Cited by 18Heavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityHeavy metals in environmentHeavy Metals in Plants

Potentially toxic elements in costume cosmetics used by children and adults are associated with Cancer risk

Open access
Salles, Fernanda Junqueira, Paniz, Fernanda Pollo, Batista, Bruno Lemos, Nardocci, Adelaide Cassia, Olympio, Kelly Polido Kaneshiro·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

(1) Background: Costume cosmetics, such as face paints and pancakes, are used by adults and children during Halloween, Carnival, or children’s parties. However, the metallic-based pigments used as dyes in these products may contain toxic elements associated with different levels of exposure. Objectives: (a) to determine the Al, As, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sb, Sn, and Sr concentrations in face paints and pancakes; and (b) to estimate cancer and non-cancer risks posed by the concentrations of each element in these products for dermal and ingestion exposure scenarios during children and adult use. (2) Methods: A total of 95 samples of face paints and pancakes (four brands in different textures and colors) were purchased at the largest high-street commercial center in São Paulo city, Brazil. An extraction procedure with nitric acid was carried out using a graphite-covered digester block. Toxic element determinations were performed using an ICP-MS. (3) Results: The non-cancer risks estimated were lower than 1, except for dermal exposure in adults for some target systems. High cancer risk values raise concerns in both groups. The risk for children ranged from 10−8 to 10−5 and proved higher in cases of accidental exposure by ingestion. For occupational exposure in adults, cancer risks were even higher, ranging from 10−3 to 10−5, with the highest values associated with dermal exposure. (4) Conclusions: The study results suggest the presence of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in cosmetics should be regulated/monitored to protect human health, especially for occupational exposure and use by children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph20010531

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of certain chemicals in cosmetics has the potential to disrupt the delicate balance of hormones within the body, a phenomenon closely associated with the initiation and progression of cancer.

    “Furthermore, the presence of certain chemicals in cosmetics has the potential to disrupt the delicate balance of hormones within the body, a phenomenon closely associated with the initiation and progression of cancer (111).”

    From The dark side of beauty: an in-depth analysis of the health hazards and toxicological impact of synthetic cosmetics and personal care products (2024) · cites this paper as [111]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports elevated cancer-risk estimates from exposure to potentially toxic elements in costume cosmetics. It does not link that risk to hormone disruption or address cancer initiation and progression through a hormonal mechanism; searches for endocrine and hormonal disruption found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Regular use of multiple cosmetics over protracted periods can result in repetitive exposure to relatively low levels of potentially carcinogenic compounds; over time, these exposures accumulate and may contribute significantly to the development of cancer.

    “Regular use of multiple cosmetics over protracted periods can result in repetitive exposure to relatively low levels of potentially carcinogenic compounds. Over time, these exposures accumulate and may contribute significantly to the development of cancer, making the long-term effects of such exposure particularly disconcerting.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [36]EC, European Commission Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs: Workshop on ‘Acceptable Level of Risk to Workers and Consumers Exposed to Carcinogenic Substances’ Albert Borschette Conference Centre Brussels, Belgium 2016 Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/content/workshop-acceptable-level-risk-workers-and-consumers-exposed-carcinogenic-substances-0_en (accessed on 16 September 2021)
  2. [37]Whittaker C. Rice F. McKernan L. Dankovic D. Lentz T.J. MacMahon K. Kuempel E. Zumwalde R. Schulte P. Current Intelligence Bulletin 68: NIOSH Chemical Carcinogen Policy US Department of Health and Human Services Washington, DC, USA 2016
  3. [46]Health Canada Guidance on Heavy Metal Impurities in Cosmetics, vol. 2013. Consumer Product Safety 2012 Available online: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/pubs/indust/heavy_metals-metaux_lourds/index-eng.php (accessed on 16 September 2021)
  4. [60]ATSDR, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Toxicological Profile for Arsenic U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Atlanta, GA, USA 2007 37184170
  5. [64]IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer Chlorinated Drinking-Water; Chlorination By-Products; Some Other Halogenated Compounds; Cobalt and Cobalt Compounds IARC Lyon, France 1991 Volume 52 PMC7681469 1683674
  6. [67]ATSDR, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Toxicological Profile for Cadmium U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Atlanta, GA, USA 2012 24049863
  7. [72]ATSDR, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Toxicological Profile for Strontium U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Atlanta, GA, USA 2004 38527161
  8. [75]ATSDR, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Toxicological Profile for Aluminum U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Atlanta, GA, USA 2008 37983316

Authors
Salles, F. J., Paniz, F. P., Batista, B. L., Nardocci, A. C., & Olympio, K. P. K.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do ABC (BR)
  • Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil
Corresponding author
Olympio, Kelly Polido Kaneshiro
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-12-28
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
531
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313327720
Cited by
18
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • São Paulo Research Foundation (#2016/11087-8, #2018/18391-0, #2017/25424-9, #314637/2021-4)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (#2016/11087-8, #2018/18391-0, #2017/25424-9, #314637/2021-4)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
Keywords
potentially toxic elements, face paint, metallic pigments, cancer risk, non-carcinogenic risk, dermal exposure, oral exposure, occupational exposure, children's exposure, heavy metals, lead, cadmium, arsenic
MeSH terms
Adult, Brazil, Child, Cities, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Neoplasms, Occupational Exposure, Risk Assessment, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review