Microbial Consortia and Mixed Plastic Waste: Pangenomic Analysis Reveals Potential for Degradation of Multiple Plastic Types via Previously Identified PET Degrading Bacteria
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The global utilization of single-use, non-biodegradable plastics, such as bottles made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), has contributed to catastrophic levels of plastic pollution. Fortunately, microbial communities are adapting to assimilate plastic waste. Previously, our work showed a full consortium of five bacteria capable of synergistically degrading PET. Using omics approaches, we identified the key genes implicated in PET degradation within the consortium’s pangenome and transcriptome. This analysis led to the discovery of a novel PETase, EstB, which has been observed to hydrolyze the oligomer BHET and the polymer PET. Besides the genes implicated in PET degradation, many other biodegradation genes were discovered. Over 200 plastic and plasticizer degradation-related genes were discovered through the Plastic Microbial Biodegradation Database (PMBD). Diverse carbon source utilization was observed by a microbial community-based assay, which, paired with an abundant number of plastic- and plasticizer-degrading enzymes, indicates a promising possibility for mixed plastic degradation. Using RNAseq differential analysis, several genes were predicted to be involved in PET degradation, including aldehyde dehydrogenases and several classes of hydrolases. Active transcription of PET monomer metabolism was also observed, including the generation of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA)/polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) biopolymers. These results present an exciting opportunity for the bio-recycling of mixed plastic waste with upcycling potential.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., & Purnell, P. (2018) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.014 · Cited by 3,873 · see citing works
Plastics: Environmental and Biotechnological Perspectives on Microbial Degradation
Danso, D., Chow, J., & Streit, W. R. (2019) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01095-19 · Cited by 918 · see citing works
Estimating the size distribution of plastics ingested by animals
Jâms, I. B., Windsor, F. M., Poudevigne-Durance, T., Ormerod, S. J., & Durance, I. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15406-6 · Cited by 223 · cited 1× · see citing works
“They have been found within humans [6] and many other organisms [7], in virtually all the environmental locations that have been tested [8–10], and even dispersed in rainwater [11].”
BackgroundPhthalate exposure and long-term epigenomic consequences: a review
Dutta, S., Haggerty, D. K., Rappolee, D. A., & Ruden, D. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00405 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Insights into the prevalence and impacts of phthalate esters in aquatic ecosystems
Baloyi, N. D., Tekere, M., Maphangwa, K. W., & Masindi, V. (2021) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2021.684190 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Edwards, S., León-Zayas, R., Ditter, R., Laster, H., Sheehan, G., Anderson, O., Beattie, T., & Mellies, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Reed College (US)
- Biology Department, Willamette University, Salem, OR 97301, USA
- Willamette University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mellies, Jay L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-05-17
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5612
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9146961
- OpenAlex
- W4280589679
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NSF RUI Collaborative (1931150)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Keywords
- polyethylene terephthalate degradation, PETase, plastic waste biodegradation, microbial consortia, pan-genome, mixed plastic waste, plastic recycling, plastic pollution
- MeSH terms
- Bacteria, Plasticizers, Plastics, Polyethylene Terephthalates, Microbial Consortia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review