Cited by 8Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is Initial Misdiagnosis Associated with Reaching Disability Milestones in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis?

Open access

Abstract

Background and objectives: multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disorder of the CNS with a variable course and disability progression. The latter may be prevented with disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Initial misdiagnosis may postpone the use of DMT. There are no studies to explore whether initial misdiagnosis is indeed associated with a higher rate of reaching disability in MS patients. We aimed to investigate the association between initial misdiagnosis and reaching disability milestones in relapsing-remitting MS (RR-MS) patients. Materials and methods: Data from 128 RR-MS patients were retrospectively reviewed. EDSS 4 and EDSS 6 were chosen as disability milestones as those associated with a significant decrease in ambulation. Survival analysis was used, and Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to investigate how initial misdiagnosis affects reaching the defined milestones. Results: 53 patients (41.4%, 31 females, 22 males) were initially misdiagnosed. Initially misdiagnosed patients had a lesser risk of reaching EDSS 4 up to 11 years and EDSS 6 up to 22 years from the onset than non-misdiagnosed patients (p = 0.22 and p = 0.25 correspondingly). Median time to reaching EDSS 4 and 6 was eight years (95% CI 0.0–17.6) and 10 years (95% CI 4.25–20.75) in misdiagnosed and three years (95% CI 0.0–20.0 years) and five years (95% CI 0.0–13.73 years) in non-misdiagnosed patients correspondingly. Conclusions: Initially misdiagnosed RR-MS patients tended to reach disability milestones later than non-misdiagnosed ones, which might reflect an intrinsically milder disease. Individuals presenting with mild or non-specific symptoms suspicious of MS, must be deliberately managed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/medicina56040170

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Conditions patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS) were initially misdiagnosed with.
Figure 1 Conditions patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS) were initially misdiagnosed with.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 (a) Kaplan–Meier curves for reaching EDSS 4 in misdiagnosed and not misdiagnosed patients; (b) Kaplan–Meier curves for reaching EDSS 6 in misdiagnosed and not misdiagnosed patients.
Figure 2 (a) Kaplan–Meier curves for reaching EDSS 4 in misdiagnosed and not misdiagnosed patients; (b) Kaplan–Meier curves for reaching EDSS 6 in misdiagnosed and not misdiagnosed patients.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Thompson, 2018, Multiple sclerosis, Lancet, 391, 1622, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30481-1 · DOI
  2. Goodin, 2014, The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis: Insights to disease pathogenesis, Handb. Clin. Neurol., 122, 231, 10.1016/B978-0-444-52001-2.00010-8 · DOI
  3. Lublin, 2014, Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: The 2013 revisions, Neurology, 83, 278, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000560 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Jokubaitis, 2016, Predictors of long-term disability accrual in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis, Ann. Neurol., 80, 89, 10.1002/ana.24682 · DOI
  5. Phua, 2013, Cognitive aspect of diagnostic errors, Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore, 42, 33, 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V42N1p33 · DOI
  6. Hardiman, 2017, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Lancet, 390, 2084, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31287-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Ivaniuk, A., Marusich, T., Solodovnikova, Y., & Son, A.
Affiliations
Odessa National Medical University (UA)
Corresponding author
Ivaniuk, Alina
Venue
Medicina
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-04-10
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
170
ISSN
  • 1010-660X (ISSN-L)
  • 1648-9144
OpenAlex
W3015776398
Cited by
8
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicina (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, disability progression, Expanded Disability Status Scale, disease-modifying therapy, ambulation, disease severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnostic Errors, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review