Integration of Data from Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation Databases Highlights Concentration and Dosage Sensitivity of LLPS Drivers
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a molecular process that leads to the formation of membraneless organelles, representing functionally specialized liquid-like cellular condensates formed by proteins and nucleic acids. Integrating the data on LLPS-associated proteins from dedicated databases revealed only modest agreement between them and yielded a high-confidence dataset of 89 human LLPS drivers. Analysis of the supporting evidence for our dataset uncovered a systematic and potentially concerning difference between protein concentrations used in a good fraction of the in vitro LLPS experiments, a key parameter that governs the phase behavior, and the proteomics-derived cellular abundance levels of the corresponding proteins. Closer scrutiny of the underlying experimental data enabled us to offer a sound rationale for this systematic difference, which draws on our current understanding of the cellular organization of the proteome and the LLPS process. In support of this rationale, we find that genes coding for our human LLPS drivers tend to be dosage-sensitive, suggesting that their cellular availability is tightly regulated to preserve their functional role in direct or indirect relation to condensate formation. Our analysis offers guideposts for increasing agreement between in vitro and in vivo studies, probing the roles of proteins in LLPS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Kato, M., Han, T. W., Xie, S., Shi, K., Du, X., Wu, L. C., Mirzaei, H., Goldsmith, E. J., Longgood, J., Pei, J., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.017 · Cited by 2,012 · see citing works
A “Proteomic Ruler” for Protein Copy Number and Concentration Estimation without Spike-in Standards
Wiśniewski, J. R., Hein, M. Y., Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2014) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m113.037309 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Milo, R. (2013) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201300066 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
The Human Transcription Factors
Lambert, S. A., Jolma, A., Campitelli, L. F., Das, P. K., Yin, Y., Albu, M., Chen, X., Taipale, J., Hughes, T. R., & Weirauch, M. T. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.045 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Proteomic Analysis of in Vivo Phosphorylated Synaptic Proteins
Collins, M. O., Yu, L., Coba, M. P., Husi, H., Campuzano, I., Blackstock, W. P., Choudhary, J. S., & Grant, S. G. N. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m411220200 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Rapid empirical discovery of optimal peptides for targeted proteomics
Stergachis, A. B., MacLean, B., Lee, K., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., & MacCoss, M. J. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1770 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Protein language model identifies disordered, conserved motifs implicated in phase separation
Zhang, Y., Zheng, J., & Zhang, B. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105309 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…of MLO-hProt using a pLDDT score ≤70 and partitioned these regions into two categories: drivers (dMLO-hIDR), which actively drive phase separation, and clients (cMLO-hIDR), which are present in MLOs under certain conditions but do not promote phase separation themselves ( Farahi et al., 2021 ).”
- Authors
- Farahi, N., Lazar, T., Wodak, S. J., Tompa, P., & Pancsa, R.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- VIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, Flemish Institute for Biotechnology, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
- Institute of Molecular Life Sciences (HU)
- Corresponding author
- Pancsa, Rita
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-03-16
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3017
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8002189
- OpenAlex
- W3138274236
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (SRP51)
- Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (K124670, K131702, FK128133)
- Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (PREMIUM‐2017‐48)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- liquid-liquid phase separation, biomolecular condensates, protein concentration, dosage sensitivity, human protein, proteomics data integration
- MeSH terms
- Genes, Humans, Proteins, Organelles, Databases, Factual, Gene Dosage, Proteome, Phase Transition, Molecular Sequence Annotation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review