The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanism of staphylococcal resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These modifications are mediated by a cluster of resistance genes known as the van cluster, with vanA and vanB being the most frequently identified [175].”
From Staphylococcus aureus: A Review of the Pathogenesis and Virulence Mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [175]
In the citing paper
“However, the most significant strategy is enzymatic inactivation, where AMEs chemically alter aminoglycosides, neutralizing their antimicrobial effects [175].”
From Staphylococcus aureus: A Review of the Pathogenesis and Virulence Mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [175]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance
Munita, J. M., & Arias, C. A. (2016) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.vmbf-0016-2015 · Cited by 2,782
David, M. Z., & Daum, R. S. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00081-09 · Cited by 1,972
Ribosome-targeting antibiotics and mechanisms of bacterial resistance
Wilson, D. N. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3155 · Cited by 1,054
The Pathogenesis of Sepsis and Potential Therapeutic Targets
Huang, M., Cai, S., & Su, J. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20215376 · Cited by 776
Ribosomal Protection Proteins and Their Mechanism ofTetracyclineResistance
Connell, S. R., Tracz, D. M., Nierhaus, K. H., & Taylor, D. E. (2003) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.47.12.3675-3681.2003 · Cited by 449
Antibiotic perturbations to the gut microbiome
Fishbein, S. R. S., Mahmud, B., & Dantas, G. (2023) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-023-00933-y · Cited by 440
Molecular Mechanisms of Drug Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, B., Kowalewski, C., Krolak-Ulinska, A., & Marusza, W. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23158088 · Cited by 412
Research works printed but not linked: 204
- Lai, 2022, Overcoming the rising incidence and evolving mechanisms of antibiotic resistance by novel drug delivery approaches – an overview, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 181, 10.1016/j.addr.2021.114078 · DOI
- Davies, 2010, Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 74, 417, 10.1128/MMBR.00016-10 · DOI · Paper page
- Ratia, 2022, Gold-derived molecules as new antimicrobial agents, Front. Microbiol., 13, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.846959 · DOI
- Jensen, 2009, Genetics of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, Future Microbiol., 4, 565, 10.2217/fmb.09.30 · DOI · Paper page
- Gaynes, 2017, The discovery of penicillin—new insights after more than 75 years of clinical use, Emerg. Infect. Dis., 23, 849, 10.3201/eid2305.161556 · DOI · Paper page
- Rammelkamp, 1942, Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to the Action of Penicillin. Proceedings of the Society for, Exp. Biol. Med., 51, 386, 10.3181/00379727-51-13986 · DOI · Paper page
- Peacock, 2015, Mechanisms of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 84, 577, 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034516 · DOI · Paper page
- Barber, 1961, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococci, J. Clin. Pathol., 14, 385, 10.1136/jcp.14.4.385 · DOI · Paper page
- Bishara, 2012, Healthcare-associated vs. hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, Int. J. Infect. Dis., 16, e457, 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.02.009 · DOI
- Tsuji, 2007, Community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a comparison of molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial activities of various agents, Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 58, 41, 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.10.021 · DOI
- Newman, 2015, Chapter 5 - Natural Products as Pharmaceuticals and Sources for Lead Structures, 101
- Guo, 2020, Prevalence and therapies of antibiotic-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 10, 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00107 · DOI · Paper page
- Lade, 2022, Molecular basis of non-β-lactam antibiotics resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, Antibiot. (Basel), 11
- Kahlmeter, 2019, Point-counterpoint: differences between the european committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing and clinical and laboratory standards institute recommendations for reporting antimicrobial susceptibility results, J. Clin. Microbiol., 57, 10.1128/JCM.01129-19 · DOI
- Costa, 2017, Evolution of antimicrobial resistance in Europe: a factual review, J. Allergy Ther., 8, 1
- Fernández, 2011, Creeping baselines and adaptive resistance to antibiotics, Drug Resist. Updates, 14, 1, 10.1016/j.drup.2011.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Ramirez, 2010, Aminoglycoside modifying enzymes, Drug Resist. Updates, 13, 151, 10.1016/j.drup.2010.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Douglas, 2023, Staph wars: the antibiotic pipeline strikes back, Microbiol. (Read. ), 169
- Chen, 2023, A review of current antibiotic resistance and promising antibiotics with novel modes of action to combat antibiotic resistance, Arch. Microbiol., 205, 356, 10.1007/s00203-023-03699-2 · DOI
- Navratna, 2010, Molecular basis for the role of Staphylococcus aureus Penicillin Binding Protein 4 in Antimicrobial Resistance, J. Bacteriol., 192, 134, 10.1128/JB.00822-09 · doi:10.1128/jb.00822-09
- Berti, 2013, β-lactam antibiotics targeting PBP1 selectively enhance daptomycin activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 57, 5005, 10.1128/AAC.00594-13 · DOI
- Pinho, 2000, Cloning, characterization, and inactivation of the gene pbpC, encoding penicillin-binding protein 3 of Staphylococcus aureus, J. Bacteriol., 182, 1074, 10.1128/JB.182.4.1074-1079.2000 · DOI
