The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Roads Leading to Old Destinations: Efflux Pumps as Targets to Reverse Multidrug Resistance in Bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Multidrug resistance (MDR) has appeared in response to selective pressures resulting from the incorrect use of antibiotics and other antimicrobials. This inappropriate application and mismanagement of antibiotics have led to serious problems in the therapy of infectious diseases. Bacteria can develop resistance by various mechanisms and one of the most important factors resulting in MDR is efflux pump-mediated resistance. Because of the importance of the efflux-related multidrug resistance the development of new therapeutic approaches aiming to inhibit bacterial efflux pumps is a promising way to combat bacteria having over-expressed MDR efflux systems. The definition of an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI) includes the ability to render the bacterium increasingly more sensitive to a given antibiotic or even reverse the multidrug resistant phenotype. In the recent years numerous EPIs have been developed, although so far their clinical application has not yet been achieved due to their in vivo toxicity and side effects. In this review, we aim to give a short overview of efflux mediated resistance in bacteria, EPI compounds of plant and synthetic origin, and the possible methods to investigate and screen EPI compounds in bacterial systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions
Laxminarayan, R., Duse, A., Wattal, C., Zaidi, A. K. M., Wertheim, H. F. L., Sumpradit, N., Vlieghe, E., Hara, G. L., Gould, I. M., Goossens, H., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70318-9 · Cited by 4,439
Clinically Relevant Chromosomally Encoded Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps in Bacteria
Piddock, L. J. V. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.19.2.382-402.2006 · Cited by 1,231
Antifungal drug resistance: mechanisms, epidemiology, and consequences for treatment
Pfaller, M. A. (2012) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.11.001 · Cited by 903
Inhibition of the Multidrug Resistance P-Glycoprotein: Time for a Change of Strategy?
Callaghan, R., Luk, F., & Bebawy, M. (2014) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.113.056176 · Cited by 453
Nikaido, H., Basina, M., Nguyen, V., & Rosenberg, E. Y. (1998) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.180.17.4686-4692.1998 · Cited by 224
Targeting Efflux Pumps to Overcome Antifungal Drug Resistance
Holmes, A. R., Cardno, T. S., Strouse, J. J., Ivnitski-Steele, I., Keniya, M. V., Lackovic, K., Monk, B. C., Sklar, L. A., & Cannon, R. D. (2016) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc-2016-0050 · Cited by 156
Koonin, E. V. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.8737.1 · Cited by 152
Synergistic effect of promethazine with gentamycin in frequently recurring pyelonephritis
Molnár, J., Haszon, I., Bodrogi, T., Martonyi, E., & Turi, S. (1990) · International Urology and Nephrology · doi:10.1007/bf02549770 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Spengler, G., Kincses, A., Gajdács, M., & Amaral, L.
- Venue
- Molecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-03-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 468
- ISSN
- 1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2597266501
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.