The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil Health and Arthropods: From Complex System to Worthwhile Investigation
Open accessAbstract
The dramatic increase in soil degradation in the last few decades has led to the need to identify methods to define not only soil quality but also, in a holistic approach, soil health. In the past twenty years, indices based on living communities have been proposed alongside the already proven physical-chemical methods. Among them, some soil invertebrates have been included in monitoring programs as bioindicators of soil quality. Being an important portion of soil fauna, soil arthropods are involved in many soil processes such as organic matter decomposition and translocation, nutrient cycling, microflora activity regulation and bioturbation. Many studies have reported the use of soil arthropods to define soil quality; among taxa, some have been explored more in depth, typically Acari and Collembola, while generally less abundant groups, such as Palpigradi or Embioptera, have not been investigated much. This paper aims to evaluate and compare the use of different soil microarthropod taxa in soil degradation/quality studies to highlight which groups are the most reported for soil monitoring and which are the most sensitive to soil degradation. We have decided not to include the two most present and abundant taxa, Acari and Collembola, in this paper in consideration of the vast amount of existing literature and focus the discussion on the other microarthropod groups. We reported some studies for each taxon highlighting the use of the group as soil quality indicator. A brief section reporting some indices based on soil microarthropods is proposed at the end of this specific discussion. This paper can be considered as a reference point in the use of soil arthropods to estimate soil quality and health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference
Cáceres, M. D., & Legendre, P. (2009) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/08-1823.1 · Cited by 4,002
Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles
Nichols, E., Spector, S., Louzada, J., Larsen, T., Amezquita, S., & Favila, M. E. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.011 · Cited by 1,357
Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: a review
Folgarait, P. J. (1998) · Biodiversity & Conservation · doi:10.1023/a:1008891901953 · Cited by 1,089
Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators
Rainio, J., & Niemelä, J. (2003) · Biodiversity & Conservation · doi:10.1023/a:1022412617568 · Cited by 922
Tactics, Strategies and Templets
Southwood, T. R. E. (1988) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3565974 · Cited by 905
Faunal Activities and Soil Processes: Adaptive Strategies That Determine Ecosystem Function
Lavelle, P. (1997) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60007-0 · Cited by 726
Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in soil
Brussaard, L., Behan-Pelletier, V. M., Bignell, D. E., BROWN, V. K., Didden, W. A. M., Folgarait, P. J., Fragoso, C., Freckman, D. W., Gupta, V. V. S. R., Hattori, T., et al. (1997) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 616
Spiders (Araneae) useful for pest limitation and bioindication
Marc, P., Canard, A., & Ysnel, F. (1999) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00038-9 · Cited by 519
Terrestrial invertebrates as bioindicators: an overview of available taxonomic groups
Gerlach, J., Samways, M., & Pryke, J. (2013) · Journal of Insect Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10841-013-9565-9 · Cited by 515
Pearce, J., & Venier, L. (2006) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.03.005 · Cited by 473
Cited by
Lončarić, Ž., Bjedov, D., Kovačić, L. S., Ečimović, S., Hollert, H., & Velki, M. (2026) · Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.etap.2026.105097
Metadata
- Authors
- Menta, C., & Remelli, S.
- Venue
- Insects
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-01-16
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54
- ISSN
- 2075-4450 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2999306274
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 23.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil Health and Arthropods: From Complex System to Worthwhile Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/insects11010054
- The paper
- Menta, C., & Remelli, S. (2020). Soil Health and Arthropods: From Complex System to Worthwhile Investigation. Insects. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11010054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.