The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Removal of Copper Ions from Wastewater: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Copper pollution of the world’s water resources is becoming increasingly serious and poses a serious threat to human health and aquatic ecosystems. With reported copper concentrations in wastewater ranging from approximately 2.5 mg/L to 10,000 mg/L, a summary of remediation techniques for different contamination scenarios is essential. Therefore, it is important to develop low-cost, feasible, and sustainable wastewater removal technologies. Various methods for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater have been extensively studied in recent years. This paper reviews the current methods used to treat Cu(II)-containing wastewater and evaluates these technologies and their health effects. These technologies include membrane separation, ion exchange, chemical precipitation, electrochemistry, adsorption, and biotechnology. Thus, in this paper, we review the efforts and technological advances made so far in the pursuit of more efficient removal and recovery of Cu(II) from industrial wastewater and compare the advantages and disadvantages of each technology in terms of research prospects, technical bottlenecks, and application scenarios. Meanwhile, this study points out that achieving low health risk effluent through technology coupling is the focus of future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review
Fu, F., & Wang, Q. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 · Cited by 8,703
Role of nanomaterials as adsorbents in heavy metal ion removal from waste water: A review
Wadhawan, S., Jain, A., Nayyar, J., & Mehta, S. K. (2020) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101038 · Cited by 530
Ozaki, H., Sharma, K., & Saktaywin, W. (2002) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(02)00329-6 · Cited by 362
Nemati, M., Hosseini, S. M., & Shabanian, M. (2017) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.04.074 · Cited by 175
Tian, J., Chang, H., Gao, S., & Zhang, R. (2020) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2020.114499 · Cited by 156
Effect of pH on the biosorption of nickel and other heavy metals by Pseudomonas fluorescens 4F39
López, A., Lázaro, N., Priego, J. M., & Marqués, A. M. (2000) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/sj.jim.2900793 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Wang, H., Cui, Y., & Chen, N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-02-22
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3885
- ISSN
- 1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4321496214
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 21.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removal of Copper Ions from Wastewater: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijerph20053885
- The paper
- Liu, Y., Wang, H., Cui, Y., & Chen, N. (2023). Removal of Copper Ions from Wastewater: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053885
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.