The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geographic Situational Awareness: Mining Tweets for Disaster Preparedness, Emergency Response, Impact, and Recovery
Open accessAbstract
Social media data have emerged as a new source for detecting and monitoring disaster events. A number of recent studies have suggested that social media data streams can be used to mine actionable data for emergency response and relief operation. However, no effort has been made to classify social media data into stages of disaster management (mitigation, preparedness, emergency response, and recovery), which has been used as a common reference for disaster researchers and emergency managers for decades to organize information and streamline priorities and activities during the course of a disaster. This paper makes an initial effort in coding social media messages into different themes within different disaster phases during a time-critical crisis by manually examining more than 10,000 tweets generated during a natural disaster and referencing the findings from the relevant literature and official government procedures involving different disaster stages. Moreover, a classifier based on logistic regression is trained and used for automatically mining and classifying the social media messages into various topic categories during various disaster phases. The classification results are necessary and useful for emergency managers to identify the transition between phases of disaster management, the timing of which is usually unknown and varies across disaster events, so that they can take action quickly and efficiently in the impacted communities. Information generated from the classification can also be used by the social science research communities to study various aspects of preparedness, response, impact and recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors
Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., & Matsuo, Y. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772777 · Cited by 3,640
Vieweg, S., Hughes, A. L., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2010) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753486 · Cited by 1,427
A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British Class Survey Experiment
Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S., & Miles, A. (2013) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038513481128 · Cited by 1,303
Signorini, A., Segre, A. M., & Polgreen, P. M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019467 · Cited by 1,235
Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief
Gao, H., Barbier, G., & Goolsby, R. (2011) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2011.52 · Cited by 774
Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information
Goodchild, M. F., & Li, L. (2012) · Spatial Statistics · doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002 · Cited by 771
de Albuquerque, J. P., Herfort, B., Brenning, A., & Zipf, A. (2015) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658816.2014.996567 · Cited by 385
Owen, S., Anil, R., Dunning, T. E., & Friedman, E. (2011) · Cited by 272
Emergency situation awareness from twitter for crisis management
Cameron, M. A., Power, R., Robinson, B., & Yin, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187980.2188183 · Cited by 267
Practical extraction of disaster-relevant information from social media
Imran, M., Elbassuoni, S., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Meier, P. (2013) · Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2487788.2488109 · Cited by 234
Cited by
Zhang, C., Fan, C., Yao, W., Hu, X., & Mostafavi, A. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.004 · Cited by 293
Multiscale dynamic human mobility flow dataset in the U.S. during the COVID-19 epidemic
Kang, Y., Gao, S., Liang, Y., Li, M., Rao, J., & Kruse, J. (2020) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-020-00734-5 · Cited by 258
Social media in operations and supply chain management: State-of-the-Art and research directions
Huang, S., Potter, A., & Eyers, D. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1702228 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, Q., & Xiao, Y.
- Venue
- ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2015-08-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1549-1568
- ISSN
- 2220-9964 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1487925325
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 54.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geographic Situational Awareness: Mining Tweets for Disaster Preparedness, Emergency Response, Impact, and Recovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijgi4031549
- The paper
- Huang, Q., & Xiao, Y. (2015). Geographic Situational Awareness: Mining Tweets for Disaster Preparedness, Emergency Response, Impact, and Recovery. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4031549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.