- Henze, 1995, Staphylococcus aureus penicillin-binding protein 4 and intrinsic beta-lactam resistance, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 39, 2415, 10.1128/AAC.39.11.2415 · DOI
- Fisher, 2016, β-lactam resistance mechanisms: gram-positive bacteria and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., 6, 10.1101/cshperspect.a025221 · DOI
- da Costa, 2018, PBP4: a new perspective on Staphylococcus aureus β-Lactam Resistance, Microorg. (Basel), 6, 57, 10.3390/microorganisms6030057 · DOI
- Ferrer-González, 2017, β-lactam antibiotics with a high affinity for PBP2 act Synergistically with the FtsZ-Targeting Agent TXA707 against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 61, e00863, 10.1128/AAC.00863-17 · DOI
- Foster, 2017, Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Current status and future prospects, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 41, 430, 10.1093/femsre/fux007 · DOI · Paper page
- Lowy, 2003, Antimicrobial resistance: the example of Staphylococcus aureus, J. Clin. Investig., 111, 1265, 10.1172/JCI18535 · DOI · Paper page
- Alexander, 2023, Structural basis of broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, Nat. (Lond. ), 613, 375, 10.1038/s41586-022-05583-3 · DOI
- Hartman, 1984, Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, J. Bacteriol., 158, 513, 10.1128/jb.158.2.513-516.1984 · DOI · Paper page
- Utsui, 1985, Role of an altered penicillin-binding protein in methicillin- and cephem-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 28, 397, 10.1128/AAC.28.3.397 · DOI · Paper page
- Strynadka, 2002, Structural basis for the β lactam resistance of PBP2a from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Nat. Struct. Biol., 9, 870
- Zuniga, 2020, Expression of genes encoding resistance in Staphylococcus spp. isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis in Brazil, J. Infect. Dev. Ctries., 14, 772, 10.3855/jidc.12611 · doi:10.3855/jidc.12611
- Uddin, 2017, Associations between resistance phenotype and gene expression in response to serial exposure to oxacillin and ciprofloxacin in Staphylococcus aureus, Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 65, 462, 10.1111/lam.12808 · doi:10.1111/lam.12808
- Rosato, 2003, mecA-blaZ corepressors in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 47, 1460, 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1460-1463.2003 · DOI
- Paterson, 2013, The emergence of mecC methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Trends Microbiol. (Regul. Ed. ), 22, 42, 10.1016/j.tim.2013.11.003 · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2013.11.003
- McClure, 2020, A novel assay for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from clinical samples, Front. Microbiol., 11
- Lozano, 2020, Human mecC-Carrying MRSA: clinical implications and risk factors, Microorg. (Basel), 8, 1615, 10.3390/microorganisms8101615 · DOI
- Hryniewicz, 2017, Borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) - a more common problem than expected?, J. Med. Microbiol., 66, 10.1099/jmm.0.000585 · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.000585
- Nomura, 2020, A class A β-lactamase produced by borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hydrolyses oxacillin, J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist., 22, 244, 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.03.002 · DOI
- Gitman, 2021, Modified methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus detected in neonatal intensive care patients, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 76, 2774, 10.1093/jac/dkab266 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkab266
- Memmi, 2008, Staphylococcus aureus PBP4 is essential for beta-lactam resistance in community-acquired methicillin-resistant strains, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 52, 3955, 10.1128/AAC.00049-08 · DOI · Paper page
- Hamilton, 2017, High-level resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics Mediated by Penicillin-binding Protein 4 (PBP4), Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 61, 10.1128/AAC.02727-16 · DOI
- Argudín, 2018, Genetic diversity among staphylococcus aureus isolates showing oxacillin and/or cefoxitin resistance not linked to the presence of mec Genes, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 62, 10.1128/AAC.00091-18 · DOI · Paper page
- Chatterjee, 2017, PBP4 Mediates β-lactam resistance by altered function, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 61, 10.1128/AAC.00932-17 · DOI
- Duplessis, 2011, Ceftaroline: a new cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Clin. Med. Rev. Ther., 3, 1
- Acebrón, 2015, The allosteric site for the nascent cell wall in penicillin-binding protein 2a: an achilles' heel of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Curr. Med. Chem., 22, 1678, 10.2174/0929867322666150311150215 · DOI
- Greninger, 2016, Whole-genome sequencing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus resistant to fifth-generation cephalosporins reveals potential Non-mecA Mechanisms of Resistance, PloS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0149541 · DOI · Paper page
- Chan, 2015, Ceftobiprole- and ceftaroline-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 59, 2960, 10.1128/AAC.05004-14 · doi:10.1128/aac.05004-14
- Liu, 2021, Emerging resistance mechanisms for 4 types of common anti-MRSA antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus: a comprehensive review, Microb. Pathog., 156, 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104915 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhanel, 2010, New Lipoglycopeptides: a comparative review of dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin, Drugs (N. Y., N. Y. ), 70, 859
- Szemraj, 2022, Vancomycin heteroresistance among methicillin-resistant clinical isolates S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, S. simulans, and S. warneri, Braz. J. Microbiol.
