The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fabrication of Chitosan/Silk Fibroin Composite Nanofibers for Wound-dressing Applications
Open accessAbstract
Chitosan, a naturally occurring polysaccharide with abundant resources, has been extensively exploited for various biomedical applications, typically as wound dressings owing to its unique biocompatibility, good biodegradability and excellent antibacterial properties. In this work, composite nanofibrous membranes of chitosan (CS) and silk fibroin (SF) were successfully fabricated by electrospinning. The morphology of electrospun blend nanofibers was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the fiber diameters decreased with the increasing percentage of chitosan. Further, the mechanical test illustrated that the addition of silk fibroin enhanced the mechanical properties of CS/SF nanofibers. The antibacterial activities against Escherichia coli (Gram negative) and Staphylococcus aureus (Gram positive) were evaluated by the turbidity measurement method; and results suggest that the antibacterial effect of composite nanofibers varied on the type of bacteria. Furthermore, the biocompatibility of murine fibroblast on as-prepared nanofibrous membranes was investigated by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and MTT assays in vitro, and the membranes were found to promote the cell attachment and proliferation. These results suggest that as-prepared chitosan/silk fibroin (CS/SF) composite nanofibrous membranes could be a promising candidate for wound healing applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In vivo blood compatibility of regenerated silk fibroin.
Sakabe, H., Ito, H., Miyamoto, T., Noishiki, Y., & Ha, W. S. (1989) · Sen'i Gakkaishi · doi:10.2115/fiber.45.11_487 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications
Jayakumar, R., Prabaharan, M., Sudheesh Kumar, P. T., Nair, S. V., & Tamura, H. (2011) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.005 · Cited by 1,924
Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing
Mogoşanu, G. D., & Grumezescu, A. M. (2014) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.015 · Cited by 1,052
Recent advances on antimicrobial wound dressing: A review
Simões, D., Miguel, S. P., Ribeiro, M. P., Coutinho, P., Mendonça, A. G., & Correia, I. J. (2018) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.02.022 · Cited by 935
Chitin and chitosan in selected biomedical applications
Anitha, A., Sowmya, S., Kumar, P. T. S., Deepthi, S., Chennazhi, K. P., Ehrlich, H., Tsurkan, M., & Jayakumar, R. (2014) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.008 · Cited by 931
Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review
Nikolova, M. P., & Chavali, M. S. (2019) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.10.005 · Cited by 907
Metadata
- Authors
- Cai, Z.-X., Mo, X.-M., Zhang, K.-H., Fan, L.-P., Yin, A.-L., He, C.-L., & Wang, H.-S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2010-09-21
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3529-3539
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988721141
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fabrication of Chitosan/Silk Fibroin Composite Nanofibers for Wound-dressing Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijms11093529
- The paper
- Cai, Z.-X., Mo, X.-M., Zhang, K.-H., Fan, L.-P., Yin, A.-L., He, C.-L., & Wang, H.-S. (2010). Fabrication of Chitosan/Silk Fibroin Composite Nanofibers for Wound-dressing Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11093529
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.