A Review on the Processing of Aero-Turbine Blade Using 3D Print Techniques
Open accessAbstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) has proven to be the preferred process over traditional processes in a wide range of industries. This review article focused on the progressive development of aero-turbine blades from conventional manufacturing processes to the additive manufacturing process. AM is known as a 3D printing process involving rapid prototyping and a layer-by-layer construction process that can develop a turbine blade with a wide variety of options to modify the turbine blade design and reduce the cost and weight compared to the conventional production mode. This article describes various AM techniques suitable for manufacturing high-temperature turbine blades such as selective laser melting, selective laser sintering, electron beam melting, laser engineering net shaping, and electron beam free form fabrication. The associated parameters of AM such as particle size and shape, powder bed density, residual stresses, porosity, and roughness are discussed here.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The reuse of sintered powder in technologies such as SLS and the scalability of processes like BMD for industrial applications remain critical areas for improvement.
“Moreover, the reuse of sintered powder in technologies such as SLS and the scalability of processes like BMD for industrial applications remain critical areas for improvement [83,124].”
From Towards Sustainability in Hydraulic Machinery Manufacturing by 3D Printing (2024) · cites this paper as [124]
Section 4.1 describes how SLS sinters powder but does not discuss reusing sintered powder. A search for BMD and industrial scalability found no relevant passage; section 4.3 discusses recycling loose powder in EBM instead. The available passages therefore do not address either claimed area for improvement. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- Verde, C.; Sánchez-Parra, M. Monitorability Analysis for a Gas Turbine Using Structural Analysis. In Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety of Technical Processes 2006; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 675-680.
- Pattnaik, S.; Karunakar, D.B.; Jha, P.K. Developments in Investment Casting Process-A Review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2012, 212, 2332-2348. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Jiang, R.; Kleer, R.; Piller, F.T. Predicting the Future of Additive Manufacturing: A Delphi Study on Economic and Societal Implications of 3D Printing for 2030. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2017, 117, 84-97. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Richardson, J.J.; Cui, J.; Björnmalm, M.; Braunger, J.A.; Ejima, H.; Caruso, F. Innovation in Layer-by-Layer Assembly. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 14828-14867. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Magerramova, L.; Vasilyev, B.; Kinzburskiy, V. Novel Designs of Turbine Blades for Additive Manufacturing. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Seoul, Korea, 13-17 June 2016.
- GE Aviation Invests in Widespread Rollout of GE Additive Arcam EBM Technology to Support GE9X Blade Production. Available online: https://www.ge.com/additive/press-releases/ge-aviation-invests-widespread-rollout-ge-additive-arcam- ebm-technology-support-ge9x (accessed on 15 November 2021).
- Angel, N.M.; Basak, A. On the Fabrication of Metallic Single Crystal Turbine Blades with a Commentary on Repair via Additive Manufacturing. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2020, 4, 101. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lattime, S.; Steinetz, B. Turbine Engine Clearance Control Systems: Current Practices and Future Directions. In Proceedings of the 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Indianapolis, Indiana, 7-10 July 2002.
