The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological Activities of a-Pinene and β-Pinene Enantiomers
Open accessAbstract
The antimicrobial activities of the isomers and enantiomers of pinene were evaluated against bacterial and fungal cells. The agar diffusion test showed that only the positive enantiomers of the a- and β-isomers of pinene were active. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal microbicidal concentration (MMC) of these monoterpenes were also determined, confirming that the positive enantiomers exhibited microbicidal activity against all fungi and bacteria tested with MICs ranging from 117 to 4,150 µg/mL. However, no antimicrobial activity was detected with the negative enantiomers up to 20 mg/mL. Time-kill curves showed that (+)-a-pinene and (+)-β-pinene were highly toxic to Candida albicans, killing 100% of inoculum within 60 min. By contrast, the bactericidal effect occurred after 6 h in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In combination with commercial antimicrobials, ciprofloxacin plus (+)-a-pinene or (+)-β-pinene presented synergistic activity against MRSA whereas an indifferent effect against all fungi was detected when amphotericin B was combined with the positive enantiomers of pinene. The potential of (+)-a-pinene and (+)-β-pinene to inhibit phospholipase and esterase activities was also evaluated, and the best inhibition results were obtained with Cryptococcus neoformans. C. albicans biofilm formation was prevented with the MIC concentration of (+)-a-pinene and twice the MIC value of (+)-β-pinene. Finally, the cytotoxicity of the positive enantiomers of pinene to murine macrophages was evaluated, and 250 µg/mL of (+)-a-pinene and (+)-β-pinene reduced the cell viability to 66.8% and 57.7%, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Terpenoids inhibit Candida albicans growth by affecting membrane integrity and arrest of cell cycle
Zore, G. B., Thakre, A. D., Jadhav, S., & Karuppayil, S. M. (2011) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2011.03.008 · Cited by 319
Mowat, E., Butcher, J., Lang, S., Williams, C., & Ramage, G. (2007) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.47247-0 · Cited by 259
Cited by
Therapeutic Potential of α- and β-Pinene: A Miracle Gift of Nature
Salehi, B., Upadhyay, S., Erdogan Orhan, I., Kumar Jugran, A., L.D. Jayaweera, S., A. Dias, D., Sharopov, F., Taheri, Y., Martins, N., Baghalpour, N., et al. (2019) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom9110738 · Cited by 696
Fiorini, D., Scortichini, S., Bonacucina, G., Greco, N. G., Mazzara, E., Petrelli, R., Torresi, J., Maggi, F., & Cespi, M. (2020) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112688 · Cited by 102
Asteggiano, A., Occhipinti, A., Capuzzo, A., Mecarelli, E., Aigotti, R., & Medana, C. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26051447 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Silva, A. C. R. D., Lopes, P. M., Azevedo, M. M. B. D., Costa, D. C. M., Alviano, C. S., & Alviano, D. S.
- Venue
- Molecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2012-05-25
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 6305-6316
- ISSN
- 1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092061024
- Cited by
- 694
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Activities of a-Pinene and β-Pinene Enantiomers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/molecules17066305
- The paper
- Silva, A. C. R. D., Lopes, P. M., Azevedo, M. M. B. D., Costa, D. C. M., Alviano, C. S., & Alviano, D. S. (2012). Biological Activities of a-Pinene and β-Pinene Enantiomers. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17066305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.