The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mining the UniProtKB /Swiss‐Prot database for antimicrobial peptides
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The ever‐growing global health threat of antibiotic resistance is compelling researchers to explore alternatives to conventional antibiotics. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are emerging as a promising solution to fill this need. Naturally occurring AMPs are produced by all forms of life as part of the innate immune system. High‐throughput bioinformatics tools have enabled fast and large‐scale discovery of AMPs from genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic resources of selected organisms. Public protein sequence databases, comprising over 200 million records and growing, serve as comprehensive compendia of sequences from a broad range of source organisms. Yet, large‐scale in silico probing of those databases for novel AMP discovery using modern deep learning techniques has rarely been reported. In the present study, we propose an AMP mining workflow to predict novel AMPs from the UniProtKB/Swiss‐Prot database using the AMP prediction tool, AMPlify, as its discovery engine. Using this workflow, we identified 8008 novel putative AMPs from all eukaryotic sequences in the database. Focusing on the practical use of AMPs as suitable antimicrobial agents with applications in the poultry industry, we prioritized 40 of those AMPs based on their similarities to known chicken AMPs in predicted structures. In our tests, 13 out of the 38 successfully synthesized peptides showed antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli and/or Staphylococcus aureus . AMPlify and the companion scripts supporting the AMP mining workflow presented herein are publicly available at https://github.com/bcgsc/AMPlify .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Defensins in innate antiviral immunity
Klotman, M. E., & Chang, T. L. (2006) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1860 · Cited by 471
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- Alberts B, 2002, Molecular biology of the cell
- 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.07.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3923/ijps.2009.404.408 · DOI
- 10.1186/rr25 · DOI
- 10.2174/092986608784567618 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01228.x · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms21124310 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00073 · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.43.1.1 · DOI
- dosSantos SR Miranda A daSilva Junior PI.2022.Ovipin: a new antimicrobial peptide from chicken eggsGallus gallus. bioRxivhttps://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.28.462162. · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/gzh013 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00381 · DOI
- 10.1162/089976600300015015 · DOI
- 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9362 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-38442-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.21123 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00726-017-2402-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.04.027 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-13618-z · DOI
- 10.1002/pep2.24122 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Li C, 2023, Candidate antimicrobial peptide sequences mined from the UniProtKB/Swiss‐Prot database using AMPlify
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.04.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12864-022-08310-4 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13104-023-06279-1 · DOI
- 10.3390/antibiotics11070952 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep42362 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts141 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000857 · DOI
- 10.5772/intechopen.76631 · DOI
- 10.3390/md19060328 · DOI
- 10.1038/509141a · DOI
- 10.3390/antibiotics11121710 · DOI
- 10.1109/78.650093 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bib/bbab065 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1390765 · DOI
- 10.3390/molecules26092671 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky1049 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/proteomes7040032 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-981-13-3588-4_10 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.03.003 · DOI
- Vaswani A, 2017, Advances in neural information processing systems
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty179 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep24684 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1157 · DOI
- 10.3390/biom11030471 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkv1278 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2007.521 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2174/1568026619666190122151634 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M507180200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2013.01.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.05.006 · DOI
- 10.18653/v1/N16-1174 · DOI
- 10.1109/BIBM.2017.8217697 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.017 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C., Sutherland, D., Salehi, A., Richter, A., Lin, D., Aninta, S. I., Ebrahimikondori, H., Yanai, A., Coombe, L., Warren, R. L., Kotkoff, M., Hoang, L. M. N., Helbing, C. C., & Birol, I.
- Affiliations
- BC Cancer Agency (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre BC Cancer Agency Vancouver British Columbia Canada
- ORCID
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-03-18
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e70083-e70083
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- PMC
- PMC11917140
- OpenAlex
- W4408538820
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Genome Canada (291PEP)
- Genome British Columbia (291PEP)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- antimicrobial peptides, UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, antibiotic resistance, eukaryotic proteins, poultry, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, peptide synthesis, innate immunity
- MeSH terms
- Antimicrobial Peptides, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Chickens, Staphylococcus aureus, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein, Data Mining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review