Cited by 85Bacterial Infections and VaccinesInfectious Encephalopathies and EncephalitisInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

The Impact and Burden of Neurological Sequelae Following Bacterial Meningitis: A Narrative Review

Open access
Schiess, Nicoline, Groce, Nora E., Dua, Tarun·2021·Microorganisms

Abstract

The burden, impact, and social and economic costs of neurological sequelae following meningitis can be devastating to patients, families and communities. An acute inflammation of the brain and spinal cord, meningitis results in high mortality rates, with over 2.5 million new cases of bacterial meningitis and over 236,000 deaths worldwide in 2019 alone. Up to 30% of survivors have some type of neurological or neuro-behavioural sequelae. These include seizures, hearing and vision loss, cognitive impairment, neuromotor disability and memory or behaviour changes. Few studies have documented the long-term (greater than five years) consequences or have parsed out whether the age at time of meningitis contributes to poor outcome. Knowledge of the socioeconomic impact and demand for medical follow-up services among these patients and their caregivers is also lacking, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Within resource-limited settings, the costs incurred by patients and their families can be very high. This review summarises the available evidence to better understand the impact and burden of the neurological sequelae and disabling consequences of bacterial meningitis, with particular focus on identifying existing gaps in LMICs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/microorganisms9050900

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]World Health Organization (WHO) Meningitis Weekly Bulletin 2019 (2–29 December 2019) WHO Geneva, Switzerland 2019

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schiess, N., Groce, N. E., & Dua, T.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Schiess, Nicoline
Venue
Microorganisms
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-04-22
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
900
ISSN
2076-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3154677181
Cited by
85
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microorganisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
bacterial meningitis, neurological sequelae, long-term outcomes, seizures, hearing loss, vision loss, cognitive impairment, neuromotor disabilities, socioeconomic burden, caregiver burden, low- and middle-income countries, age at infection, resource-limited settings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review