Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2000 16 482 494 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00252.x 11169336 · DOI
  11. [11]Constitution of the Italian Republic Law n° 31. Regulations for Diagnostic Post-Mortem Investigation in Victims of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Unexpected Fetal Death. Official Gazette of the Italian Republic, General Series 2006; 34: 4 Available online: http://users.unimi.it/centrolinorossi/files/gazz_ufficiale.pdf (accessed on 29 May 2015)
  12. [12]Roncati L. Piscioli F. Pusiol T. Lavezzi A.M. Neuropathological protocol for the study of unexplained stillbirth Folia Neuropathol. 2017 55 79 85 10.5114/fn.2017.68576 28677366 · DOI
  13. [13]Lavezzi A.M. Piscioli F. Pusiol T. Jorizzo G. Ferrero S. Sudden intrauterine unexplained death: Time to adopt uniform postmortem investigative guidelines? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019 19 526 10.1186/s12884-019-2603-1 31888538 PMC6936151 · DOI
  14. [14]Tzatzarakis M.N. Vardavas C.I. Terzi I. Kavalakis M. Kokkinakis M. Liesivuori J. Tsatsakis A.M. Hair nicotine/cotinine concentrations as a method of monitoring exposure to tobacco smoke among infants and adults Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2012 31 258 265 10.1177/0960327111422401 22027507 · DOI
  15. [15]Askenazi S.S. Perlman M. Pulmonary hypoplasia: Lung weight and radial alveolar count as criteria of diagnosis Arch. Dis. Child. 1979 54 614 618 10.1136/adc.54.8.614 507916 PMC1545796 · DOI
  16. [16]Paradiso B. Ferrero S. Thiene G. Lavezzi A.M. Variability of the medullary arcuate nucleus in humans Brain Behav. 2018 8 e01133 10.1002/brb3.1133 30329220 PMC6236238 · DOI
  17. [17]Morrow R.J. Ritchie J.W. Bull S.B. Maternal cigarette smoking: The effects on umbilical and uterine blood flow velocity Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1988 159 1069 1071 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90415-2 3055994 · DOI
  18. [18]Ho B.L. Victoria C.G. Menezes A.M. Halpern R. Barros F.C. Low birthweight, preterm births and intrauterine growth retardation in relation to maternal smoking Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 1997 11 140 151 9131707
  19. [19]Rogers J.M. Tobacco and pregnancy: Overview of exposure and effects Birth Defects Res. Part C Embryo Today Rev. 2008 84 1 15 10.1002/bdrc.20119 18383133 · DOI
  20. [20]Di Franza J.R. Lew R.A. Effect of maternal cigarette smoking on pregnancy complications and sudden infant death syndrome J. Fam. Pract. 1995 40 385 394 7699353
  21. [21]Lavezzi A.M. Toxic effect of cigarette smoke on brainstem nicotinic receptor expression: Primary Cause of sudden unexplained perinatal death Toxics 2018 6 63 10.3390/toxics6040063 PMC6316297 30340403 · DOI
  22. [22]Lavezzi A.M. Matturri L. Del Corno G. Johanson C.E. Vulnerability of fourth ventricle choroid plexus in sudden unexplained fetal and infant death syndromes related to smoking mothers Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2013 31 319 327 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2013.04.006 23680292 · DOI
  23. [23]Swischuk L.E. Richardson C.J. Nichols M.M. Ingman M.J. Primary pulmonary hypoplasia in the neonate J. Pediatr. 1979 95 573 577 480037
  24. [24]Stick S.M. Burton P.R. Gurrin L. Sly P.D. LeSouëf P.N. Effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy and a family history of asthma on respiratory function in newborn infants Lancet 1996 348 1060 1064 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)04446-7 8874457 · DOI
  25. [25]Fauroux B. Smoking, fetal pulmonary development and lung disease in children J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 2003 32 1S17 22 12592158
  26. [27]Le Houezec J. Role of nicotine pharmacokinetics in nicotine addiction and nicotine replacement therapy: A review Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2003 7 811 819 12971663
  27. [30]Laterra J. Keep R. Betz L.A. Goldstein G.W. Blood-Brain Barrier Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects 6th ed. Siegel G.J. Agranoff B.W. Albers R.W. Fisher S.K. Uhler M.D. Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia, PA, USA 1999