- Peschel, 2000, The d-alanine residues ofstaphylococcus aureus teichoic acids alter the susceptibility to vancomycin and the activity of autolytic enzymes, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 44, 2845, 10.1128/AAC.44.10.2845-2847.2000 · DOI · Paper page
- Beauregard, 1995, Dimerization and membrane anchors in extracellular targeting of vancomycin group antibiotics, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 39, 781, 10.1128/AAC.39.3.781 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhanel, 2012, Oritavancin: mechanism of action, Clin. Infect. Dis., 54, S214, 10.1093/cid/cir920 · DOI · Paper page
- Cong, 2019, Vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a review of case updating and clinical features, J. Adv. Res., 21
- Perichon, 2009, VanA-type vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 53, 4580, 10.1128/AAC.00346-09 · DOI · Paper page
- Jacoby, G. Correction to: Transmissible Antibiotic Resistance. 2019. · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78538-7_25
- Thaker, 2015, Vancomycin-variable enterococci can give rise to constitutive resistance during antibiotic therapy, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 59, 1405, 10.1128/AAC.04490-14 · DOI
- Melo-Cristino, 2013, First case of infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe, Lancet, 382, 205, 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61219-2 · DOI
- Hiramatsu, 2014, Vancomycin-intermediate resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist., 2, 213, 10.1016/j.jgar.2014.04.006 · DOI
- Delaune, 2012, The WalKR system controls major Staphylococcal virulence genes and is involved in triggering the host inflammatory response, Infect. Immun., 80, 3438, 10.1128/IAI.00195-12 · DOI · Paper page
- Yin, 2006, VraSR Two-component regulatory system and its role in induction of pbp2 and vraSR expression by cell wall antimicrobials in Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 50, 336, 10.1128/AAC.50.1.336-343.2006 · DOI
- Chen, 2021, The role of graRS in regulating virulence and antimicrobial resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Front. Microbiol., 12
- Zhu, 2021, A novel mutation of walK confers vancomycin-intermediate resistance in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, Int. J. Med. Microbiol., 311, 10.1016/j.ijmm.2021.151473 · DOI
- Crotty, 2016, New gram-positive agents: the next generation of oxazolidinones and Lipoglycopeptides, J. Clin. Microbiol., 54, 2225, 10.1128/JCM.03395-15 · doi:10.1128/jcm.03395-15
- Gonzalez-Ruiz, 2011, Clinical experience with daptomycin in Europe: The first 2.5 years, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 66, 912, 10.1093/jac/dkq528 · DOI
- Grein, 2020, Ca2+-Daptomycin targets cell wall biosynthesis by forming a tripartite complex with undecaprenyl-coupled intermediates and membrane lipids, Nat. Commun., 11, 10.1038/s41467-020-15257-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Heidary, 2018, Daptomycin, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 73, 1, 10.1093/jac/dkx349 · DOI · Paper page
- Gray, 2020, More than a pore: a current perspective on the in vivo mode of action of the lipopeptide antibiotic daptomycin, Antibiotics, 9, 10.3390/antibiotics9010017 · DOI
- Grünewald, 2004, Synthesis and derivatization of daptomycin: a chemoenzymatic route to acidic lipopeptide antibiotics, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 17025, 10.1021/ja045455t · DOI
- Gómez Casanova, 2017, Mechanisms of resistance to daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus, Rev. Esp. Quimioter., 30, 391
- Gutiérrez-Chávez, 2021, The ecological roles of microbial lipopeptides: Where are we going?, Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J., 19, 1400, 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.017 · DOI
- Zhang, 2014, Cardiolipin prevents membrane translocation and permeabilization by daptomycin, J. Biol. Chem., 289, 11584, 10.1074/jbc.M114.554444 · DOI · Paper page
- Miller, 2016, Mechanism of action and resistance to daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococci, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., 6, 10.1101/cshperspect.a026997 · DOI · Paper page
- Bayer, 2013, Mechanisms of daptomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: role of the cell membrane and cell wall, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1277, 139, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06819.x · DOI · Paper page
- Bayer, 2015, Frequency and distribution of single-nucleotide polymorphisms within mprF in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates and their role in cross-resistance to daptomycin and host defense antimicrobial peptides, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 59, 4930, 10.1128/AAC.00970-15 · DOI