- Chatterjee, B.; Bhowmik, S. Chapter 9-Evolution of Material Selection in Commercial Aviation Industry-A Review. In Sustainable Engineering Products and Manufacturing Technologies; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 199-219. ISBN 978-0-12-816564-5. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mertens, A.I.; Delahaye, J.; Lecomte-Beckers, J. Fusion-Based Additive Manufacturing for Processing Aluminum Alloys: State-of- the-Art and Challenges. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2017, 19, 1700003. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Singh, K. Advanced Materials for Land Based Gas Turbines. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2014, 67, 601-615. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Langston, L.S. Powering Out of Trouble. Mech. Eng. 2013, 135, 36-41. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wang, T. 15-The Gas and Steam Turbines and Combined Cycle in IGCC Systems. In Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 497-640. ISBN 978-0-08-100167-7. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Chyu, M.K.; Siw, S.C. Recent Advances of Internal Cooling Techniques for Gas Turbine Airfoils. J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl. 2013, 5, 2-12. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Koff, B.L. Gas Turbine Technology Evolution: A Designers Perspective. J. Propuls. Power 2004, 20, 577-595. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Dai, S.; Xiao, Y.; He, L.; Jin, T.; Hou, P.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, Z. Computational Study of Plasma Actuator on Film Cooling Performance for Different Shaped Holes. AIP Adv. 2015, 5, 67104. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hamed, A.A.; Tabakoff, W.; Rivir, R.B.; Das, K.; Arora, P. Turbine Blade Surface Deterioration by Erosion. J. Turbomach. 2004, 127, 445-452. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ruffles, P.C. Aero Engines of the Future. Aeronaut. J. 2003, 107, 307-321. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wei, Z.; Qiao, W.; Shi, P.; Chen, P.; Zhao, L. Tip-Leakage Flow Loss Reduction in a Two-Stage Turbine Using Axisymmetric-Casing Contouring. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2014, 27, 1111-1121. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Pal, A.; Bertoldi, K.; Pham, M.Q.; Schaenzer, M.; Gross, A.J. Optimal Turbine Blade Design Enabled by Auxetic Honeycomb. Smart Mater. Struct. 2020, 29, 125004. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Garg, S. Aircraft Turbine Engine Control Research at NASA Glenn Research Center. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2013, 26, 422-438. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Xue, S.; Ng, W.F. Turbine Blade Tip External Cooling Technologies. Aerospace 2018, 5, 90. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Schubel, P.J.; Crossley, R.J. Wind Turbine Blade Design. Energies 2012, 5, 3425-3449. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kruth, J.P.; Wang, X.; Laoui, T.; Froyen, L. Lasers and Materials in Selective Laser Sintering. Assem. Autom. 2003, 23, 357-371. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Yap, C.Y.; Chua, C.K.; Dong, Z.L.; Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, D.Q.; Loh, L.E.; Sing, S.L. Review of Selective Laser Melting: Materials and Applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2015, 2, 041101. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Additive Manufacturing: Siemens Uses Innovative Technology to Produce Gas Turbines. Available online: https://press.siemens. com/global/en/feature/additive-manufacturing-siemens-uses-innovative-technology-produce-gas-turbines (accessed on 15 November 2021).
