Spontaneous Suppressors against Debilitating Transmembrane Mutants of CaMdr1 Disclose Novel Interdomain Communication via Signature Motifs of the Major Facilitator Superfamily
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) drug:H+ antiporter CaMdr1, from Candida albicans, is responsible for the efflux of structurally diverse antifungals. MFS members share a common fold of 12–14 transmembrane helices (TMHs) forming two N- and C-domains. Each domain is arranged in a pseudo-symmetric fold of two tandems of 3-TMHs that alternatively expose the drug-binding site towards the inside or the outside of the yeast to promote drug binding and release. MFS proteins show great diversity in primary structure and few conserved signature motifs, each thought to have a common function in the superfamily, although not yet clearly established. Here, we provide new information on these motifs by having screened a library of 64 drug transport-deficient mutants and their corresponding suppressors spontaneously addressing the deficiency. We found that five strains recovered the drug-resistance capacity by expressing CaMdr1 with a secondary mutation. The pairs of debilitating/rescuing residues are distributed either in the same TMH (T127ATMH1- > G140DTMH1) or 3-TMHs repeat (F216ATMH4- > G260ATMH5), at the hinge of 3-TMHs repeats tandems (R184ATMH3- > D235HTMH4, L480ATMH10- > A435TTMH9), and finally between the N- and C-domains (G230ATMH4- > P528HTMH12). Remarkably, most of these mutants belong to the different signature motifs, highlighting a mechanistic role and interplay thought to be conserved among MFS proteins. Results also point to the specific role of TMH11 in the interplay between the N- and C-domains in the inward- to outward-open conformational transition.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Glucose transporters in the 21st Century
Thorens, B., & Mueckler, M. (2010) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00712.2009 · Cited by 1,013 · see citing works
White, T. C. (1997) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.41.7.1482 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Resistance Mechanisms in Clinical Isolates of <i>Candida albicans</i>
White, T. C., Holleman, S., Dy, F., Mirels, L. F., & Stevens, D. A. (2002) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.46.6.1704-1713.2002 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
An embedded lipid in the multidrug transporter LmrP suggests a mechanism for polyspecificity
Debruycker, V., Hutchin, A., Masureel, M., Ficici, E., Martens, C., Legrand, P., Stein, R. A., Mchaourab, H. S., Faraldo-Gómez, J. D., Remaut, H., et al. (2020) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-020-0464-y · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Sharma, S., Banerjee, A., Moreno, A., Redhu, A. K., Falson, P., & Prasad, R.
- Affiliations
- Amity University (IN)
- Drug Resistance & Membrane Proteins Team, Molecular Microbiology and Structural Biochemistry Laboratory, Institut de Biologie et Chimie des Protéines, CNRS-Lyon 1 University Research lab n° 5086, 69367 Lyon, France
- Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Sharma, Suman
- Banerjee, Atanu
- Redhu, Archana Kumari
- Falson, Pierre
- Prasad, Rajendra
- Venue
- Journal of Fungi
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-05-22
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 538
- ISSN
- 2309-608X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9143388
- OpenAlex
- W4281261744
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Fungi (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (BT/PR32349/MED/29/1456/2019, BT/PR38505/MED/29/1513/2020, ANR-CLAMP2-18-CE11-0002-01)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Lyon University, the French Research Agency (ANR) (BT/PR32349/MED/29/1456/2019, BT/PR38505/MED/29/1513/2020, ANR-CLAMP2-18-CE11-0002-01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- major facilitator superfamily, Candida albicans, drug resistance, suppressor screen, signature motifs, conformational change, antifungal resistance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review