- Cafiso, 2014, dltA overexpression: A strain-independent keystone of daptomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 43, 26, 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.10.001 · DOI
- Kattke, M., Gosschalk, J., Martinez, O., Kumar, G., Gale, R., Cascio, D., Sawaya, M., Phillips, M., Brown, E., Clubb, R., 2018. Structure and mechanism of TagA, a novel membrane-associated glycosyltransferase that produces wall teichoic acids in pathogenic bacteria; 2018. DOI: 10.1101/507483 10.1101/507483.. · DOI
- Bertsche, 2013, Increased cell wall teichoic acid production and D-alanylation are common phenotypes among daptomycin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates, PLoS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0067398 · DOI
- Koprivnjak, 2011, Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Cardiolipin Synthases 1 and 2 and their contribution to accumulation of cardiolipin in stationary phase and within phagocytes, J. Bacteriol., 193, 4134, 10.1128/JB.00288-11 · DOI
- Lasek-Nesselquist, 2019, Insights into the evolution of staphylococcus aureus daptomycin resistance from an in vitro bioreactor model, Front. Microbiol., 10, 345, 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00345 · DOI
- Zhang, 2014, Cardiolipin prevents membrane translocation and permeabilization by daptomycin, J. Biol. Chem., 289
- Bæk, 2015, Stepwise decrease in daptomycin susceptibility in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with an initial mutation in rpoB and a compensatory inactivation of the clpX gene, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 59, 6983, 10.1128/AAC.01303-15 · DOI
- Howden, 2011, Evolution of multidrug resistance during Staphylococcus aureus infection involves mutation of the essential two component regulator WalKR, PLoS Pathog., 7, 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002359 · DOI · Paper page
- Pader, 2016, Staphylococcus aureus inactivates daptomycin by releasing membrane phospholipids, Nat. Microbiol., 2, 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.194 · DOI
- Pee, C., Pader, V., Ledger, E., Edwards, A., 2018. , A FASII inhibitor prevents staphylococcal evasion of daptomycin by inhibiting phospholipid decoy production; 2018. DOI: 10.1101/427989.. · doi:10.1101/427989
- Krause, 2016, Aminoglycosides: an overview, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., 6, 10.1101/cshperspect.a027029 · DOI · Paper page
- Ramirez, 2017, Amikacin: uses, resistance, and prospects for inhibition, Mol. (Basel, Switz. ), 22, 2267, 10.3390/molecules22122267 · DOI · Paper page
- Stankowicz, M., Ibrahim, J., Brown, D., 2015. Once-daily aminoglycoside dosing: An update on current literature. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy: AJHP: Official Journal of The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2015, 72, 1357-1364. DOI: 10.2146/ajhp140564. · doi:10.2146/ajhp140564
- Serio, 2018, Aminoglycoside revival: review of a historically important class of antimicrobials undergoing rejuvenation, EcoSal, 8
- Zhanel, 2012, Comparison of the next-generation aminoglycoside plazomicin to gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin, Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther., 10, 459, 10.1586/eri.12.25 · DOI · Paper page
- Mingeot-Leclercq, 1999, Aminoglycosides: activity and resistance, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 43, 727, 10.1128/AAC.43.4.727 · DOI · Paper page
- Ramirez, 2017, Amikacin: uses, resistance, and prospects for inhibition, Molecules, 22, 2267, 10.3390/molecules22122267 · DOI · Paper page
- Serio, 2018, Aminoglycoside revival: review of a historically important class of antimicrobials undergoing rejuvenation, EcoSal, 8
- Kong, 2020, Exploration of antibiotic activity of aminoglycosides, in particular ribostamycin alone and in combination with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid against pathogenic bacteria, Front. Microbiol., 11, 1718, 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01718 · DOI
- Webster, 2022, A mini-review: environmental and metabolic factors affecting aminoglycoside efficacy, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 39
- Krause, 2016, Aminoglycosides: an overview, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., 6, a027029, 10.1101/cshperspect.a027029 · DOI · Paper page
- Ramirez, 2010, Aminoglycoside modifying enzymes, Drug Resist. Updates, 13, 151, 10.1016/j.drup.2010.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Doi, 2016, Aminoglycoside resistance: the emergence of acquired 16s ribosomal RNA methyltransferases, Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am., 30, 523, 10.1016/j.idc.2016.02.011 · DOI · Paper page
- Khosravi, 2017, Distribution of genes encoding resistance to aminoglycoside modifying enzymes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains, Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci., 33, 587, 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.08.001 · DOI