  28. [31]Ernst A. Zibrak J.D. Carbon monoxide poisoning N. Engl. J. Med. 1998 339 1603 1608 10.1056/NEJM199811263392206 9828249 · DOI
  29. [32]Hawort S.G. Hislop A.A. Lung development-the effects of chronic hypoxia Semin. Neonatol. 2003 8 1 8 10.1016/S1084-2756(02)00195-1 12667825 · DOI
  30. [34]Lichtensteiger W. Ribary U. Schiumpf M. Odermatt B. Widmer H.R. Prenatal adverse effects of nicotine on the developing brain Prog. Brain Res. 1988 73 137 157 3047793
  31. [35]Faroon O. Ashizawa A. Wright S. Tucker P. Jenkins K. Ingerman L. Rudisill C. Toxicological Profile for Cadmium Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Atlanta, GA, USA 2012 24049863
  32. [36]Sikorski R. Radomański T. Paszkowski T. Skoda J. Smoking during pregnancy and the perinatal cadmium burden J. Perinat. Med. 1988 16 225 231 10.1515/jpme.1988.16.3.225 3210108 · DOI
  33. [37]Järup L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination Br. Med. Bull. 2003 68 167 182 10.1093/bmb/ldg032 14757716 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [38]Shukla A. Shukla G.S. Srimal R.C. Cadmium-induced alterations in blood-brain barrier permeability and its possible correlation with decreased microvessel antioxidant potential in rat Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 1996 15 400 405 10.1177/096032719601500507 8735464 · DOI
  35. [39]Wang B. Du Y. Cadmium and its neurotoxic effects Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2013 2013 898034 10.1155/2013/898034 23997854 PMC3753751 · DOI
  36. [41]Kapa S. Venkatachalam K.L. Asirvatham S.J. The autonomic nervous system in cardiac electrophysiology. An elegant interaction and emerging concepts Cardiol. Rev. 2010 18 275 284 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181ebb152 20926936 · DOI
  37. [42]Dick T.E. Hsieh Y.H. Dhingra R.R. Baekey D.M. Galán R.F. Wehrwein E. Morris K.F. Cardiorespiratory coupling: Common rhythms in cardiac, sympathetic, and respiratory activities Prog. Brain Res. 2014 209 191 205 24746049 PMC4052709
  38. [43]Garcia A.J. Koschnitzky J.E. Dashevskiy T. Ramirez J.M. Cardiorespiratory coupling in health and disease Auton. Neurosci. 2013 175 26 37 10.1016/j.autneu.2013.02.006 23497744 PMC3683976 · DOI
  39. [44]Janczewski W.A. Feldman J.L. Distinct rhythm generators for inspiration and expiration in the juvenile rat J. Physiol. 2006 570 407 420 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.098848 16293645 PMC1464316 · DOI
  40. [45]Onimaru H. Kumagawa Y. Homma I. Respiration-related rhythmic activity in the rostral medulla of newborn rats J. Neurophysiol. 2006 96 55 61 10.1152/jn.01175.2005 16495360 · DOI
  41. [46]Onimaru H. Ikeda K. Kawakami K. Postsynaptic mechanisms of CO2 responses in parafacial respiratory neurons of newborn rats J. Physiol. 2012 590 1615 1624 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.222687 22310312 PMC3413489 · DOI
  42. [47]Smith J.C. Abdala A.P. Borgmann A. Rybak I.A. Paton J.F. Brainstem respiratory networks: Building blocks and microcircuits Trends Neurosci. 2013 36 152 162 10.1016/j.tins.2012.11.004 23254296 PMC4080795 · DOI
  43. [48]Huckstepp R.T.R. Cardoza K.P. Henderson L.E. Feldman J.L. Distinct parafacial regions in control of breathing in adult rats PLoS ONE 2018 13 e0201485 30096151 PMC6086409
  44. [49]Dutschmann M. Jones S.E. Subramanian H.H. Stanic D. Bautista T.G. The physiological significance of postinspiration in respiratory control Prog. Brain Res. 2014 212 113 130 25194196
  45. [50]Zoccal D.B. Simms A.E. Bonagamba L.G. Braga V.A. Pickering A.E. Paton J.F.R. Machado B.H. Increased sympathetic outflow in juvenile rats submitted to chronic intermittent hypoxia correlates with enhanced expiratory activity J. Physiol. 2008 586 3253 3265 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.154187 18450774 PMC2538770 · DOI
  46. [51]Marsot A. Simon N. Nicotine and cotinine levels with electronic cigarette: A review Int. J. Toxicol. 2015 35 179 185 10.1177/1091581815618935 26681385 · DOI
  47. [52]Sleiman M. Logue J.M. Montesinos V.N. Russell M.L. Litter M.I. Gundel A. Destaillats H. Emissions from electronic cigarettes: Key parameters affecting the release of harmful chemicals Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016 50 9644 9651 10.1021/acs.est.6b01741 27461870 · DOI
