Cited by 10Working Capital and Financial PerformanceSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementCorporate Finance and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Firm Performance of Saudi Manufacturers: Does the Management of Cash Conversion Cycle Components Matter?

Open access
Kouaib, Amel, Bu Haya, Mohammed Ibrahim·2024·Journal of Risk and Financial Management

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the liquidity management of a corporation. It aims to examine how managing cash conversion cycle components affects corporate performance. A dataset of 88 firms listed on the Saudi Stock Exchange between 2018 and 2022 was analyzed using both pooled OLS and fixed effects regression models. A sample of 84 firms listed on the Saudi Stock Exchange for the period from 2018 to 2022 was used. Both the pooled OLS and the fixed effects regression models were used. This study’s key findings are: (1) there is a strong negative correlation between the time it takes to convert inventory into sales (inventory conversion period) and firm performance. If inventory does not sell quickly, profit tends to be lower. (2) Firm performance demonstrates a strong inverse relationship with the duration it takes for companies to collect cash from customers, commonly known as the accounts receivable collection period. A short accounts receivable collection period may become collectible and increase a business’s profitability and performance. (3) There is a highly significant negative link between the time taken to pay creditors (days payable outstanding) and firm performance. A short average payment period, indicated by a low payment period, suggests that the firm is promptly settling its bills and obligations without any delays.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jrfm17010016