- Szymanek-Majchrzak, 2018, Resistance to aminoglycosides of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococcus aureus, originating in the surgical and transplantation wards of the warsaw clinical center—a retrospective analysis, Transplant. Proc., 50, 2170, 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.158 · DOI · Paper page
- Costa, 2019, High Prevalence of the aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2′′)-Ia Gene in Hospital Isolates of Enterococcus faecalis Co-Resistant to Gentamicin and Penicillin, Microb. Drug Resist., 25, 1275, 10.1089/mdr.2018.0466 · DOI
- Frase, 2012, Revisiting the nucleotide and aminoglycoside substrate specificity of the bifunctional aminoglycoside Acetyltransferase(6′)-Ie/Aminoglycoside Phosphotransferase(2″)-Ia Enzyme, J. Biol. Chem., 287, 43262, 10.1074/jbc.M112.416453 · DOI
- Zárate, 2018, Overcoming aminoglycoside enzymatic resistance: design of novel antibiotics and inhibitors, Molecules, 23, 10.3390/molecules23020284 · DOI
- Shakya, 2010, Nucleotide selectivity of antibiotic kinases, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 54, 1909, 10.1128/AAC.01570-09 · DOI
- Kanchugal P, 2020, Structural recognition of spectinomycin by resistance enzyme ANT(9) from Enterococcus faecalis, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 64, 10.1128/AAC.00371-20 · DOI
- Cox, 2018, Plazomicin retains antibiotic activity against most aminoglycoside modifying enzymes, ACS Infect. Dis., 4, 980, 10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00001 · DOI
- Rocha, 2021, Inhibition of Aminoglycoside 6′-N-acetyltransferase Type Ib (AAC(6′)-Ib): structure–activity relationship of substituted pyrrolidine pentamine derivatives as inhibitors, Biomedicines, 9, 1218, 10.3390/biomedicines9091218 · doi:10.3390/biomedicines9091218
- Labby, 2013, Strategies to overcome the action of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes for treating resistant bacterial infections, Future Med. Chem., 5, 1285, 10.4155/fmc.13.80 · DOI
- Quirke, 2022, Structure-Activity Relationships for 5'' Modifications of 4,5-Aminoglycoside Antibiotics, ChemMedChem, 17, 10.1002/cmdc.202200120 · doi:10.1002/cmdc.202200120
- Yan, 2022, Design, Synthesis, and Bioassay of 2′-Modified Kanamycin A, Molecules, 27, 10.3390/molecules27217482 · DOI
- Costa, 2020, Development of peptides that inhibit aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes and β-lactamases for control of resistant bacteria, Curr. Protein Pept. Sci., 21, 1011, 10.2174/1389203721666200915113630 · doi:10.2174/1389203721666200915113630
- Williams, 1979, Synthesis of a tight-binding, multisubstrate analog inhibitor of gentamicin acetyltransferase I, J. Antibiot. (Tokyo), 32, 1147, 10.7164/antibiotics.32.1147 · doi:10.7164/antibiotics.32.1147
- Wang, 2022, Antibiotic combination therapy: a strategy to overcome bacterial resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics, Front. Pharmacol., 13
- Grossman, 2016, Tetracycline Antibiotics and Resistance, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., 6, a025387, 10.1101/cshperspect.a025387 · DOI · Paper page
- Duggar, 1948, Aureomycin; a product of the continuing search for new antibiotics. Annuals, N. Y. Acad. Sci., 51, 177, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1948.tb27262.x · DOI · Paper page
- Finlay, 1950, Terramycin, a new antibiotic, Science, 111, 85, 10.1126/science.111.2874.85.a · doi:10.1126/science.111.2874.85.a
- Nelson, 2011, The history of the tetracyclines. Annuals, N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1241, 17, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06354.x · DOI · Paper page
- McCormick, 1957, A new family of antibiotics: the demethyltetracyclines, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 79, 4561, 10.1021/ja01573a089 · doi:10.1021/ja01573a089
- Rusu, 2021, The development of third-generation tetracycline antibiotics and new perspectives, Pharmaceutics, 13, 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122085 · DOI · Paper page
- Stein, 2006, Tigecycline: a critical analysis, Clin. Infect. Dis., 43, 518, 10.1086/505494 · DOI · Paper page
- Gallagher, 2019, Omadacycline: a modernized tetracycline, Clin. Infect. Dis., 69, S1, 10.1093/cid/ciz394 · doi:10.1093/cid/ciz394
- Coppock, 2018, FDA approves eravacycline for adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections, Pharmacy
- Durães, 2019, Omadacycline: a newly approved antibacterial from the class of tetracyclines, Pharm. (Basel), 12
- Wilson, 2020, Target protection as a key antibiotic resistance mechanism, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 18, 637, 10.1038/s41579-020-0386-z · DOI · Paper page
- Ero, 2021, Ribosome protection proteins—“New” players in the global arms race with antibiotic-resistant pathogens, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22, 10.3390/ijms22105356 · DOI
