Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepatotoxicity by Drugs: The Most Common Implicated Agents

Björnsson, Einar·2016·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an underreported and underestimated adverse drug reaction. Information on the documented hepatotoxicity of drugs has recently been made available by a website that can be accessed in the public domain: LiverTox (http://livertox.nlm.nih.gov). According to critical analysis of the hepatotoxicity of drugs in LiverTox, 53% of drugs had at least one case report of convincing reports of liver injury. Only 48 drugs had more than 50 case reports of DILI. Amoxicillin-clavulanate is the most commonly implicated agent leading to DILI in the prospective series. In a recent prospective study, liver injury due to amoxicillin-clavulanate was found to occur in approximately one out of 2300 users. Drugs with the highest risk of DILI in this study were azathioprine and infliximab.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijms17020224

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Bjornsson, 2015, Discrepancies in liver disease labeling in the package inserts of commonly prescribed medications, Gastroenterology, 148, 269, 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.007 · DOI
  2. Andrade, 2009, Rechallenge in drug-induced liver injury: The attractive hazard, Expert Opin. Drug Saf., 8, 709, 10.1517/14740330903397378 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Papay, 2009, Drug-induced liver injury following positive drug rechallenge, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 54, 84, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.03.003 · DOI
  4. Sciff, E.R., Sorrell, M.F., and Maddrey, W.C. (1999). Diseases of the Liver, Schiff’s Lippincott-Raven Publishers. [8th ed.].
  5. Agarwal, 2010, Important elements for the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury, Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 8, 463, 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.02.008 · DOI
  6. Björnsson, E.S., and Hoofnagle, J.H. (2015). Categorization of drugs implicated in causing liver injury: Critical assessment based upon published case reports. Hepatology. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Danan, G., and Teschke, R. (2016). RUCAM in drug and herb induced liver injury: The update. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 17. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Senior, 2014, Evolution of the Food and Drug Administration approach to liver safety assessment for new drugs: Current status and challenges, Drug Saf., 37, S9, 10.1007/s40264-014-0182-7 · DOI
  9. Andrade, 2005, Drug-induced liver injury: An analysis of 461 incidences submitted to the Spanish registry over a 10-year period, Gastroenterology, 129, 512, 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.006 · DOI
  10. Chalasani, 2008, Causes, clinical features, and outcomes from a prospective study of drug-induced liver injury in the United States, Gastroenterology, 135, 1924, 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.011 · DOI
  11. Olsson, 2005, Outcome and prognostic markers in severe drug-induced liver disease, Hepatology, 42, 481, 10.1002/hep.20800 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Devarbhavi, 2010, Single-center experience with drug-induced liver injury from India: Causes, outcome, prognosis, and predictors of mortality, Am. J. Gastroenterol., 105, 2396, 10.1038/ajg.2010.287 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Leaf, 1997, Severe hepatitis in three AIDS patients treated with indinavir, Lancet, 349, 924, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62700-6 · DOI
  14. Vergis, 1998, Indinavir-associated hepatitis in patients with advanced HIV infection, Int. J. STD AIDS, 9, 53, 10.1258/0956462981920883 · DOI
  15. Pavel, 2007, Severe liver toxicity in postexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection with a zidovudine, lamivudine and fosamprenavir/ritonavir regimen, AIDS, 21, 268, 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328011aa35 · DOI
  16. Chalasani, 2015, Features and outcomes of 889 patients with drug-induced liver injury: The DILIN prospective study, Gastroenterology, 148, 1340, 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Suzuki, 2010, Unified list of drugs causing hepatotoxicity and the reporting frequency of liver events in the WHO vigibaset: International collaborative work, Drug Saf., 33, 503, 10.2165/11535340-000000000-00000 · DOI
  18. 1993, The increased risk of hospitalizations for acute liver injury in a population with exposure to multiple drugs, Epidemiology, 4, 496, 10.1097/00001648-199311000-00004 · DOI
  19. Jick, 1997, A review of epidemiologic research on drug-induced acute liver injury using the general practice research data base in the United Kingdom, Pharmacotherapy, 17, 721, 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1997.tb03747.x · DOI
  20. Montero, 2004, Acute and clinically relevant drug-induced liver injury: A population based case-control study, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 58, 71, 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02133.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Björnsson, E.
Affiliations
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The National University Hospital of Iceland and The Faculty of Medicine, The University of Iceland, 108 Reykjavik, Iceland
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-02-06
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
224
ISSN
1422-0067
Cited by
254
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review