Cited by 18Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyProbiotics and Fermented FoodsBacteriophages and microbial interactions

Genome Sequencing of five Lacticaseibacillus Strains and Analysis of Type I and II Toxin-Antitoxin System Distribution

Open access
Levante, Alessia, Lazzi, Camilla, Vatsellas, Giannis, Chatzopoulos, Dimitris, Dionellis, Vasilis S., Makrythanasis, Periklis, Neviani, Erasmo, Folli, Claudia·2021·Microorganisms

Abstract

The analysis of bacterial genomes is a potent tool to investigate the distribution of specific traits related to the ability of surviving in particular environments. Among the traits associated with the adaptation to hostile conditions, toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems have recently gained attention in lactic acid bacteria. In this work, genome sequences of Lacticaseibacillus strains of dairy origin were compared, focusing on the distribution of type I TA systems homologous to Lpt/RNAII and of the most common type II TA systems. A high number of TA systems have been identified spread in all the analyzed strains, with type I TA systems mainly located on plasmid DNA. The type II TA systems identified in these strains highlight the diversity of encoded toxins and antitoxins and their organization. This study opens future perspectives on the use of genomic data as a resource for the study of TA systems distribution and prevalence in microorganisms of industrial relevance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/microorganisms9030648

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The whey left after manufacturing has a unique temperature, chemical composition, and microflora, varying by species and biotypes depending on the chosen technology and type of milk.

    “The whey left after manufacturing has a unique temperature, chemical composition, and microflora, varying by species and biotypes depending on the chosen technology and type of milk [21,59,73,76,80,109,110,111,112].”

    From Microbiota of Cheese Ecosystems: A Perspective on Cheesemaking (2025) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Introduction discusses diversity among dairy-associated Lacticaseibacillus strains, and the Discussion addresses their adaptation to cheese environments. Neither section addresses the temperature, chemical composition, or microflora of whey left after manufacturing, or how those properties vary with production technology and milk type (searched: whey composition, microflora, processing technology). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levante, A., Lazzi, C., Vatsellas, G., Chatzopoulos, D., Dionellis, V. S., Makrythanasis, P., Neviani, E., & Folli, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens (GR)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Levante, Alessia
  • Folli, Claudia
Venue
Microorganisms
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-03-21
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
648
ISSN
2076-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3137465827
Cited by
18
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microorganisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Università degli Studi di Parma
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Keywords
Lacticaseibacillus, lactic acid bacteria, toxin-antitoxin systems, type I toxin-antitoxin systems, type II toxin-antitoxin systems, plasmids, comparative genomics, dairy bacteria, stress adaptation, industrial microorganisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review