- Dönhöfer, 2012, Structural basis for TetM-mediated tetracycline resistance, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, 16900, 10.1073/pnas.1208037109 · DOI · Paper page
- Arenz, 2015, Cryo-EM structure of the tetracycline resistance protein TetM in complex with a translating ribosome at 3.9-å resolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 112, 5401, 10.1073/pnas.1501775112 · DOI
- Burdett, 1996, Tet(M)-promoted release of tetracycline from ribosomes is GTP dependent, J. Bacteriol., 178, 3246, 10.1128/jb.178.11.3246-3251.1996 · DOI · Paper page
- Nguyen, 2014, Tetracycline antibiotics and resistance mechanisms, Biol. Chem., 395, 559, 10.1515/hsz-2013-0292 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhang, 2022, Dissemination and prevalence of plasmid-mediated high-level tigecycline resistance gene tet (X4), Front. Microbiol., 13
- Kannan, 2011, Macrolide antibiotics in the ribosome exit tunnel: species-specific binding and action. Annuals, N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1241, 33, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06315.x · DOI
- Miklasińska-Majdanik, 2021, Mechanisms of resistance to macrolide antibiotics among Staphylococcus aureus, Antibiotics, 10, 1406, 10.3390/antibiotics10111406 · DOI · Paper page
- Schwarz, 2016, Lincosamides, streptogramins, phenicols, and pleuromutilins: mode of action and mechanisms of resistance, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., 6, 10.1101/cshperspect.a027037 · DOI
- Tenson, 2003, The mechanism of action of macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin B reveals the nascent peptide exit path in the ribosome, J. Mol. Biol., 330, 1005, 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00662-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Feßler, 2018, Mobile macrolide resistance genes in staphylococci, Plasmid, 99, 2, 10.1016/j.plasmid.2018.05.001 · DOI
- Galarion, 2023, The native ABC-F proteins of Staphylococcus aureus do not contribute to intrinsic resistance against ribosome-targeting antibacterial drugs, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 78, 2601, 10.1093/jac/dkad238 · DOI
- Sharkey, 2016, ABC-F proteins mediate antibiotic resistance through ribosomal protection, mBio, 7, 10.1128/mBio.01975-15 · DOI · Paper page
- Ero, 2019, Ribosome protection by ABC-F proteins-molecular mechanism and potential drug design, Protein Sci., 28, 684, 10.1002/pro.3589 · DOI
- Vimberg, 2020, Ribosome-mediated attenuation of vga(A) expression is shaped by the antibiotic resistance specificity of Vga(A) Protein Variants, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 64, 10.1128/AAC.00666-20 · DOI
- Izard, 2001, Structural basis for chloramphenicol tolerance in Streptomyces venezuelae by chloramphenicol phosphotransferase activity, Protein Sci., 10, 1508, 10.1002/pro.101508 · doi:10.1002/pro.101508
- Foti, 2021, Oxazolidinone antibiotics: chemical, biological and analytical aspects, Molecules, 26, 10.3390/molecules26144280 · DOI · Paper page
- Paukner, 2017, Pleuromutilins: potent drugs for resistant bugs-mode of action and resistance, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., 7, 10.1101/cshperspect.a027110 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhanel, 2021, Lefamulin: a novel oral and intravenous pleuromutilin for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, Drugs, 81, 233, 10.1007/s40265-020-01443-4 · DOI
- Mohamad, 2022, Sal-type ABC-F proteins: intrinsic and common mediators of pleuromutilin resistance by target protection in staphylococci, Nucleic Acids Res., 50, 2128, 10.1093/nar/gkac058 · DOI
- Khoshnood, 2019, A review on mechanism of action, resistance, synergism, and clinical implications of mupirocin against Staphylococcus aureus, Biomed. Pharmacother., 109, 1809, 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.131 · DOI
- Westgeest, 2024, Eradication of community-onset Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage: a narrative review, Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.01.003 · DOI
- Tucaliuc, 2019, Mupirocin: applications and production, Biotechnol. Lett., 41, 495, 10.1007/s10529-019-02670-w · doi:10.1007/s10529-019-02670-w
- Dadashi, 2020, Mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist., 20, 238, 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.032 · doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.032
- Wang, 2022, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in China: a multicentre longitudinal study and whole-genome sequencing, Emerg. Microbes Infect., 11, 532, 10.1080/22221751.2022.2032373 · DOI · Paper page
- González-López, 2024, Structures of the Staphylococcus aureus ribosome inhibited by fusidic acid and fusidic acid cyclopentane, Sci. Rep., 14, 10.1038/s41598-024-64868-x · DOI
