The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Antibiotics for Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Strains: Latest Research Developments and Future Perspectives
Open accessAbstract
The present work aims to examine the worrying problem of antibiotic resistance and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacterial strains, which have now become really common in hospitals and risk hindering the global control of infectious diseases. After a careful examination of these phenomena and multiple mechanisms that make certain bacteria resistant to specific antibiotics that were originally effective in the treatment of infections caused by the same pathogens, possible strategies to stem antibiotic resistance are analyzed. This paper, therefore, focuses on the most promising new chemical compounds in the current pipeline active against multidrug-resistant organisms that are innovative compared to traditional antibiotics: Firstly, the main antibacterial agents in clinical development (Phase III) from 2017 to 2020 are listed (with special attention on the treatment of infections caused by the pathogens Neisseria gonorrhoeae, including multidrug-resistant isolates, and Clostridium difficile), and then the paper moves on to the new agents of pharmacological interest that have been approved during the same period. They include tetracycline derivatives (eravacycline), fourth generation fluoroquinolones (delafloxacin), new combinations between one β-lactam and one β-lactamase inhibitor (meropenem and vaborbactam), siderophore cephalosporins (cefiderocol), new aminoglycosides (plazomicin), and agents in development for treating drug-resistant TB (pretomanid). It concludes with the advantages that can result from the use of these compounds, also mentioning other approaches, still poorly developed, for combating antibiotic resistance: Nanoparticles delivery systems for antibiotics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McDonald, L. C., Gerding, D. N., Johnson, S., Bakken, J. S., Carroll, K. C., Coffin, S. E., Dubberke, E. R., Garey, K. W., Gould, C. V., Kelly, C., et al. (2018) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cix1085 · Cited by 2,690
Drugs for bad bugs: confronting the challenges of antibacterial discovery
Payne, D. J., Gwynn, M. N., Holmes, D. J., & Pompliano, D. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2201 · Cited by 2,512
Ito, A., Nishikawa, T., Matsumoto, S., Yoshizawa, H., Sato, T., Nakamura, R., Tsuji, M., & Yamano, Y. (2016) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01405-16 · Cited by 352
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance in microbes: History, mechanisms, therapeutic strategies and future prospects
Uddin, T. M., Chakraborty, A. J., Khusro, A., Zidan, B. R. M., Mitra, S., Emran, T. B., Dhama, K., Ripon, M. K. H., Gajdács, M., Sahibzada, M. U. K., et al. (2021) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2021.10.020 · Cited by 1,311
Mining the UniProtKB /Swiss‐Prot database for antimicrobial peptides
Li, C., Sutherland, D., Salehi, A., Richter, A., Lin, D., Aninta, S. I., Ebrahimikondori, H., Yanai, A., Coombe, L., Warren, R. L., et al. (2025) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.70083 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Terreni, M., Taccani, M., & Pregnolato, M.
- Venue
- Molecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-05-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2671
- ISSN
- 1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159592417
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Antibiotics for Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Strains: Latest Research Developments and Future Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/molecules26092671
- The paper
- Terreni, M., Taccani, M., & Pregnolato, M. (2021). New Antibiotics for Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Strains: Latest Research Developments and Future Perspectives. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092671
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.