Cited by 24Municipal Solid Waste ManagementHydrological Forecasting Using AINeural Networks and Applications

Comparative Analysis of the Implementation of Support Vector Machines and Long Short-Term Memory Artificial Neural Networks in Municipal Solid Waste Management Models in Megacities

Open access
Solano Meza, Johanna Karina, Orjuela Yepes, David, Rodrigo-Ilarri, Javier, Rodrigo-Clavero, María-Elena·2023·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The development of methodologies to support decision-making in municipal solid waste (MSW) management processes is of great interest for municipal administrations. Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques provide multiple tools for designing algorithms to objectively analyze data while creating highly precise models. Support vector machines and neuronal networks are formed by AI applications offering optimization solutions at different managing stages. In this paper, an implementation and comparison of the results obtained by two AI methods on a solid waste management problem is shown. Support vector machine (SVM) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network techniques have been used. The implementation of LSTM took into account different configurations, temporal filtering and annual calculations of solid waste collection periods. Results show that the SVM method properly fits selected data and yields consistent regression curves, even with very limited training data, leading to more accurate results than those obtained by the LSTM method.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph20054256

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unchecked AI use can encourage passive learning and cognitive offloading, particularly in environments where rapid completion of tasks is rewarded more strongly than reflective practice.

    “This finding reinforces concerns that unchecked AI use can encourage passive learning and cognitive offloading, particularly in environments where rapid completion of tasks is rewarded more strongly than reflective practice [15, 16, 37].”

    From From adoption to interaction: examining human-GenAI engagement patterns, ethical tensions, and educational trade-offs in nursing education (2026) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction and Discussion (pages not provided) address AI models for municipal solid waste management, not human learning. Searches for passive learning, cognitive offloading, and incentives for rapid task completion found no passage addressing the attributed concern. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [46]Puri M. Solanki A. Padawer T. Tipparaju S.M. Moreno W.A. Pathak Y. Introduction to Artificial Neural Network (ANN) as a Predictive Tool for Drug Design, Discovery, Delivery, and Disposition: Basic Concepts and Modeling Artificial Neural Network for Drug Design, Delivery and Disposition Puri M. Pathak Y. Sutariya V.K. Tipparaju S. Moreno W.A. Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2016 10.1016/C2014-0-00253-5 978-0-12-801559-9 · DOI
  2. [51]Solano-Meza J.K. Methodological proposal based on artificial neural networks based on artificial neural networks for the determination of the the optimal management of solid urban waste management: Application in the localities of Suba and Engativá in the city of Bogotá (Colombia) (in Spanish) Ph.D. Thesis Universitat Politècnica de València Valencia, Spain 2021

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solano Meza, J. K., Orjuela Yepes, D., Rodrigo-Ilarri, J., & Rodrigo-Clavero, M.-E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Environmental Engineering, Santo Tomás University, Road 9 Street 51-11, Bogotá 110231, Colombia
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-02-27
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
4256
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4322631256
Cited by
24
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
municipal solid waste management, support vector machine, long short-term memory networks, artificial neural networks, megacities, waste collection scheduling, regression prediction, model comparison
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Cities, Refuse Disposal, Neural Networks, Computer, Waste Management, Support Vector Machine, Solid Waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review