- Fernandes, 2016, Fusidic acid: a bacterial elongation factor inhibitor for the oral treatment of acute and chronic staphylococcal infections, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med., 6, a025437, 10.1101/cshperspect.a025437 · DOI
- Lesher, 1962, 1,8-naphthyridine derivatives. A new class of chemotherapeutic agents, J. Med. Pharm. Chem., 5, 1063, 10.1021/jm01240a021 · DOI · Paper page
- Correia, 2017, Mechanisms of quinolone action and resistance: where do we stand?, J. Med. Microbiol., 66, 551, 10.1099/jmm.0.000475 · DOI · Paper page
- Baggio, 2021, Fluoroquinolone antibiotics and adverse events, Aust. Prescr., 44, 161, 10.18773/austprescr.2021.035 · DOI · Paper page
- Aldred, 2014, Mechanism of quinolone action and resistance, Biochemistry, 53, 1565, 10.1021/bi5000564 · DOI · Paper page
- Tang, 2023, Quinolone antibiotics: resistance and therapy, Infect. Drug Resist., 16, 811, 10.2147/IDR.S401663 · DOI
- Shariati, 2022, The resistance mechanisms of bacteria against ciprofloxacin and new approaches for enhancing the efficacy of this antibiotic, Front. Public Health, 10, 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1025633 · DOI · Paper page
- Pham, 2019, Quinolone antibiotics, MedChemComm, 10, 1719, 10.1039/C9MD00120D · DOI · Paper page
- Huynh, 2023, Genomic alterations involved in fluoroquinolone resistance development in Staphylococcus aureus, PLoS One, 18, 10.1371/journal.pone.0287973 · DOI
- Hamza, 2023, Molecular investigation of quinolone-resistant genes among clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Babylon hospitals, Med. J. Babylon., 20, 553, 10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_347_23 · doi:10.4103/mjbl.mjbl_347_23
- Masters, 2003, Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole revisited, Arch. Intern. Med., 163, 402, 10.1001/archinte.163.4.402 · DOI · Paper page
- Stevens, 2014, Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the infectious diseases society of America, Clin. Infect. Dis., 59, e10, 10.1093/cid/ciu296 · DOI · Paper page
- Haseeb, 2022, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim) dose optimization in Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia (PCP) Management: a systematic review, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19, 10.3390/ijerph19052833 · DOI
- McCarter, 2017, Antibiotics: challenges, mechanisms, opportunities Written by Christopher Walsh, PhD and Timothy Wencewicz, PhD, Lab. Med., 48, 10.1093/labmed/lmw070 · doi:10.1093/labmed/lmw070
- Goldberg, 2012, Contemporary unconventional clinical use of co-trimoxazole, Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 18, 8, 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03613.x · DOI
- Sensi, 1960, A new antibiotic of the rifomycin family, Farm. Sci., 15, 228
- Hardie, 2022, JMM profile: rifampicin: a broad-spectrum antibiotic, J. Med. Microbiol., 71, 10.1099/jmm.0.001566 · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.001566
- Wang, 2019, Evolution of resistance mechanisms and biological characteristics of rifampicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains selected in vitro, BMC Microbiol., 19, 220, 10.1186/s12866-019-1573-9 · DOI
- Zheng, 2021, Resistance profiles and biological characteristics of rifampicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants, Infect. Drug Resist., 14, 1527, 10.2147/IDR.S301863 · DOI
- Zhang, 2023, The development of variation-based rifampicin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus deciphered through genomic and transcriptomic study, J. Hazard. Mater., 442, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130112 · DOI
- Lee, 2022, Rifamycin resistance, rpoB gene mutation and clinical outcomes of Staphylococcus species isolates from prosthetic joint infections in Republic of Korea, J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist., 28, 43, 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.12.005 · doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2021.12.005
- Dashtbani-Roozbehani, 2021, Efflux pump mediated antimicrobial resistance by Staphylococci in Health-Related Environments: Challenges and the Quest for Inhibition, Antibiot. (Basel), 10
- Alnaseri, 2015, Inducible expression of a resistance-nodulation-division-type efflux pump in Staphylococcus aureus provides resistance to linoleic and arachidonic acids, J. Bacteriol., 197, 1893, 10.1128/JB.02607-14 · DOI
- Ding, 2023, Role of efflux pumps, their inhibitors, and regulators in colistin resistance, Front. Microbiol., 14, 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1207441 · DOI
- Nishino, 2021, Function and Inhibitory Mechanisms of Multidrug Efflux Pumps, Front. Microbiol., 12, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.737288 · DOI · Paper page
- Lekshmi, 2018, Modulation of antimicrobial efflux pumps of the major facilitator superfamily in Staphylococcus aureus, AIMS Microbiol., 4, 1, 10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.1 · DOI
