AlphaFold Blindness to Topological Barriers Affects Its Ability to Correctly Predict Proteins’ Topology
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
AlphaFold is a groundbreaking deep learning tool for protein structure prediction. It achieved remarkable accuracy in modeling many 3D structures while taking as the user input only the known amino acid sequence of proteins in question. Intriguingly though, in the early steps of each individual structure prediction procedure, AlphaFold does not respect topological barriers that, in real proteins, result from the reciprocal impermeability of polypeptide chains. This study aims to investigate how this failure to respect topological barriers affects AlphaFold predictions with respect to the topology of protein chains. We focus on such classes of proteins that, during their natural folding, reproducibly form the same knot type on their linear polypeptide chain, as revealed by their crystallographic analysis. We use partially artificial test constructs in which the mutual non-permeability of polypeptide chains should not permit the formation of complex composite knots during natural protein folding. We find that despite the formal impossibility that the protein folding process could produce such knots, AlphaFold predicts these proteins to form complex composite knots. Our study underscores the necessity for cautious interpretation and further validation of topological features in protein structures predicted by AlphaFold.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Following the success, the authors and developers of AlphaFold have created a broadly available, comprehensive database of predicted 3D protein structures, starting from the whole human proteome [15] and later expanding it to over 200 million entries offering a vast potential for exploration.”
BackgroundInfluentialAhdritz, G., Bouatta, N., Floristean, C., Kadyan, S., Xia, Q., Gerecke, W., O’Donnell, T. J., Berenberg, D., Fisk, I., Zanichelli, N., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02272-z · Cited by 439 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This, in turn, fostered numerous modifications and implementations [6–14].”
BackgroundSenior, A. W., Evans, R., Jumper, J., Kirkpatrick, J., Sifre, L., Green, T., Qin, C., Žídek, A., Nelson, A. W. R., Bridgland, A., et al. (2019) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25834 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Using AlphaFold to predict the impact of single mutations on protein stability and function
Pak, M. A., Markhieva, K. A., Novikova, M. S., Petrov, D. S., Vorobyev, I. S., Maksimova, E. S., Kondrashov, F. A., & Ivankov, D. N. (2023) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282689 · Cited by 322 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This effect was studied before in the case of missense mutations [45,46], but it shows that AlphaFold is of limited use in the case of lasso-like proteins [47,48], where the topology can change when introducing or removing single-cysteine residue.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Dabrowski-Tumanski, P., & Stasiak, A.
- Affiliations
- Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, School of Exact Sciences, Cardinal Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
- SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Stasiak, Andrzej
- Venue
- Molecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-11-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7462
- ISSN
- 1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10672856
- OpenAlex
- W4388453703
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- AlphaFold, protein topology prediction, topological barriers, protein knots, composite knots, protein folding, deep learning protein structure prediction
- MeSH terms
- Models, Molecular, Peptides, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Folding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review