CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 199European Union Policy and GovernanceCultural and political discourse analysisSustainable Development and Policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sustainability in the European Union: Analyzing the Discourse of the European Green Deal

Open access
Eckert, Eva, Kovalevska, Oleksandra·2021·Journal of Risk and Financial Management
DOI 10.3390/jrfm14020080
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In the European Union, the concern for sustainability has been legitimized by its politically and ecologically motivated discourse disseminated through recent policies of the European Commission and the local as well as international media. In the article, we question the very meaning of sustainability and examine the European Green Deal, the major political document issued by the EC in 2019. The main question pursued in the study is whether expectations verbalized in the Green Deal’s plans, programs, strategies, and developments hold up to the scrutiny of critical discourse analysis. We compare the Green Deal’s treatment of sustainability to how sustainability is presented in environmental and social science scholarship and point out that research, on the one hand, and the politically motivated discourse, on the other, do not correlate and often actually contradict each other. We conclude that sustainability discourse and its keywords, lexicon, and phraseology have become a channel through which political institutions in the EU such as the European Commission sideline crucial environmental issues and endorse their own presence. The Green Deal discourse shapes political and institutional power of the Commission and the EU.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jrfm14020080

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Drew, Paul, and Heritage, John (1991). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institution Settings et al. 2013. State of the World 2013: Is Sustainability Still Possible?, Island Press.
  2. Engelman, Robert (2013). State of the World 2013: Is Sustainability Still Possible?, Island Press.
  3. Kress, Gunther, and Hodge, Robert (1979). Language as Ideology, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  4. Nichols, Ryan (2007). Introducing the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, The University of British Columbia. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231608775_Linguistic_Inquiry_and_Word_Count_LIWC_pronounced_Luke_and_other_useful_facts.
  5. Slatin, 2019, The green new deal—A revolutionary concept. New solutions, Journal of Environment and Occupational Health Policy, 29, 133
  6. World Commision on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future, Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–199 of 199

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Eckert, E., & Kovalevska, O.
Affiliations
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • Metropolitan University Prague (CZ)
Corresponding author
  • Eckert, Eva
  • Kovalevska, Oleksandra
ORCID
Kovalevska, Oleksandra
Venue
Journal of Risk and Financial Management
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-02-17
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
80
ISSN
  • 1911-8066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1911-8074
DOI
10.3390/jrfm14020080
OpenAlex
W3132688225
Cited by
199
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 8
FWCI
88.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of risk and financial management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Metropolitan University Prague
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Policies
Keywords
sustainability discourse, European Green Deal, European Commission, political discourse, critical discourse analysis, environmental policy, institutional power, greenwashing, EU environmental policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review