Cited by 112Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategies and InnovationBusiness Strategy and Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigating the Research Trends on Strategic Ambidexterity, Agility, and Open Innovation in SMEs: Perceptions from Bibliometric Analysis

Open access
Ragazou, Konstantina, Passas, Ioannis, Garefalakis, Alexandros, Dimou, Irini·2022·Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Abstract

The unprecedented conditions of restrictive measures that were suddenly imposed in 2020 due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic affected business activity globally.To deal with the consequences that were caused by the pandemic, most SMEs had to adopt strategies which will enhance their development and footprint in the business arena.With this study, we aim to propose a theoretical approach, via bibliometric analysis, of a new business model innovation that will be based on the triple-win formula of strategic agility, ambidexterity, and open innovation.Open innovation can help SMEs develop their ambidexterity and agility capacity and become more efficient, which can contribute to gaining competitive advantage.To approach this issue, a bibliometric analysis was conducted based on 606 articles that were published in the timespan of 2008-2021.The bibliometric analysis used various indicators such as the scientific production in the studied field, h-Index, co-occurrence collaboration, Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA), keyword analysis, and thematic mapping.Biblioshiny and VOSviewer were used to process the data, and contributed to the visualization of the results.Of the 476 sources that were analyzed, most of the articles were published by Journal of Business Research; British scholars are those with the highest number of citations on the topic.This research provides insights related to the state of the art of the study area under analysis and highlights the gaps, which contributed to the building of a new business model innovation that will integrate not only ambidexterity and strategic agility, but open innovation, too.The new business model can help SMEs quickly adapt in the new business environment created by the past successive series of crises, such as the most recent financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/joitmc8030118

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the context of MSMEs, innovation includes improvement of operational, marketing, and management processes that can generate efficiency and differentiation needed to survive in a dynamic market.

    “In the context of MSMEs, Innovationinnovation does not only refer to the creation of new products but also to the improvement of operational, marketing, and management processes that can generate the efficiency and differentiation needed to survive in a dynamic market”