  48. [53]Orzabal M. Ramadoss J. Impact of electronic cigarette aerosols on pregnancy and early development Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2019 14 14 20 10.1016/j.cotox.2019.05.001 31214660 PMC6581464 · DOI
  49. [54]Whittington J.R. Simmons P.M. Phillips A.M. Gammill S.K. Cen R. Magann E.F. Cardenas V.M. The use of electronic cigarettes in pregnancy: A review of the literature Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2018 73 544 549 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000595 30265741 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [55]Noël A. Hansen S. Zaman A. Perveen Z. Pinkston R. Hossain E. Xiao R. Penn A. In utero exposures to electronic-cigarette aerosols impair the Wnt signaling during mouse lung development Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2020 318 L705 L722 10.1152/ajplung.00408.2019 32083945 · DOI
  51. [56]Glinianiaia S. Bell R. Pless-Mulloli T. Howel D. Particulate air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: A review of the literature Epidemiology 2004 15 36 45 14712145
  52. [57]Backes C.H. Nelin T. Gorr M.W. Wold L.E. Early life exposure to air pollution: How bad is it? Toxicol. Lett. 2013 216 47 53 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.11.007 23164674 PMC3527658 · DOI
  53. [59]Lavezzi A.M. Cappiello A. Pusiol T. Corna M.F. Termopoli V. Matturri L. Pesticide exposure during pregnancy, like nicotine, affects the brainstem α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor expression, increasing the risk of sudden unexplained perinatal death J. Neurol. Sci. 2015 348 94 100 10.1016/j.jns.2014.11.014 25433450 · DOI
  54. [60]Roncati L. Pusiol T. Piscioli F. Lavezzi A.M. Neurodevelopmental disorders and pesticide exposure: The northeastern Italian experience Arch. Toxicol. 2017 91 603 604 10.1007/s00204-016-1920-7 28032145 · DOI
  55. [62]Arbuckle T.E. Sever L.E. Pesticide exposures and fetal death: A review of the epidemiologic literature Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1998 28 229 270 10.1080/10408449891344218 9631282 · DOI
  56. [63]Pastore L.M. Hertz-Picciotto I. Beaumont J.J. Risk of stillbirth from occupational and residential exposures Occup. Environ. Med. 1997 54 511 518 10.1136/oem.54.7.511 9282129 PMC1128822 · DOI
  57. [64]Grippo A. Zhang J. Chu L. Guo Y. Qiao L. Zhang J. Myneni A.A. Mu L. Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and spontaneous abortion and stillbirth Rev. Environ. Health 2018 33 247 264 10.1515/reveh-2017-0033 29975668 PMC7183911 · DOI
  58. [65]Bates E. Rouse D.J. Mann M.L. Chapman V. Carlo W.A. Tita A.T.N. Neonatal outcomes after demonstrated fetal lung maturity before 39 weeks of gestation Obstet. Gynecol. 2010 116 1288 1295 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fb7ece 21099593 PMC4074509 · DOI
  59. [66]O’Brien W.F. Cefalo R.C. Clinical applicability of amniotic fluid tests for fetal pulmonic maturity Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1980 136 135 144 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90579-7 6986086 · DOI
  60. [67]Ogawa R. Kido T. Nakamura M. Kido T. Mochizuki T. Sugiyama T. Magnetic resonance assessment of fetal lung maturity: Comparison between signal intensity and volume measurement Jpn. J. Radiol. 2018 36 444 449 10.1007/s11604-018-0745-0 29767297 · DOI

Authors
Lavezzi, A. M., Pusiol, T., & Paradiso, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Institute of Anatomic Pathology, APSS, 38122 Trento, Italy
Corresponding author
Lavezzi, Anna M.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-03-31
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
4164
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221127477
Cited by
7
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
stillbirth, maternal smoking, nicotine, autonomic nervous system, brainstem hypoplasia, fetal lung hypoplasia, placental barrier, electronic cigarettes, nanoparticle toxicity, pesticide toxicity
MeSH terms
Female, Fetal Death, Humans, Nicotine, Placenta, Pregnancy, Sudden Infant Death, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review