Cited by 82Air Quality and Health ImpactsClimate Change and Health ImpactsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Impact of climate change on ambient ozone level and mortality in southeastern United States

Open access
Chang, Howard H., Zhou, Jingwen, Fuentes, Montserrat·2010·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

There is a growing interest in quantifying the health impacts of climate change. This paper examines the risks of future ozone levels on non-accidental mortality across 19 urban communities in Southeastern United States. We present a modeling framework that integrates data from climate model outputs, historical meteorology and ozone observations, and a health surveillance database. We first modeled present-day relationships between observed maximum daily 8-hour average ozone concentrations and meteorology measured during the year 2000. Future ozone concentrations for the period 2041 to 2050 were then projected using calibrated climate model output data from the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program. Daily community-level mortality counts for the period 1987 to 2000 were obtained from the National Mortality, Morbidity and Air Pollution Study. Controlling for temperature, dew-point temperature, and seasonality, relative risks associated with short-term exposure to ambient ozone during the summer months were estimated using a multi-site time series design. We estimated an increase of 0.43 ppb (95% PI: 0.14-0.75) in average ozone concentration during the 2040's compared to 2000 due to climate change alone. This corresponds to a 0.01% increase in mortality rate and 45.2 (95% PI: 3.26-87.1) premature deaths in the study communities attributable to the increase in future ozone level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph7072866

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Average ozone concentration across 19 urban communities in southeastern United States would increase by 0.43 ppb (95% CI: 0.14-0.75) during the 2040s compared to 2000 due to climate change alone.

    “estimated an increase of 0.43 ppb (95% CI: 0.14–0.75) in average ozone concentration during the 2040s compared to 2000 due to climate change alone (9).”

    From Ozone pollution: A Major health hazard worldwide (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

  • An estimated increase of 0.43 ppb in average ozone concentration during the 2040s compared to 2000 due to climate change alone would correspond to a 0.01% increase in mortality rate in 19 urban communities in southeastern United States.

    “For example, an estimated increase of 0.43 ppb in average ozone concentration, during the 2040s compared to 2000 due to climate change alone, would correspond to a 0.01% increase in mortality rate in 19 urban communities in southeastern United States (9).”

    From Ozone pollution: A Major health hazard worldwide (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 82

Authors
Chang, H. H., Zhou, J., & Fuentes, M.
Affiliations
  • Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Statistics Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
Corresponding author
Chang, Howard H.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2010-07-14
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
2866-2880
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989120561
Cited by
82
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES014843)
  • Division of Mathematical Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
climate change, ambient ozone, non-accidental mortality, air pollution health effects, ozone projections, climate model output, relative risk, premature mortality, urban communities, southeastern United States, health surveillance data
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Bayes Theorem, Humans, Ozone, Urban Population, Weather, Southeastern United States, Models, Statistical, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review