The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacterial Cellulose Production from Industrial Waste and by-Product Streams
Open accessAbstract
The utilization of fermentation media derived from waste and by-product streams from biodiesel and confectionery industries could lead to highly efficient production of bacterial cellulose. Batch fermentations with the bacterial strain Komagataeibacter sucrofermentans DSM (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen) 15973 were initially carried out in synthetic media using commercial sugars and crude glycerol. The highest bacterial cellulose concentration was achieved when crude glycerol (3.2 g/L) and commercial sucrose (4.9 g/L) were used. The combination of crude glycerol and sunflower meal hydrolysates as the sole fermentation media resulted in bacterial cellulose production of 13.3 g/L. Similar results (13 g/L) were obtained when flour-rich hydrolysates produced from confectionery industry waste streams were used. The properties of bacterial celluloses developed when different fermentation media were used showed water holding capacities of 102–138 g·water/g·dry bacterial cellulose, viscosities of 4.7–9.3 dL/g, degree of polymerization of 1889.1–2672.8, stress at break of 72.3–139.5 MPa and Young’s modulus of 0.97–1.64 GPa. This study demonstrated that by-product streams from the biodiesel industry and waste streams from confectionery industries could be used as the sole sources of nutrients for the production of bacterial cellulose with similar properties as those produced with commercial sources of nutrients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial Cellulose as a Raw Material for Food and Food Packaging Applications
Azeredo, H. M. C., Barud, H., Farinas, C. S., Vasconcellos, V. M., & Claro, A. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2019.00007 · Cited by 495
Bacterial biopolymers: from pathogenesis to advanced materials
Moradali, M. F., & Rehm, B. H. A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0313-3 · Cited by 459
Waste biorefinery towards a sustainable circular bioeconomy: a solution to global issues
Leong, H. Y., Chang, C.-K., Khoo, K. S., Chew, K. W., Chia, S. R., Lim, J. W., Chang, J.-S., & Show, P. L. (2021) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-021-01939-5 · Cited by 432
Production and Status of Bacterial Cellulose in Biomedical Engineering
Moniri, M., Boroumand Moghaddam, A., Azizi, S., Abdul Rahim, R., Bin Ariff, A., Zuhainis Saad, W., Navaderi, M., & Mohamad, R. (2017) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano7090257 · Cited by 319
Cost-effective production of bacterial cellulose using acidic food industry by-products
Revin, V., Liyaskina, E., Nazarkina, M., Bogatyreva, A., & Shchankin, M. (2018) · Brazilian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.bjm.2017.12.012 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsouko, E., Kourmentza, C., Ladakis, D., Kopsahelis, N., Mandala, I., Papanikolaou, S., Paloukis, F., Alves, V., & Koutinas, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2015-07-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 14832-14849
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1656833255
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial Cellulose Production from Industrial Waste and by-Product Streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijms160714832
- The paper
- Tsouko, E., Kourmentza, C., Ladakis, D., Kopsahelis, N., Mandala, I., Papanikolaou, S., Paloukis, F., Alves, V., & Koutinas, A. (2015). Bacterial Cellulose Production from Industrial Waste and by-Product Streams. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160714832
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.