    From Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Ragazou et al., 2022

    The Literature Review (section 2; page unavailable) links agile and open innovation strategies to more effective management and improved internal functions. The Discussion and Conclusions (sections 5–6; pages unavailable) propose business-model changes to improve SMEs’ competitiveness and continuity. The paper does not specifically characterize marketing-process improvements as innovation, and its discussion concerns SMEs rather than MSMEs as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Smart, 2021, COVID-19 impacts, coping strategies, and management reflection: A lodging industry case, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 94, 102859, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102859 · DOI
  2. Kapitsinis, 2018, The impact of economic crisis on firm relocation: Greek SME movement to Bulgaria and its effects on business performance, GeoJournal, 84, 321, 10.1007/s10708-018-9863-6 · DOI
  3. Ferreras-Méndez, 2022, Speeding up new product development through entrepreneurial orientation in SMEs: The moderating role of ambidexterity, Ind. Mark. Manag., 102, 240, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.015 · DOI
  4. Wenke, 2020, Too small to do it all? A meta-analysis on the relative relationships of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity with SME performance, J. Bus. Res., 132, 653, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.018 · DOI
  5. Chaudhuri, 2021, Circular economy and digital capabilities of SMEs for providing value to customers: Combined resource-based view and ambidexterity perspective, J. Bus. Res., 142, 32, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.039 · DOI
  6. Duncan, 1976, The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation, Manag. Organ., 1, 167
  7. March, 2009, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Studi Organ., 2, 71
  8. Nyamrunda, 2020, Strategic agility, dynamic relational capability and trust among SMEs in transitional economies, J. World Bus., 56, 101175, 10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101175 · DOI
  9. Patel, 2021, An agile manufacturing conceptual model of performance measure factors for SMEs in Gujarat, Mater. Today Proc., 47, 3029, 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.496 · DOI
  10. Jiang, 2022, Strategic conformity, organizational learning ambidexterity, and corporate innovation performance: An inverted U-shaped curve?, J. Bus. Res., 149, 424, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.023 · DOI
  11. Ardito, 2018, The influence of inbound open innovation on ambidexterity performance: Does it pay to source knowledge from supply chain stakeholders?, J. Bus. Res., 119, 321, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.043 · DOI
  12. Hossain, 2022, SMEs in COVID-19 Crisis and Combating Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and A Case from Emerging Economy, Oper. Res. Perspect., 9, 100222
  13. Farzaneh, 2022, Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation, J. Bus. Res., 148, 47, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030 · DOI
  14. Xie, 2020, Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Scientific Publications on Atlantoaxial Spine Surgery Based on Web of Science and VOSviewer, World Neurosurg., 137, 435, 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.171 · DOI
  15. Alghamdi, 2018, Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance, J. Innov. Entrep., 7, 1, 10.1186/s13731-018-0081-8 · DOI
  16. Ahmadi, 2020, Integrated exploratory factor analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis to evaluate balanced ambidexterity fostering innovation in manufacturing SMEs, Asia Pac. Manag. Rev., 25, 142
  17. De la Lastra, 2022, Developing the ambidextrous organization. The role of intellectual capital in building ambidexterity: An exploratory study in the haute cuisine sector, J. Hosp. Tour. Manag., 51, 321, 10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.04.002 · DOI
  18. Úbeda-García, 2019, Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: Exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations, J. Bus. Res., 112, 363, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.051 · DOI
  19. Katou, 2020, A trilogy of organizational ambidexterity: Leader’s social intelligence, employee work engagement and environmental changes, J. Bus. Res., 128, 688, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.043 · DOI
  20. Khan, 2022, Strategic ambidexterity and its performance implications for emerging economies multinationals, Int. Bus. Rev., 31, 101762, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101762 · DOI
  21. Saputra, 2022, Strategic role of digital capability on business agility during COVID-19 era, Procedia Comput. Sci., 197, 326, 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.147 · DOI
  22. Bolislis, 2021, Regulatory Agilities in the Time of COVID-19: Overview, Trends, and Opportunities, Clin. Ther., 43, 124, 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.11.015 · DOI
  23. Lamprinopoulou, 2014, Application of an integrated systemic framework for analysing agricultural innovation systems and informing innovation policies: Comparing the Dutch and Scottish agrifood sectors, Agric. Syst., 129, 40, 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.001 · DOI
  24. Riccaboni, 2021, Sustainability-oriented research and innovation in ‘farm to fork’ value chains, Curr. Opin. Food Sci., 42, 102, 10.1016/j.cofs.2021.04.006 · DOI
  25. Korytkowski, 2017, Competences-based performance model of multi-skilled workers with learning and forgetting, Expert Syst. Appl., 77, 226, 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.004 · DOI
  26. Niknejad, 2020, Mapping the research trends on blockchain technology in food and agriculture industry: A bibliometric analysis, Environ. Technol. Innov., 21, 101272, 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101272 · DOI
  27. Zhou, 2018, Understanding employee competence, operational IS alignment, and organizational agility—An ambidexterity perspective, Inf. Manag., 55, 695, 10.1016/j.im.2018.02.002 · DOI
  28. Ellegaard, 2015, The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?, Scientometrics, 105, 1809, 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z · DOI
  29. Faruk, 2021, How digital marketing evolved over time: A bibliometric analysis on scopus database, Heliyon, 7, e08603, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08603 · DOI
  30. Kamaruzzaman, 2021, 25 years of progress on plants as corrosion inhibitors through a bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database (1995–2020), Arab. J. Chem., 15, 103655, 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103655 · DOI
  31. Brown, 2019, Prosumers in the post subsidy era: An exploration of new prosumer business models in the UK, Energy Policy, 135, 110984, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110984 · DOI
  32. Ndubuka, 2019, Capability approach for realising the Sustainable Development Goals through Responsible Management Education: The case of UK business school academics, Int. J. Manag. Educ., 17, 100319
  33. Rigby, 2016, Embracing Agile: How to Master the Process That’s Transforming Management, Harv. Bus. Rev., 94, 40
  34. Scholten, 2015, Bridging ties and the role of research and start-up experience on the early growth of Dutch academic spin-offs, Technovation, 45, 40, 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.05.001 · DOI
  35. Snihur, 2022, A call for action: The impact of business model innovation on business ecosystems, society and planet, Long Range Plan., 102182, 10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102182 · DOI
  36. Al Jafa, 2021, The Role of Agile Management in HRM Environment Change, J. Agric. Informatics, 12, 37
  37. Tamala, 2022, A bibliometric analysis of sustainable oil and gas production research using VOSviewer, Clean. Eng. Technol., 7, 100437, 10.1016/j.clet.2022.100437 · DOI
  38. Mühl, 2022, A bibliometric and thematic approach to agriculture 4.0, Heliyon, 8, e09369, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09369 · DOI
  39. Fomina, 2022, Community supported agriculture: Setting the research agenda through a bibliometric analysis, J. Rural Stud., 92, 294, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.04.007 · DOI
  40. Hadjielias, 2021, Digitalization, agility, and customer value in tourism, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 175, 121334, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121334 · DOI
  41. Ben Rejeb, 2022, From Innovation to Eco-Innovation: Co-Created Training Materials as a Change Driver for Research and Technology Organisations, Procedia CIRP, 105, 98, 10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.017 · DOI
  42. Ch’Ng, 2020, Eco-innovation practices and sustainable business performance: The moderating effect of market turbulence in the Malaysian technology industry, J. Clean. Prod., 283, 124556, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124556 · DOI
  43. Schmidt, 2008, The Sankey Diagram in Energy and Material Flow Management, J. Ind. Ecol., 12, 173, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00015.x · DOI
  44. Soeteman-Hernandez, 2019, Safe innovation approach: Towards an agile system for dealing with innovations, Mater. Today Commun., 20, 100548, 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100548 · DOI
  45. Li, 2020, How should we understand the digital economy in Asia? Critical assessment and research agenda, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., 44, 101004, 10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101004 · DOI
  46. Du, 2021, Sustainability-focused innovation in the business-to-business context: Antecedents and managerial implications, J. Bus. Res., 138, 117, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.006 · DOI
  47. Yi, 2020, Business model innovations in China: A focus on value propositions, Bus. Horizons, 63, 787, 10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.002 · DOI
  48. Tosun, 2022, Effects of green transformational leadership on green performance of employees via the mediating role of corporate social responsibility: Reflection from North Cyprus, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 103, 103218, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103218 · DOI
  49. Trapp, 2021, Green entrepreneurship and business models: Deriving green technology business model archetypes, J. Clean. Prod., 297, 126694, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126694 · DOI
  50. Reim, 2022, Tackling business model challenges in SME internationalization through digitalization, J. Innov. Knowl., 7, 100199, 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100199 · DOI
  51. Codini, 2022, Business Model Innovation and exaptation: A new way of innovating in SMEs, Technovation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ragazou, K., Passas, I., Garefalakis, A., & Dimou, I.
Affiliations
Hellenic Mediterranean University (GR)
Corresponding author
Ragazou, Konstantina
Venue
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
118
ISSN
2199-8531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285033254
Cited by
112
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 4
FWCI
16.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
Keywords
strategic ambidexterity, strategic agility, open innovation, small and medium-sized enterprises, business model innovation, COVID-19 pandemic, competitive advantage, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review