Cited by 26Multi-Criteria Decision MakingSustainable Supply Chain ManagementMaterial Selection and Properties

Enhancing Supplier Selection for Sustainable Raw Materials: A Comprehensive Analysis Using Analytical Network Process (ANP) and TOPSIS Methods

Open access
Masudin, Ilyas, Habibah, Isna Zahrotul, Wardana, Rahmad Wisnu, Restuputri, Dian Palupi, Shariff, S. Sarifah Radiah·2024·Logistics

Abstract

Background: This research endeavors to enhance supplier selection processes by combining the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodologies, with a specific focus on sustainability criteria. Method: Initially comprising 21 sub-criteria derived from prior research, the selection criteria are refined to 17, eliminating redundant elements. The core principle guiding this refinement is the comprehensive coverage of economic, social, and environmental dimensions, essential for sustainable supplier evaluation. Results: The study’s outcomes underscore the paramount importance of economic criteria (0.0652) in supplier selection, followed by environmental (0.0343) and social dimensions (0.0503). Key sub-criteria contributing significantly to this evaluation encompassed consistent product quality, competitive raw material pricing, proficient labor capabilities, recycling potential, punctual delivery performance, and effective waste management practices. Conclusions: These sub-criteria are thoughtfully integrated into the sustainable assessment framework, aligning seamlessly with the economic, environmental, and social criteria.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/logistics8030074

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masudin, I., Habibah, I. Z., Wardana, R. W., Restuputri, D. P., & Shariff, S. S. R.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (ID)
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA System (MY)
Corresponding author
Masudin, Ilyas
Venue
Logistics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-07-18
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
74
ISSN
2305-6290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400772677
Cited by
26
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 2
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Logistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Material Selection and Properties
Keywords
supplier selection, sustainable raw materials, analytic network process, TOPSIS, multi-criteria decision making, raw material pricing, product quality, delivery performance, waste management, recycling potential

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review