Cited by 1Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionComputer Science and EngineeringCryptographic Implementations and Security

Chaotic Image Encryption by Intra-Channel Diffusion and Inter-Channel Confusion

Open access
Vargas Valencia, Javier Alberto, Arango, Carlos Alberto Marín, García, Jairo David, Guerra, Rafael Uribe, Gómez, Luis Fernando Duque·2026·Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy

Abstract

Most image encryption schemes exhibit one or more of the following limitations: keystream bias, high residual pixel correlation, pattern leakage, low sensitivity to key changes, or a security-efficiency trade-off. We present a robust image encryption framework based on a chaotic system that operates across the red, green, and blue color channels and mitigates all of the above vulnerabilities. The scheme consists of a novel integration of strong bidirectional modular diffusion, inter-channel confusion using a six-state permutation table, and Secure Hash Algorithm 256-based key derivation. Thus, we achieve the following: lossless reconstruction, near-ideal entropy, negligible adjacency correlation, high sensitivity to infinitesimal changes in both the plaintext and the secret key, a complete diffusion effect confirmed by standard differential metrics, and resilience against known- and chosen-plaintext attacks. Furthermore, the results comply with the National Institute of Standards and Technology randomness tests. These results are obtained with competitive encryption times (∼0.37 s for 512 × 512 images) without any code optimization. All of these features make the scheme promising for secure real-time visual data transmission, particularly in telemedicine and Internet of Things surveillance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcp6030101

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Vargas Valencia, J. A., Arango, C. A. M., García, J. D., Guerra, R. U., & Gómez, L. F. D.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Ciencias de la Computación, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Aplicadas, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (ITM), Calle 73 No. 76A-354, Medellín 054959, Colombia
  • Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
  • Ciencia 5D, Calle 46 No 81-38, Int 202, Medellín 050032, Colombia
  • University of Atacama (CL)
Venue
Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2026-06-08
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
101
ISSN
2624-800X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7163888365
Cited by
1
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Keywords
image encryption, chaotic systems, RGB color channels, pixel correlation, key sensitivity, known-plaintext attack resistance, chosen-plaintext attack resistance, telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review