- Galati, M.; Iuliano, L. A Literature Review of Powder-Based Electron Beam Melting Focusing on Numerical Simulations. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 19, 1-20. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Rafi, H.K.; Karthik, N.V.; Gong, H.; Starr, T.L.; Stucker, B.E. Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Ti6Al4V Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2013, 22, 3872-3883. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Yadav, P.; Fu, Z.; Knorr, M.; Travitzky, N. Binder Jetting 3D Printing of Titanium Aluminides Based Materials: A Feasibility Study. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2020, 22, 2000408. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mostafaei, A.; Stevens, E.L.; Hughes, E.T.; Biery, S.D.; Hilla, C.; Chmielus, M. Powder Bed Binder Jet Printed Alloy 625: Densification, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties. Mater. Des. 2016, 108, 126-135. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Popov, V.V.; Grilli, M.L.; Koptyug, A.; Jaworska, L.; Katz-Demyanetz, A.; Klobčar, D.; Balos, S.; Postolnyi, B.O.; Goel, S. Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Using Critical Raw Materials: A Review. Materials 2021, 14, 909. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Fang, X.; Du, J.; Wei, Z.; He, P.; Bai, H.; Wang, X.; Lu, B. An Investigation on Effects of Process Parameters in Fused-Coating Based Metal Additive Manufacturing. J. Manuf. Process. 2017, 28, 383-389. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Eboo, G.M.; Blake, A.G. Laser Cladding of Gas Turbine Components. In Proceedings of the ASME 1986 International Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibit, Dusseldorf, Germany, 8-12 June 1986. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Alimardani, M.; Fallah, V.; Khajepour, A.; Toyserkani, E. The Effect of Localized Dynamic Surface Preheating in Laser Cladding of Stellite 1. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2010, 204, 3911-3919. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Izadi, M.; Farzaneh, A.; Mohammed, M.; Gibson, I.; Rolfe, B. A Review of Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS) Build and Process Parameters of Metallic Parts. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2020, 26, 1059-1078. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Vaezi, M.; Chianrabutra, S.; Mellor, B.; Yang, S. Multiple Material Additive Manufacturing-Part 1: A Review. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2013, 8, 19-50. [CrossRef] 100. Albuquerque Optomec Customers Surpass 10 Million Turbine Blade Repairs. Available online: https://optomec.com/optomec- customers-surpass-10-million-turbine-blade-repairs/ (accessed on 15 November 2021). 101. Carlota, V. Optomec Customers Have Repaired More than 10 Million Turbine Blades-Optomec. Available online: https://www. 3dnatives.com/en/optomec-customer-surpass-10-million-turbine-blade-repairs-260820204/#! (accessed on 15 November 2021). 102. Majumdar, T.; Eisenstein, N.; Frith, J.E.; Cox, S.C.; Birbilis, N. Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Alloys for Orthopedic Applications: A Materials Science Viewpoint. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018, 20, 1800172. [CrossRef] 103. William, J.; Seufzer Robert, A. Hafley Height Control and Deposition Measurement for the Electron Beam Free Form Fabrication (EBF3) Process. Patent 9764415, 19 September 2017. 104. Electron-Beam Freeform Fabrication (EBF3): Technology and Application. Available online: https://3d-expo.ru/en/article/ proizvodstvo-elektronno-luchevoy-plavkoy-ebf-tehnologiya-i-primenenie-80098 (accessed on 15 November 2021). 105. AMFG Application Spotlight: 3D Printing for Turbine Parts. Available online: https://amfg.ai/2020/02/06/application- spotlight-3d-printing-for-turbine-parts/ (accessed on 15 November 2021). 106. Reitberger, T.; Hoerber, J.; Schramm, R.; Sennefelder, S.; Franke, J. Aerosol Jet ® Printing of Optical Waveguides. In Proceedings of the 2015 38th International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology (ISSE), Eger, Hungary, 6-10 May 2015. [CrossRef] 107. Garboczi, E.J.; Hrabe, N. Particle Shape and Size Analysis for Metal Powders Used for Additive Manufacturing: Technique Description and Application to Two Gas-Atomized and Plasma-Atomized Ti64 Powders. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 31, 100965. [CrossRef] 108. Strondl, A.; Lyckfeldt, O.; Brodin, H.; Ackelid, U. Characterization and Control of Powder Properties for Additive Manufacturing. JOM 2015, 67, 549-554. [CrossRef] 109. Bai, Y.; Wagner, G.; Williams, C.B. Effect of Particle Size Distribution on Powder Packing and Sintering in Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing of Metals. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017, 139, 081019. [CrossRef] 110. · DOI
