The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Injectable Polymeric Hydrogel Systems for Application in Bone Tissue Engineering
Open accessAbstract
Biodegradable, stimuli-responsive polymers are essential platforms in the field of drug delivery and injectable biomaterials for application of bone tissue engineering. Various thermo-responsive hydrogels display water-based homogenous properties to encapsulate, manipulate and transfer its contents to the surrounding tissue, in the least invasive manner. The success of bioengineered injectable tissue modified delivery systems depends significantly on their chemical, physical and biological properties. Irrespective of shape and defect geometry, injectable therapy has an unparalleled advantage in which intricate therapy sites can be effortlessly targeted with minimally invasive procedures. Using material testing, it was found that properties of stimuli-responsive hydrogel systems enhance cellular responses and cell distribution at any site prior to the transitional phase leading to gelation. The substantially hydrated nature allows significant simulation of the extracellular matrix (ECM), due to its similar structural properties. Significant current research strategies have been identified and reported to date by various institutions, with particular attention to thermo-responsive hydrogel delivery systems, and their pertinent focus for bone tissue engineering. Research on future perspective studies which have been proposed for evaluation, have also been reported in this review, directing considerable attention to the modification of delivering natural and synthetic polymers, to improve their biocompatibility and mechanical properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications
Drury, J. L., & Mooney, D. J. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00340-5 · Cited by 5,136
Pluronic® block copolymers as novel polymer therapeutics for drug and gene delivery
Kabanov, A. V., Batrakova, E. V., & Alakhov, V. Y. (2002) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(02)00009-3 · Cited by 1,474
Bioerodible polyphosphazenes and their medical potential
Allcock, H. R., & Morozowich, N. L. (2012) · Polym. Chem. · doi:10.1039/c1py00468a · Cited by 152
Cited by
Multicomponent peptide assemblies
Raymond, D. M., & Nilsson, B. L. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00115d · Cited by 346
Recent advances of injectable hydrogels for drug delivery and tissue engineering applications
Sun, Y., Nan, D., Jin, H., & Qu, X. (2020) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106283 · Cited by 227
Hibbins, A., Kumar, P., Choonara, Y., Kondiah, P., Marimuthu, T., Du Toit, L., & Pillay, V. (2017) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym9100474 · Cited by 57
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kondiah, P., Choonara, Y., Kondiah, P., Marimuthu, T., Kumar, P., Du Toit, L., & Pillay, V.
- Venue
- Molecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2016-11-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1580
- ISSN
- 1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2554078940
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Injectable Polymeric Hydrogel Systems for Application in Bone Tissue Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/molecules21111580
- The paper
- Kondiah, P., Choonara, Y., Kondiah, P., Marimuthu, T., Kumar, P., Du Toit, L., & Pillay, V. (2016). A Review of Injectable Polymeric Hydrogel Systems for Application in Bone Tissue Engineering. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21111580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.