The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial Activity of Five Herbal Extracts Against Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) Strains of Bacteria and Fungus of Clinical Origin
Open accessAbstract
Antimicrobial activities of the crude ethanolic extracts of five plants were screened against multidrug resistant (MDR) strains of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Candida albicans. ATCCstrains of Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus bovis, Pseudimonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Candida albicans were also tested. The strains that showed resistance against the maximum number of antibiotics tested were selected for an antibacterial assay. The MDR strains were sensitive to the antimicrobial activity of Acacia nilotica, Syzygium aromaticum and Cinnamum zeylanicum, whereas they exhibited strong resistance to the extracts of Terminalia arjuna and Eucalyptus globulus. Community-acquired infections showed higher sensitivity than the nosocomial infections against these extracts. The most potent antimicrobial plant was A. nilotica (MIC range 9.75-313µg/ml), whereas other crude plant extracts studied in this report were found to exhibit higher MIC values than A. nilotica against community acquired as well as nosocomial infection. This study concludes that A. nilotica, C. zeylanicum and S. aromaticum can be used against multidrug resistant microbes causing nosocomial and community acquired infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
Bruck, E. (1980) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.65.1.187 · Cited by 14,751
In vitro antibacterial activity of some plant essential oils
Prabuseenivasan, S., Jayakumar, M., & Ignacimuthu, S. (2006) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/1472-6882-6-39 · Cited by 1,030
The future challenges facing the development of new antimicrobial drugs
Coates, A., Hu, Y., Bax, R., & Page, C. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd940 · Cited by 704
López, P., Sánchez, C., Batlle, R., & Nerín, C. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf050709v · Cited by 674
Akram, M., Shahid, M., & Khan, A. U. (2007) · Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials · doi:10.1186/1476-0711-6-4 · Cited by 561
Self-citationRole of chemopreventive agents in cancer therapy
Dorai, T., & Aggarwal, B. B. (2004) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2004.07.013 · Cited by 529
Activity and mechanisms of action of selected biocidal agents on Gram-positive and-negative bacteria
Walsh, S. E., Maillard, J.-Y., Russell, A. D., Catrenich, C. E., Charbonneau, D. L., & Bartolo, R. G. (2003) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01825.x · Cited by 527
Prospects for plant-derived antibacterials
Lewis, K., & Ausubel, F. M. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1206-1504 · Cited by 474
Kao, A. S., Brandt, M. E., Pruitt, W. R., Conn, L. A., Perkins, B. A., Stephens, D. S., Baughman, W. S., Reingold, A. L., Rothrock, G. A., Pfaller, M. A., et al. (1999) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/313450 · Cited by 457
Wang, S.-Y., Chen, P.-F., & Chang, S.-T. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.07.010 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Lengai, G. M. W., Muthomi, J. W., & Mbega, E. R. (2020) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00239 · Cited by 516
Antimicrobial Activity of Polyphenols and Natural Polyphenolic Extracts on Clinical Isolates
Manso, T., Lores, M., & de Miguel, T. (2021) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics11010046 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, R., Islam, B., Akram, M., Shakil, S., Ahmad, A. A., Ali, S. M., Siddiqui, M., & Khan, A. U.
- Venue
- Molecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2009-02-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 586-597
- ISSN
- 1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099527278
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 25.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Activity of Five Herbal Extracts Against Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) Strains of Bacteria and Fungus of Clinical Origin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/molecules14020586
- The paper
- Khan, R., Islam, B., Akram, M., Shakil, S., Ahmad, A. A., Ali, S. M., Siddiqui, M., & Khan, A. U. (2009). Antimicrobial Activity of Five Herbal Extracts Against Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) Strains of Bacteria and Fungus of Clinical Origin. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules14020586
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.