- Brika, S.E.; Letenneur, M.; Dion, C.A.; Brailovski, V. Influence of Particle Morphology and Size Distribution on the Powder Flowability and Laser Powder Bed Fusion Manufacturability of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 31, 1-37. [CrossRef] 111. Kiani, P.; Scipioni Bertoli, U.; Dupuy, A.D.; Ma, K.; Schoenung, J.M. A Statistical Analysis of Powder Flowability in Metal Additive Manufacturing. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2020, 22, 2000022. [CrossRef] 112. Ali, U.; Mahmoodkhani, Y.; Imani Shahabad, S.; Esmaeilizadeh, R.; Liravi, F.; Sheydaeian, E.; Huang, K.Y.; Marzbanrad, E.; Vlasea, M.; Toyserkani, E. On the Measurement of Relative Powder-Bed Compaction Density in Powder-Bed Additive Manufacturing Processes. Mater. Des. 2018, 155, 495-501. [CrossRef] 113. Nguyen, Q.B.; Nai, M.L.S.; Zhu, Z.; Sun, C.-N.; Wei, J.; Zhou, W. Characteristics of Inconel Powders for Powder-Bed Additive Manufacturing. Engineering 2017, 3, 695-700. [CrossRef] 114. Spierings, A.B.; Schneider, M.; Eggenberger, R. Comparison of Density Measurement Techniques for Additive Manufactured Metallic Parts. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2011, 17, 380-386. [CrossRef] 115. Kamath, C.; El-dasher, B.; Gallegos, G.F.; King, W.E.; Sisto, A. Density of Additively-Manufactured, 316L SS Parts Using Laser Powder-Bed Fusion at Powers up to 400 W. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 74, 65-78. [CrossRef] 116. Vickers, N.J. Animal Communication: When I'm Calling You, Will You Answer Too? Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R713-R715. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 117. Micromeritics AccuPyc II. Available online: https://www.micromeritics.com/accupyc-ii/ (accessed on 15 November 2021). 118. Micromeritics GeoPyc 1365. Available online: https://www.micromeritics.com/micromeritics-geopyc-1365-envelope-density- analyzer/ (accessed on 15 November 2021). 119. Mussatto, A.; Groarke, R.; O'Neill, A.; Obeidi, M.A.; Delaure, Y.; Brabazon, D. Influences of Powder Morphology and Spreading Parameters on the Powder Bed Topography Uniformity in Powder Bed Fusion Metal Additive Manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 38, 101807. [CrossRef] 120. Maamoun, A.H.; Xue, Y.F.; Elbestawi, M.A.; Veldhuis, S.C. Effect of Selective Laser Melting Process Parameters on the Quality of Al Alloy Parts: Powder Characterization, Density, Surface Roughness, and Dimensional Accuracy. Materials 2018, 11, 12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 121. Khairallah, S.A.; Anderson, A.T.; Rubenchik, A.; King, W.E. Laser Powder-Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: Physics of Complex Melt Flow and Formation Mechanisms of Pores, Spatter, and Denudation Zones. Acta Mater. 2016, 108, 36-45. [CrossRef] 122. Li, C.; Liu, Z.Y.; Fang, X.Y.; Guo, Y.B. Residual Stress in Metal Additive Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 2018, 71, 348-353. [CrossRef] 123. Megahed, M.; Mindt, H.-W.; N'Dri, N.; Duan, H.; Desmaison, O. Metal Additive-Manufacturing Process and Residual Stress Modeling. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 2016, 5, 61-93. [CrossRef] 124. · DOI
- Genzel, C.; Denks, I.A.; Gibmeier, J.; Klaus, M.; Wagener, G. The Materials Science Synchrotron Beamline EDDI for Energy- Dispersive Diffraction Analysis. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2007, 578, 23-33. [CrossRef] 125. Mishurova, T.; Artzt, K.; Haubrich, J.; Requena, G.; Bruno, G. Exploring the Correlation between Subsurface Residual Stresses and Manufacturing Parameters in Laser Powder Bed Fused Ti-6Al-4V. Metals 2019, 9, 261. [CrossRef] 126. Nadammal, N.; Mishurova, T.; Fritsch, T.; Serrano-Munoz, I.; Kromm, A.; Haberland, C.; Portella, P.D.; Bruno, G. Critical Role of Scan Strategies on the Development of Microstructure, Texture, and Residual Stresses during Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 38, 1-33. [CrossRef] 127. Mukherjee, T.; Zhang, W.; DebRoy, T. An Improved Prediction of Residual Stresses and Distortion in Additive Manufacturing. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2017, 126, 360-372. [CrossRef] 128. · DOI
- Szost, B.A.; Terzi, S.; Martina, F.; Boisselier, D.; Prytuliak, A.; Pirling, T.; Hofmann, M.; Jarvis, D.J. A Comparative Study of Additive Manufacturing Techniques: Residual Stress and Microstructural Analysis of CLAD and WAAM Printed Ti-6Al-4V Components. Mater. Des. 2016, 89, 559-567. [CrossRef] 129. · DOI
