The DOI matches its Crossref record; 139 of the 139 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progress of Nanocomposite Membranes for Water Treatment
Open accessAbstract
The use of membrane-based technologies has been applied for water treatment applications; however, the limitations of conventional polymeric membranes have led to the addition of inorganic fillers to enhance their performance. In recent years, nanocomposite membranes have greatly attracted the attention of scientists for water treatment applications such as wastewater treatment, water purification, removal of microorganisms, chemical compounds, heavy metals, etc. The incorporation of different nanofillers, such as carbon nanotubes, zinc oxide, graphene oxide, silver and copper nanoparticles, titanium dioxide, 2D materials, and some other novel nano-scale materials into polymeric membranes have provided great advances, e.g., enhancing on hydrophilicity, suppressing the accumulation of pollutants and foulants, enhancing rejection efficiencies and improving mechanical properties and thermal stabilities. Thereby, the aim of this work is to provide up-to-date information related to those novel nanocomposite membranes and their contribution for water treatment applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes
Robeson, L. M. (1991) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-j · Cited by 3,465
Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment
Qu, X., Alvarez, P. J. J., & Li, Q. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058 · Cited by 2,444
A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies
Pendergast, M. M., & Hoek, E. M. V. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00541j · Cited by 2,078
Advanced functional polymer membranes
Ulbricht, M. (2006) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.084 · Cited by 2,029
Strain specificity in antimicrobial activity of silver and copper nanoparticles
Ruparelia, J. P., Chatterjee, A. K., Duttagupta, S. P., & Mukherji, S. (2008) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2007.11.006 · Cited by 1,885
WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality.
SAYATO, Y. (1989) · Eisei kagaku · doi:10.1248/jhs1956.35.307 · Cited by 1,652
Ultrathin Graphene Nanofiltration Membrane for Water Purification
Han, Y., Xu, Z., & Gao, C. (2013) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201202601 · Cited by 1,607
Characterisation of copper oxide nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications
Ren, G., Hu, D., Cheng, E. W. C., Vargas-Reus, M. A., Reip, P., & Allaker, R. P. (2009) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.12.004 · Cited by 1,604
Nanosilver as a new generation of nanoproduct in biomedical applications
Chaloupka, K., Malam, Y., & Seifalian, A. M. (2010) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.07.006 · Cited by 1,451
A review on membrane fabrication: Structure, properties and performance relationship
Lalia, B. S., Kochkodan, V., Hashaikeh, R., & Hilal, N. (2013) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.016 · Cited by 1,109
Metadata
- Authors
- Ursino, C., Castro-Muñoz, R., Drioli, E., Gzara, L., Albeirutty, M., & Figoli, A.
- Venue
- Membranes
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-04-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 18
- ISSN
- 2077-0375 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2795755959
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 139
- FWCI
- 12.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress of Nanocomposite Membranes for Water Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/membranes8020018
- The paper
- Ursino, C., Castro-Muñoz, R., Drioli, E., Gzara, L., Albeirutty, M., & Figoli, A. (2018). Progress of Nanocomposite Membranes for Water Treatment. Membranes. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8020018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
