The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Circular Economy on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Material Recovery and Production
Open accessAbstract
Construction and demolition waste (CDW) accounts for at least 30% of the total solid waste produced around the world. At around 924 million tons in the European Union in 2016 and 2.36 billion tons in China in 2018, the amount is expected to increase over the next few years. Dumping these wastes in sanitary landfills has always been the traditional approach to waste management but this will not be feasible in the years to come. To significantly reduce or eliminate the amount of CDW being dumped, circular economy is a possible solution to the increasing amounts of CDW. Circular economy is an economic system based on business models which replaces the end-of-life concept with reducing, reusing, recycling, and recovering materials. This paper discusses circular economy (CE) frameworks—specifically material recovery and production highlighting the reuse and recycling of CDW and reprocessing into new construction applications. Likewise, a literature review into recent studies of reuse and recycling of CDW and its feasibility is also discussed to possibly prove the effectivity of CE in reducing CDW. Findings such as effectivity of recycling CDW into new construction applications and its limitations in effective usage are discussed and research gaps such as reuse of construction materials are also undertaken. CE and recycling were also found to be emerging topics. Observed trends in published articles as well as the use of latent Dirichlet allocation in creating topic models have shown a rising awareness and increasing research in CE which focuses on recycling and reusing CDW.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Akhtar, A., & Sarmah, A. K. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.085 · Cited by 1,250
Iacovidou, E., & Purnell, P. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.098 · Cited by 200
Fraj, A. B., & Idir, R. (2017) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.059 · Cited by 144
Cited by
Morganti, L., Demutti, M., Fotoglou, I., Coscia, E. A., Perillo, P., & Pracucci, A. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13102630 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Ginga, C. P., Ongpeng, J. M. C., & Daly, M. K. M.
- Venue
- Materials
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-07-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2970
- ISSN
- 1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3039118772
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circular Economy on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Material Recovery and Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ma13132970
- The paper
- Ginga, C. P., Ongpeng, J. M. C., & Daly, M. K. M. (2020). Circular Economy on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Material Recovery and Production. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13132970
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.