The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Short-Term Local Adaptation of Historical Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties and Implications for In Situ Management of Bean Diversity
Open accessAbstract
Recognizing both the stakes of traditional European common bean diversity and the role farmers’ and gardeners’ networks play in maintaining this diversity, the present study examines the role that local adaptation plays for the management of common bean diversity in situ. To the purpose, four historical bean varieties and one modern control were multiplied on two organic farms for three growing seasons. The fifteen resulting populations, the initial ones and two populations of each variety obtained after the three years of multiplication, were then grown in a common garden. Twenty-two Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers and 13 phenotypic traits were assessed. In total, 68.2% of tested markers were polymorphic and a total of 66 different alleles were identified. FST analysis showed that the genetic composition of two varieties multiplied in different environments changed. At the phenotypic level, differences were observed in flowering date and leaf length. Results indicate that three years of multiplication suffice for local adaptation to occur. The spatial dynamics of genetic and phenotypic bean diversity imply that the maintenance of diversity should be considered at the scale of the network, rather than individual farms and gardens. The microevolution of bean populations within networks of gardens and farms emerges as a research perspective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,908
Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study
EVANNO, G., REGNAUT, S., & GOUDET, J. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02553.x · Cited by 21,895
genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research
PEAKALL, R., & SMOUSE, P. E. (2006) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x · Cited by 16,589
EXCOFFIER, L., & LISCHER, H. E. L. (2010) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x · Cited by 16,326
Peakall, R., & Smouse, P. E. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 · Cited by 13,131
Earl, D. A., & vonHoldt, B. M. (2012) · Conservation Genetics Resources · doi:10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 · Cited by 12,340
The interplay between habitat availability and population differentiation
Verkuil, Y. I., Piersma, T., Jukema, J., Zwarts, L., Baker, A. J., & Hooijmeijer, J. C. E. W. (2012) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · Cited by 6,547
Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans
Lenth, R. V. (2016) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v069.i01 · Cited by 5,075
distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure
Rosenberg, N. A. (2004) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x · Cited by 4,950
Deciphering the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Disease-Suppressive Bacteria
Mendes, R., Kruijt, M., de Bruijn, I., Dekkers, E., van der Voort, M., Schneider, J. H. M., Piceno, Y. M., DeSantis, T. Z., Andersen, G. L., Bakker, P. A. H. M., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1203980 · Cited by 2,800
Cited by
The interplay of ROS and the PI3K/Akt pathway in autophagy regulation
Kma, L., & Baruah, T. J. (2022) · Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/bab.2104 · Cited by 394
Therapeutic Potential of Centella asiatica and Its Triterpenes: A Review
Sun, B., Wu, L., Wu, Y., Zhang, C., Qin, L., Hayashi, M., Kudo, M., Gao, M., & Liu, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.568032 · Cited by 353
The Oral Microbiome and Cancer
Irfan, M., Delgado, R. Z. R., & Frias-Lopez, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.591088 · Cited by 341
Gut reactions: Breaking down xenobiotic–microbiome interactions
Clarke, G., Sandhu, K. V., Griffin, B. T., Dinan, T. G., Cryan, J. F., & Hyland, N. P. (2019) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.118.015768 · Cited by 319
Soto-Angona, Ó., Anmella, G., Valdés-Florido, M. J., De Uribe-Viloria, N., Carvalho, A. F., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Berk, M. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01713-8 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Klaedtke, S., Caproni, L., Klauck, J., De la Grandville, P., Dutartre, M., Stassart, P., Chable, V., Negri, V., & Raggi, L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-02-28
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 493
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2594207899
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 69.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short-Term Local Adaptation of Historical Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties and Implications for In Situ Management of Bean Diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijms18030493
- The paper
- Klaedtke, S., Caproni, L., Klauck, J., De la Grandville, P., Dutartre, M., Stassart, P., Chable, V., Negri, V., & Raggi, L. (2017). Short-Term Local Adaptation of Historical Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties and Implications for In Situ Management of Bean Diversity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030493
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.