Cited by 20Hemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases

DeepThal: a deep learning-based framework for the large-scale prediction of the α+-thalassemia trait using red blood cell parameters

Open access
Phirom, Krittaya, Charoenkwan, Phasit, Shoombuatong, Watshara, Charoenkwan, Pimlak, Sirichotiyakul, Supatra, Tongsong, Theera·2022·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a machine learning (ML)-based framework using red blood cell (RBC) parameters for the prediction of the α+-thalassemia trait (α+-thal trait) and to compare the diagnostic performance with a conventional method using a single RBC parameter or a combination of RBC parameters. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on possible couples at risk for fetus with hemoglobin H (Hb H disease). Subjects with molecularly confirmed normal status (not thalassemia), α+-thal trait, and two-allele α-thalassemia mutation were included. Clinical parameters (age and gender) and RBC parameters (Hb, Hct, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW, and RBC count) obtained from their antenatal thalassemia screen were retrieved and analyzed using a machine learning (ML)-based framework and a conventional method. The performance of α+-thal trait prediction was evaluated. Results: In total, 594 cases (female/male: 330/264, mean age: 29.7 ± 6.6 years) were included in the analysis. There were 229 normal controls, 160 cases with the α+-thalassemia trait, and 205 cases in the two-allele α-thalassemia mutation category, respectively. The ML-derived model improved the diagnostic performance, giving a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 81%. The experimental results indicated that DeepThal achieved a better performance compared with other ML-based methods in terms of the independent test dataset, with an accuracy of 80.77%, sensitivity of 70.59%, and the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.608. Of all the red blood cell parameters, MCH < 28.95 pg as a single parameter had the highest performance in predicting the α+-thal trait with the AUC of 0.857 and 95% CI of 0.816–0.899. The combination model derived from the binary logistic regression analysis exhibited improved performance with the AUC of 0.868 and 95% CI of 0.830–0.906, giving a sensitivity of 80.1% and specificity of 75.1%. Conclusions: The performance of DeepThal in terms of the independent test dataset is sufficient to demonstrate that DeepThal is capable of accurately predicting the α+-thal trait. It is anticipated that DeepThal will be a useful tool for the scientific community in the large-scale prediction of the α+-thal trait.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm11216305

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of existing rule-based formulas and ML models are tailored to specific subcategories or subgoals, such as identifying one specific thalassemia or distinguishing these from IDA.

    “The majority of these rule-based formulas and ML models are tailored to specific subcategories or subgoals, such as identifying one specific thalassemia (19,(23)(24)(25)(26) and distinguishing these from IDA (15,17,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phirom, K., Charoenkwan, P., Shoombuatong, W., Charoenkwan, P., Sirichotiyakul, S., & Tongsong, T.
Affiliations
  • Chiang Mai University (TH)
  • Mahidol University (TH)
Corresponding author
  • Sirichotiyakul, Supatra
  • Tongsong, Theera
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-10-26
Volume
11
Issue
21
Pages
6305
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307291891
Cited by
20
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Chiang Mai University Research Fund (CMU-2566, DPG6280003)
  • Thailand Research Fund (CMU-2566, DPG6280003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Keywords
alpha-thalassemia trait, hemoglobin H disease, red blood cell parameters, deep learning, prenatal diagnosis, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, hemoglobin Bart's hydrops fetalis, binary logistic regression, diagnostic accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review