- Floyd, 2010, LmrS is a multidrug efflux pump of the major facilitator superfamily from Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 54, 5406, 10.1128/AAC.00580-10 · DOI · Paper page
- Vimberg, 2020, VanZ reduces the binding of lipoglycopeptide antibiotics to Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae Cells, Front. Microbiol., 11, 566, 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00566 · DOI
- Liu, 2019, Potential of marine natural products against drug-resistant bacterial infections, Lancet Infect. Dis., 19, e237, 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30711-4 · DOI
- Dash, 2021, Thanatin: an emerging host defense antimicrobial peptide with multiple modes of action, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22, 10.3390/ijms22041522 · DOI
- Piller, 2022, Membrane Activity of LL-37 derived antimicrobial peptides against Enterococcus hirae: superiority of SAAP-148 over OP-145, Biomolecules, 12, 10.3390/biom12040523 · DOI
- Le, 2022, Efficiency of antimicrobial peptides against multidrug-resistant staphylococcal pathogens, Front. Microbiol., 13, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.930629 · DOI
- Gajdács, 2019, The continuing threat of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Antibiot. (Basel), 8
- Tripathy, 2019, FtsZ inhibitors as a new genera of antibacterial agents, Bioorg. Chem., 91, 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103169 · DOI
- Bibens, 2023, A review of fatty acid biosynthesis enzyme inhibitors as promising antimicrobial drugs, Pharm. (Basel), 16
- Naclerio, 2019, Antibacterial small molecules that potently inhibit staphylococcus aureus lipoteichoic acid biosynthesis, ChemMedChem, 14, 1000, 10.1002/cmdc.201900053 · DOI
- Hurtová, 2024, Nitrogen-containing flavonoids─preparation and biological activity, ACS Omega, 9, 34938, 10.1021/acsomega.4c04627 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c04627
- Magaña, 2023, Restoring susceptibility to aminoglycosides: identifying small molecule inhibitors of enzymatic inactivation, RSC Med. Chem., 14, 1591, 10.1039/D3MD00226H · doi:10.1039/d3md00226h
- Douglas, 2023, Novel antimicrobial strategies to treat multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, Microb. Biotechnol., 16, 1456, 10.1111/1751-7915.14268 · DOI
- Chand, 2023, Staphylococcus aureus vaccine strategy: promise and challenges, Microbiol. Res., 271, 10.1016/j.micres.2023.127362 · DOI
- Peck, 2019, A Phase 1, Randomized, Single-Ascending-Dose Study To Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of DSTA4637S, an Anti-Staphylococcus aureus Thiomab Antibody-Antibiotic Conjugate, in Healthy Volunteers, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 63, 10.1128/AAC.02588-18 · DOI
- Atshan, 2023, Phage therapy as an alternative treatment modality for resistant staphylococcus aureus infections, Antibiot. (Basel), 12
- Liu, 2024, Bacteriophage therapy for drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 14
- Liu, 2024, Staphylococcus aureus Infections and Human Intestinal Microbiota, Pathogens, 13, 10.3390/pathogens13040276 · DOI · Paper page
- Walvekar, 2019, Self-assembled oleylamine grafted hyaluronic acid polymersomes for delivery of vancomycin against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 182, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110388 · DOI
- Thamilselvan, 2023, Polymer based dual drug delivery system for targeted treatment of fluoroquinolone resistant Staphylococcus aureus mediated infections, Sci. Rep., 13, 10.1038/s41598-023-38473-3 · DOI
- Joshi, 2023, Metal nanoparticles as inhibitors of enzymes and toxins of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Infect. Med., 2, 294, 10.1016/j.imj.2023.11.006 · DOI
- Rani, 2022, Surface-engineered liposomes for dual-drug delivery targeting strategy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Asian J. Pharm. Sci., 17, 102, 10.1016/j.ajps.2021.11.004 · DOI
200 of 204 shown
Cited by
Staphylococcus aureus: A Review of the Pathogenesis and Virulence Mechanisms
Touaitia, R., Mairi, A., Ibrahim, N. A., Basher, N. S., Idres, T., & Touati, A. (2025) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics14050470 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Brdová, D., Ruml, T., & Viktorová, J.
- Venue
- Drug Resistance Updates
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-11
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 101147
- ISSN
- 1368-7646
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism of staphylococcal resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.drup.2024.101147
- The paper
- Brdová, D., Ruml, T., & Viktorová, J. (2024). Mechanism of staphylococcal resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics. Drug Resistance Updates. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2024.101147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.