Cited by 48Innovative concrete reinforcement materialsStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFire effects on concrete materials

Effects of Steel Fiber and Specimen Geometric Dimensions on the Mechanical Properties of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete

Open access
Fang, Haozhen, Gu, Mingen, Zhang, Shufeng, Jiang, Haibo, Fang, Zhuangcheng, Hu, Jiaxin·2022·Materials

Abstract

Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is an advanced concrete with superior mechanical strength, ductility and durability properties. However, the influence of steel fiber on its constitutive laws and the specimen geometric dimension effect on its strength had not been paid enough attention. To investigate the effect of steel fibers on the properties of UHPC, specimens with different fiber volume contents and fiber types were tested. Meanwhile, the mechanical properties of UHPC at different ages from 3 days to 28 days were conducted. Moreover, specimens with various geometric dimensions were also prepared to study the effect of specimen geometric dimensions (dog-bone-shaped, prism and cylinder specimens) on the properties of UHPC. The results indicated that elastic modulus, tensile peak stress and the corresponding strain increased as the fiber volume content and curing age increased. Specimens with hooked-end fibers exhibited better tensile performance than those with straight fibers. Furthermore, different geometric dimensions of specimens significantly influenced the tensile properties of UHPC. Based on the experimental results, conversion factors were suggested for the transformation of strength obtained from specimens with different geometric dimensions to reference specimens. In addition, both compressive and tensile constitutive laws were proposed to generate the stress–strain relationship of UHPC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ma15093027

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of steel fibers in UHPC-filled steel tube members can significantly improve the ductility, compressive ultimate bearing capacity, and flexural ultimate bearing capacity of these members.

    “The use of steel fibers in UHPC-filled steel tube (UHPC-FST) members can significantly improve the ductility, as well as compressive and flexural ultimate bearing capacity, of these members [19,20,21,22,23].”

    From Bond-Slip Performances of Ultra-High Performance Concrete Steel Tube Columns Made of a Large-Diameter Steel Tube with Internally Welded Steel Bars (2023) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction says steel fibers can change brittle UHPC failure to ductile failure, and the Conclusions report improved compressive properties with increasing fiber content. But the paper tests UHPC specimens, not UHPC-filled steel tube members, and does not establish improved compressive or flexural ultimate bearing capacity for those members. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Nielsen C.V. Ultra High-Strength Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Part 1. Basic StrengthProperties of Compresit Matrix (with Review on Properties of Fibre Reinforced and High-Strength Concrete) Technical University of Denmark Lyngby, Denmark 1995
  2. [39]Naaman A.E. Tensile Strain-Hardening FRC Composites: Historical Evolution Since the 1960 Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2007

Authors
Fang, H., Gu, M., Zhang, S., Jiang, H., Fang, Z., & Hu, J.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
  • Guangzhou Communication Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511400, China
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Jiang, Haibo
Venue
Materials
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-04-21
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
3027
ISSN
1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224321004
Cited by
48
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778150)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Fire effects on concrete materials
Keywords
ultra-high performance concrete, steel fibers, fiber volume content, hooked-end steel fibers, specimen geometry, dog-bone specimens, stress-strain behavior, constitutive equations, elastic modulus, tensile strength, compressive strength, curing time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review