Cited by 9Antimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mining the UniProtKB /Swiss‐Prot database for antimicrobial peptides

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The ever‐growing global health threat of antibiotic resistance is compelling researchers to explore alternatives to conventional antibiotics. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are emerging as a promising solution to fill this need. Naturally occurring AMPs are produced by all forms of life as part of the innate immune system. High‐throughput bioinformatics tools have enabled fast and large‐scale discovery of AMPs from genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic resources of selected organisms. Public protein sequence databases, comprising over 200 million records and growing, serve as comprehensive compendia of sequences from a broad range of source organisms. Yet, large‐scale in silico probing of those databases for novel AMP discovery using modern deep learning techniques has rarely been reported. In the present study, we propose an AMP mining workflow to predict novel AMPs from the UniProtKB/Swiss‐Prot database using the AMP prediction tool, AMPlify, as its discovery engine. Using this workflow, we identified 8008 novel putative AMPs from all eukaryotic sequences in the database. Focusing on the practical use of AMPs as suitable antimicrobial agents with applications in the poultry industry, we prioritized 40 of those AMPs based on their similarities to known chicken AMPs in predicted structures. In our tests, 13 out of the 38 successfully synthesized peptides showed antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli and/or Staphylococcus aureus . AMPlify and the companion scripts supporting the AMP mining workflow presented herein are publicly available at https://github.com/bcgsc/AMPlify .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.70083

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Alberts B, 2002, Molecular biology of the cell
  2. 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.07.021 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.3923/ijps.2009.404.408 · DOI
  5. 10.1186/rr25 · DOI
  6. 10.2174/092986608784567618 · DOI
  7. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01228.x · DOI
  8. 10.3390/ijms21124310 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00073 · DOI
  10. 10.1128/AAC.43.1.1 · DOI
  11. dosSantos SR Miranda A daSilva Junior PI.2022.Ovipin: a new antimicrobial peptide from chicken eggsGallus gallus. bioRxivhttps://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.28.462162. · DOI
  12. 10.1093/protein/gzh013 · DOI
  13. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00381 · DOI
  14. 10.1162/089976600300015015 · DOI
  15. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9362 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41598-018-38442-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/prot.21123 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s00726-017-2402-9 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.04.027 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/s41467-019-13618-z · DOI
  21. 10.1002/pep2.24122 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Li C, 2023, Candidate antimicrobial peptide sequences mined from the UniProtKB/Swiss‐Prot database using AMPlify
  24. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.04.008 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1186/s12864-022-08310-4 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/s13104-023-06279-1 · DOI
  27. 10.3390/antibiotics11070952 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/srep42362 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.05.001 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts141 · DOI
  32. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000857 · DOI
  33. 10.5772/intechopen.76631 · DOI
  34. 10.3390/md19060328 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/509141a · DOI
  36. 10.3390/antibiotics11121710 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/78.650093 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1093/bib/bbab065 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1390765 · DOI
  41. 10.3390/molecules26092671 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/nar/gky1049 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.3390/proteomes7040032 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/978-981-13-3588-4_10 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.03.003 · DOI
  46. Vaswani A, 2017, Advances in neural information processing systems
  47. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty179 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/srep24684 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/nar/gkt1157 · DOI
  50. 10.3390/biom11030471 · DOI
  51. 10.1093/nar/gkv1278 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nprot.2007.521 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.2174/1568026619666190122151634 · DOI
  54. 10.1074/jbc.M507180200 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.ab.2013.01.019 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.05.006 · DOI
  57. 10.18653/v1/N16-1174 · DOI
  58. 10.1109/BIBM.2017.8217697 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.017 · DOI
  60. 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Li, C., Sutherland, D., Salehi, A., Richter, A., Lin, D., Aninta, S. I., Ebrahimikondori, H., Yanai, A., Coombe, L., Warren, R. L., Kotkoff, M., Hoang, L. M. N., Helbing, C. C., & Birol, I.
Affiliations
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre BC Cancer Agency Vancouver British Columbia Canada
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-03-18
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
e70083-e70083
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W4408538820
Cited by
9
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Genome Canada (291PEP)
  • Genome British Columbia (291PEP)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
antimicrobial peptides, UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, antibiotic resistance, eukaryotic proteins, poultry, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, peptide synthesis, innate immunity
MeSH terms
Antimicrobial Peptides, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Chickens, Staphylococcus aureus, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein, Data Mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review