Cited by 35Crystallography and molecular interactionsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

The significance of halogen bonding in ligand–receptor interactions: the lesson learned from molecular dynamic simulations of the D4 receptor

Open access
Kurczab, Rafał, Kucwaj-Brysz, Katarzyna, Śliwa, Paweł·2019·Molecules

Abstract

Recently, a computational approach combining a structure–activity relationship library containing pairs of halogenated ligands and their corresponding unsubstituted ligands (called XSAR) with QM-based molecular docking and binding free energy calculations was developed and used to search for amino acids frequently targeted by halogen bonding, also known as XB hot spots. However, the analysis of ligand–receptor complexes with halogen bonds obtained by molecular docking provides a limited ability to study the role and significance of halogen bonding in biological systems. Thus, a set of molecular dynamics simulations for the dopamine D4 receptor, recently crystallized with the antipsychotic drug nemonapride (5WIU), and the five XSAR sets were performed to verify the identified hot spots for halogen bonding, in other words, primary (V5x40), and secondary (S5x43, S5x461 and H6x55). The simulations confirmed the key role of halogen bonding with V5x40 and H6x55 and supported S5x43 and S5x461. The results showed that steric restrictions and the topology of the molecular core have a crucial impact on the stabilization of the ligand–receptor complex by halogen bonding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules25010091

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From a synthesis point-of-view, the emergence of brorphine analogues differing in the halogen substituent seems not only feasible (only involving a one-step procedure), but may actually be likely, as halogenation is an important tool in drug optimization.

    “Specifically, from a synthesis point-of-view, the emergence of brorphine analogues differing in the halogen substituent seems not only feasible (only involving a one-step procedure), but may actually be likely, as halogenation is an important tool in drug optimization (Hernandes et al., 2010; Kurczab et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2014).”

    From Elucidating the harm potential of brorphine analogues as new synthetic opioids: Synthesis, in vitro, and in vivo characterization (2024) · cites this paper as Kurczab et al., 2019

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurczab, R., Kucwaj-Brysz, K., & Śliwa, P.
Affiliations
  • Maj Institute of Pharmacology (PL)
  • Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Maj Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Smętna 12, 31-343 Cracow, Poland
  • Cracow University of Technology (PL)
Corresponding author
Kurczab, Rafał
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-12-25
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
91
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998719613
Cited by
31
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki (DEC-2014/15/D/NZ7/01782)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Crystallography and molecular interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
halogen bonding, dopamine D4 receptor, nemonapride, ligand-receptor interactions, structure-activity relationship, binding free energy, molecular dynamics simulation, antipsychotic drugs, ligand stabilization
MeSH terms
Halogens, Ligands, Structure-Activity Relationship, Receptors, Dopamine D4, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review