- Vastola, G.; Zhang, G.; Pei, Q.X.; Zhang, Y.-W. Controlling of Residual Stress in Additive Manufacturing of Ti6Al4V by Finite Element Modeling. Addit. Manuf. 2016, 12, 231-239. [CrossRef] 130. · DOI
- DePond, P.J.; Guss, G.; Ly, S.; Calta, N.P.; Deane, D.; Khairallah, S.; Matthews, M.J. In Situ Measurements of Layer Roughness during Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Using Low Coherence Scanning Interferometry. Mater. Des. 2018, 154, 347-359. [CrossRef] 131. Tapia, G.; Elwany, A.H.; Sang, H. Prediction of Porosity in Metal-Based Additive Manufacturing Using Spatial Gaussian Process Models. Addit. Manuf. 2016, 12, 282-290. [CrossRef] 132. Baturynska, I. Statistical Analysis of Dimensional Accuracy in Additive Manufacturing Considering STL Model Properties. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 97, 2835-2849. [CrossRef] 133. Huang, S.H.; Liu, P.; Mokasdar, A.; Hou, L. Additive Manufacturing and Its Societal Impact: A Literature Review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 67, 1191-1203. [CrossRef] 134. Delgado, J.; Ciurana, J.; Rodríguez, C.A. Influence of Process Parameters on Part Quality and Mechanical Properties for DMLS and SLM with Iron-Based Materials. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2012, 60, 601-610. [CrossRef] 135. Jamshidinia, M.; Kovacevic, R. The Influence of Heat Accumulation on the Surface Roughness in Powder-Bed Additive Manufac- turing. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 2015, 3, 014003. [CrossRef] 136. Li, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, J.; Wu, D. Prediction of Surface Roughness in Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing with Machine Learning. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2019, 57, 488-495. [CrossRef] 137. Hirsch, M.; Patel, R.; Li, W.; Guan, G.; Leach, R.K.; Sharples, S.D.; Clare, A.T. Assessing the Capability of In-Situ Nondestructive Analysis during Layer Based Additive Manufacture. Addit. Manuf. 2017, 13, 135-142. [CrossRef] 138. Popov, D.; Maltsev, E.; Fryazinov, O.; Pasko, A.; Akhatov, I. Efficient Contouring of Functionally Represented Objects for Additive Manufacturing. Comput. Des. 2020, 129, 102917. [CrossRef] 139. Huckstepp, A. Surface Roughness-A Guide to Metal Additive Manufacturing by Digital Alloys. Available online: https://manufactur3dmag.com/surface-roughness-a-guide-to-metal-additive-manufacturing-by-digital-alloys/ (accessed on 15 November 2021). 140. · DOI
- Bourell, D.; Kruth, J.P.; Leu, M.; Levy, G.; Rosen, D.; Beese, A.M.; Clare, A. Materials for Additive Manufacturing. CIRP Ann. 2017, 66, 659-681. [CrossRef] 141. Chowdhury, S.; Mhapsekar, K.; Anand, S. Part Build Orientation Optimization and Neural Network-Based Geometry Compensa- tion for Additive Manufacturing Process. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017, 140, 031009. [CrossRef] 142. Higueros, E.; Roe, E.; Granell, E.; Baselga, E. Sturge-Weber Syndrome: A Review. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2017, 108, 407-417. [CrossRef] 143. DebRoy, T.; Wei, H.L.; Zuback, J.S.; Mukherjee, T.; Elmer, J.W.; Milewski, J.O.; Beese, A.M.; Wilson-Heid, A.; De, A.; Zhang, W. Additive Manufacturing of Metallic Components-Process, Structure and Properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 92, 112-224. [CrossRef] 144. Mukherjee, T.; Wei, H.L.; De, A.; DebRoy, T. Heat and Fluid Flow in Additive Manufacturing-Part II: Powder Bed Fusion of Stainless Steel, and Titanium, Nickel and Aluminum Base Alloys. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018, 150, 369-380. [CrossRef] 145. · DOI
- Knapp, G.L.; Mukherjee, T.; Zuback, J.S.; Wei, H.L.; Palmer, T.A.; De, A.; DebRoy, T. Building Blocks for a Digital Twin of Additive Manufacturing. Acta Mater. 2017, 135, 390-399. [CrossRef] 146. Yin, S.; Cavaliere, P.; Aldwell, B.; Jenkins, R.; Liao, H.; Li, W.; Lupoi, R. Cold Spray Additive Manufacturing and Repair: Fundamentals and Applications. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 21, 628-650. [CrossRef] 147. Jiang, Z.; Tao, W.; Yu, K.; Tan, C.; Chen, Y.; Li, L.; Li, Z. Comparative Study on Fiber Laser Welding of GH3535 Superalloy in Continuous and Pulsed Waves. Mater. Des. 2016, 110, 728-739. [CrossRef] 148. Lalehpour, A.; Barari, A. A More Accurate Analytical Formulation of Surface Roughness in Layer-Based Additive Manufacturing to Enhance the Product's Precision. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 96, 3793-3804. [CrossRef] 149. Yampolskiy, M.; King, W.E.; Gatlin, J.; Belikovetsky, S.; Brown, A.; Skjellum, A.; Elovici, Y. Security of Additive Manufacturing: Attack Taxonomy and Survey. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 21, 431-457. [CrossRef] 150. Gao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Ramanujan, D.; Ramani, K.; Chen, Y.; Williams, C.B.; Wang, C.C.L.; Shin, Y.C.; Zhang, S.; Zavattieri, P.D. The Status, Challenges, and Future of Additive Manufacturing in Engineering. Comput. Des. 2015, 69, 65-89. [CrossRef] 151 · DOI