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 43 · Cited by 10

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Ali, 2022, Impact of inventory management on operating profits: Evidence from India, Journal of Finance and Economics, 10, 47
  2. Alves, 2011, The effect of the board structure on earnings management: Evidence from Portugal, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 9, 141, 10.1108/19852511111173103 · DOI
  3. Attari, 2012, The optimal relationship of cash conversion cycle with firm size and profitability, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2, 189
  4. Beiner, 2004, Is board size an independent corporate governance mechanism?, Kyklos, 57, 327, 10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00257.x · DOI
  5. Brigham, Eugene (1995). Fundamentals of Financial Management, The Dryden Press.
  6. Charitou, 2010, The effect of working capital management on firm profitability: Empirical evidence from an emerging market, Journal of Business & Economics Research, 8, 63
  7. Ebben, 2011, Cash conversion cycle management in small firms: Relationships with liquidity, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 24, 381, 10.1080/08276331.2011.10593545 · DOI
  8. Enqvista, 2014, The impact of working capital management on firm profitability in different business cycles: Evidence from Finland, Research in International Business and Finance, 32, 36, 10.1016/j.ribaf.2014.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fama, 1995, Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns, Journal of Finance, 50, 131
  10. Gill, 2010, The relationship between working capital management and profitability: Evidence from the United States, Business and Economics Journal, 10, 1
  11. Gitman, 1974, Estimating corporate liquidity requirements: A simplified approach, The Financial Review, 9, 79, 10.1111/j.1540-6288.1974.tb01453.x · DOI
  12. Gitman, Lawrence, Roger, Juchau, and Jack, Flanagan (2015). Principles of Managerial Finance, Pearson Education International.
  13. Gujarati, Damodar (2003). Basic Econometrics, McGraw Hill. [4th ed.].
  14. Hashed, 2022, The nexus between inventory management and firm performance: A Saudi Arabian perspective, Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 9, 297
  15. Jana, 2018, Impact of working capital management on profitability of the selected listed FMCG companies in India, International Research Journal of Business Studies, 11, 21, 10.21632/irjbs.11.1.21-30 · DOI
  16. Jordan, Randolph Westerfield (2003). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, McGraw-Hill Companies. [6th ed.].
  17. Jose, 1996, Corporate returns and cash conversion cycles, Journal of Economics and Finance, 20, 33, 10.1007/BF02920497 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Karim, 2018, Inventory management effectiveness of a manufacturing Company—Malaysian evidence, International Journal of Law and Management, 60, 1163, 10.1108/IJLMA-04-2017-0094 · DOI
  19. Karim, Rejaul, Mamun, Md Abdullah Al, and Kamruzzaman, Abu Sadeque Md. (Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 2023). Cash conversion cycle and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing firms of Bangladesh, Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, ahead-of-print. · DOI
  20. Keown, Arthur, Martin, John, Petty, William, and Scott, David (2003). Foundations of Finance: The Logic and Practice of Financial Management, Pearson Education. [4th ed.].
  21. Khan, 2015, The effect of selected financial ratios on profitability: An empirical analysis of listed firms of cement sector in Saudi Arabia, Quarterly Journal of Econometrics Research, 1, 1, 10.18488/journal.88/2015.1.1/88.1.1.12 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kim, 2005, Board network characteristics and firm performance in Korea, Corporate Governance An International Review, 13, 800, 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00471.x · DOI
  23. King, 2011, Lean and green? An Empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance, Production and Operations Management, 10, 244, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00373.x · DOI
  24. Lin, 2021, Cash conversion cycle and aggregate stock returns, Journal of Financial Markets, 52, 100560, 10.1016/j.finmar.2020.100560 · DOI
  25. Louw, 2022, The relationship between working capital management and profitability: Evidence from South African retail and construction firms, Global Business Review, 23, 313, 10.1177/0972150919865104 · DOI
  26. Mathuva, 2010, The Influence of Working Capital Management Components on Corporate Profitability: A Survey on Kenyan Listed Firms, Research Journal of Business Management, 4, 1, 10.3923/rjbm.2010.1.11 · DOI
  27. Mishra, Umakanta, Wu, Jei-Zheng, and Sarkar, Biswajit (2021). Optimum sustainable inventory management with backorder and deterioration under controllable carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279. · DOI
  28. Niresh, 2012, Working capital management & financial performance of manufacturing sector in Sri Lanka, European Journal of Business and Management, 4, 23
  29. Peel, 2000, Late payment and credit management in the small firm sector: Some empirical evidence, International Small Business Journal, 18, 17, 10.1177/0266242600182001 · DOI
  30. Raheman, 2007, Working capital management and profitability-case of Pakistani firms, International Review of Business Research Papers, 3, 279
  31. Rehman, 2014, Select financial ratios as a determinant of profitability evidence from petrochemical industry in Saudi Arabia, European Journal of Business and Management, 6, 187
  32. Richards, 1980, A cash conversion cycle approach to liquidity analysis, Financial Management, 9, 32, 10.2307/3665310 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Rodrigo, 2020, Effect of inventory management on financial performance of listed manufacturing companies in Sri Lanka, IAR Journal of Business Management, 1, 383
  34. Ross, Stephen, Westerfield, Randolph, and Jordan, Bradford (2003). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, The McGraw-Hill Companies. [6th ed.].
  35. Schonberger, 2007, Japanese production management: An evolution—With mixed success, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 403, 10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.003 · DOI
  36. Shah, 2007, Relationships among information technology, inventory, and profitability: An investigation of level invariance using sector level data, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 768, 10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.011 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Shaik, 2021a, COVID-19 pandemic and the reaction of Asian stock markets: Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia, Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8, 1
  38. Shaik, 2021b, Components of working capital and profitability in Saudi Arabian companies, Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18, 52, 10.21511/imfi.18(3).2021.05 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Vahid, 2012, Working capital management and corporate performance: Evidence from Iranian companies, Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1313, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.225 · DOI
  40. Vishnani, 2007, Impact of working capital management policies on corporate performance—An empirical study, Global Business Review, 8, 267, 10.1177/097215090700800206 · DOI
  41. Wang, 2002, Liquidity management, operating performance, and corporate value: Evidence from Japan and Taiwan, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 12, 159, 10.1016/S1042-444X(01)00047-0 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Wangari, 2015, Influence of inventory management practices on organizational competitiveness: A case of Safaricom Kenya LTD, International Academic Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, 1, 72
  43. White, 1999, JIT manufacturing survey of implementations in small and large U.S. manufacturers, Management Science, 45, 1, 10.1287/mnsc.45.1.1 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Kouaib, A., & Bu Haya, M. I.
Affiliations
  • King Faisal University (SA)
  • Accounting Department, School of Business, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
Corresponding author
Kouaib, Amel
Venue
Journal of Risk and Financial Management
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-01-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
16
ISSN
  • 1911-8066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1911-8074
OpenAlex
W4390523582
Cited by
10
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of risk and financial management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies (4713)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Working Capital and Financial Performance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Corporate Finance and Governance
Keywords
cash conversion cycle, firm performance, liquidity management, inventory conversion period, accounts receivable collection period, days payable outstanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review