- Mahmood, M.A.; Visan, A.I.; Ristoscu, C.; Mihailescu, I.N. Artificial Neural Network Algorithms for 3D Printing. Materials 2021, 14, 163. [CrossRef] 152. Leung, C.L.A.; Marussi, S.; Atwood, R.C.; Towrie, M.; Withers, P.J.; Lee, P.D. In Situ X-Ray Imaging of Defect and Molten Pool Dynamics in Laser Additive Manufacturing. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1-9. [CrossRef] 153. Lee, Y.S.; Kirka, M.M.; Ferguson, J.; Paquit, V.C. Correlations of Cracking with Scan Strategy and Build Geometry in Electron Beam Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 32, 101031. [CrossRef] 154. Attallah, M.M.; Jennings, R.; Wang, X.; Carter, L.N. Additive Manufacturing of Ni-Based Superalloys: The Outstanding Issues. MRS Bull. 2016, 41, 758-764. [CrossRef] 155. Herzog, D.; Seyda, V.; Wycisk, E.; Emmelmann, C. Additive Manufacturing of Metals. Acta Mater. 2016, 117, 371-392. [CrossRef] 156. Brandl, E. Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Additive Manufactured Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) Using Wire: Evaluation with Respect to Additive Processes Using Powder and Aerospace Material Specifications; Shaker Verlag GmbH: Aachen, Germany, 2011. 157. · DOI
- Carlton, H.D.; Haboub, A.; Gallegos, G.F.; Parkinson, D.Y.; MacDowell, A.A. Damage Evolution and Failure Mechanisms in Additively Manufactured Stainless Steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 651, 406-414. [CrossRef] 158. Wycisk, E.; Solbach, A.; Siddique, S.; Herzog, D.; Walther, F.; Emmelmann, C. Effects of Defects in Laser Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V on Fatigue Properties. Phys. Procedia 2014, 56, 371-378. [CrossRef] 159. Lütjering, G.; Williams, J.C. Commercially Pure (CP) Titanium and Alpha Alloys. In Titanium; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; pp. 149-175. 160. Zhang, H.; Zhou, J.; Muhammad, Y.; Tang, R.; Liu, K.; Zhu, Y.; Tong, Z. Citric Acid Modified Bentonite for Congo Red Adsorption. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 5. [CrossRef] 161. · DOI
- Leuders, S.; Thöne, M.; Riemer, A.; Niendorf, T.; Tröster, T.; Richard, H.A.; Maier, H.J. On the Mechanical Behaviour of Titanium Alloy TiAl6V4 Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting: Fatigue Resistance and Crack Growth Performance. Int. J. Fatigue 2013, 48, 300-307. [CrossRef] 162. · DOI
- Köhnen, P.; Létang, M.; Voshage, M.; Schleifenbaum, J.H.; Haase, C. Understanding the Process-Microstructure Correlations for Tailoring the Mechanical Properties of L-PBF Produced Austenitic Advanced High Strength Steel. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 30, 100914. [CrossRef] · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards Sustainability in Hydraulic Machinery Manufacturing by 3D Printing
Remache, A., Pérez-Sánchez, M., Hidalgo, V. H., Ramos, H. M., & Sánchez-Romero, F.-J. (2024) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr12122664 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sinha, A., Swain, B., Behera, A., Mallick, P., Samal, S. K., Vishwanatha, H. M., & Behera, A.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Technology Rourkela (IN)
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Behera, Asit
- Behera, Ajit
- Venue
- Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-01-21
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16
- ISSN
- 2504-4494 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205734190
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › High Temperature Alloys and Creep
- Keywords
- additive manufacturing, 3D printing, laser powder bed fusion, selective laser sintering, electron beam melting, powder bed density, residual stress, porosity, surface roughness, particle size and shape, weight loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review