Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of Cr(VI) Removal from Tanning Effluents Using Magnetic Nanoparticles of Fe3O4 Synthesized with Olea europaea Bone Extract

Bejarano-Meza, Maria, Deza-Carrasco, Fabricio Eduardo, Salinas-Herrera, Sofia, Flores-Calla, Susan, Jimenez-Pacheco, Hugo Guillermo·2024·Molecules

Abstract

The tanning industry generates effluents with high chromium content, which require treatment prior to discharge into the sewage system. This article explores the use of magnetic magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs) to remove Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions, such as tanning effluents. The MNPs were synthesized by coprecipitation reaction using the Olea europaea extract as a reducing agent. Subsequently, they were characterized by dynamic light scattering spectroscopy (DLS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). MNPs with irregular morphology and diameters ranging from 73.28 to 162.90 nm were obtained. Cr(VI) removal was performed using jar test methodology, and its efficiency was evaluated in the laboratory for different initial Cr(VI) (mg/L) concentration and nanoparticle (g/L) concentration. A kinetic study was developed and indicated that the equilibrium adsorption mechanism corresponds to a pseudo-second-order model. Furthermore, the isotherm analysis revealed that chromium adsorption best fits the Langmuir isotherm. Finally, Cr(VI) removal rates from 85% to 100% were achieved in tanning and retanning effluents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules29020534

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bejarano-Meza et al. used magnetic iron-based nanoparticles synthesized with O. europea bone extract to remove nearly all detectable Cr(VI) from RSIP's tannery effluents.

    “Finally, Bejarano-Meza et al. [45] used magnetic iron-based nanoparticles synthesized with O. europea bone extract to remove nearly all detectable Cr(VI) from RSIP's tannery effluents.”

    From Chromium Remediation from Tannery Wastewater in Arequipa, Peru: Local Experiences and Prospects for Sustainable Solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Experimental Procedure (§3.1) says the effluent samples came from a tannery in Río Seco Industrial Park. The Introduction describes synthesis using Olea europaea bone extract, and Results (§2.4) reports Cr(VI) removal of 85% from tanning effluent and 100% from retanning effluent. Thus, “nearly all” overstates the result for the tanning sample. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bharagava, 2018, Characterization and identification of recalcitrant organic pollutants (rops) in tannery wastewater and its phytotoxicity evaluation for environmental safety, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 75, 259, 10.1007/s00244-017-0490-x · DOI
  2. Esparza, 2001, Contaminación Debida a la Industria Curtiumbre, Rev. Química, 15, 41
  3. Sharma, 2022, Health hazards of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) and its microbial reduction, Bioengineered, 13, 4923, 10.1080/21655979.2022.2037273 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ge, 2012, Effective removal of heavy metal ions Cd2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, Cu2+ from aqueous solution by polymer-modified magnetic nanoparticles, J. Hazard. Mater., 211–212, 366, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.12.013 · DOI
  5. Wang, 2021, Insights into the mechanism of peroxydisulfate activated by magnetic spinel CuFe2O4/SBC as a heterogeneous catalyst for bisphenol S degradation, Chem. Eng. J., 416, 129162, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129162 · DOI
  6. Saif, S., Tahir, A., and Chen, Y. (2016). Green Synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles and Their Environmental Applications and Implications. Nanomaterials, 6. · DOI
  7. Alsaiari, N., Alzahrani, F., Amari, A., Osman, H., Harharah, H., Elboughdiri, N., and Tahoon, M. (2023). Plant and Microbial Approaches as Green Methods for the Synthesis of Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Applications, and Future Perspectives. Molecules, 28. · DOI
  8. Gautam, 2020, Synthesis of M. oleifera leaf extract capped magnetic nanoparticles for effective lead [Pb (II)] removal from solution: Kinetics, isotherm and reusability study, J. Mol. Liq., 305, 112811, 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112811 · DOI
  9. Aragaw, 2021, Iron-based nanoparticles in wastewater treatment: A review on synthesis methods, applications, and removal mechanisms, J. Saudi Chem. Soc., 25, 101280, 10.1016/j.jscs.2021.101280 · DOI
  10. Yew, 2020, Green biosynthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite Fe3O4 nanoparticles and biomedical applications in targeted anticancer drug delivery system: A review, Arab. J. Chem., 13, 2287, 10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.04.013 · DOI
  11. Niculescu, 2022, Magnetite nanoparticles: Synthesis methods—A comparative review, Methods, 199, 16, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.04.018 · DOI
  12. Aftabtalab, 2014, Magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4) synthesis for removal of Chromium (VI) from waste water, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 5, 1419
  13. Hao, R., Li, D., Zhang, J., and Jiao, T. (2021). Green Synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles Using Green Tea and Its Removal of Hexavalent Chromium. Nanomaterials, 11. · DOI
  14. Pacheco-Portugal, J.-D. (2019). Evaluación Del Proceso De Biosorción De Cr(VI) Usando Residuos Agroindustriales De La Región Arequipa (Cascarilla De Arroz Y Chala De Maiz). [Bachelor’s Thesis, Universidad Católica de Santa María, Repositorio Institucional—Universidad Católica de Santa María].
  15. Cañazaca, C., and Ccama, W. (2017). Biosíntesis De Nanopartículas De Hierro Cero Valente (Nzvi) Usando Hojas De Eucalipto (Eucalyptus Sp.) Para La Remoción De Cromo Hexavalente. [Bachelor’s Thesis, Repositorio Institucional UNSA].
  16. Shafey, 2020, Green synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles from plant leaf extracts and their applications: A review, Green Process. Synth., 9, 304, 10.1515/gps-2020-0031 · DOI
  17. Vafaeinezhad, 2016, Green synthesis of magnetic iron nanoparticles coated by olive oil and verifying its efficiency in extraction of nickel from environmental samples via UV–vis spectrophotometry, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 102, 403, 10.1016/j.psep.2016.04.011 · DOI
  18. Fazlzadeh, 2017, A novel green synthesis of zero valent iron nanoparticles (NZVI) using three plant extracts and their efficient application for removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions, Adv. Powder Technol., 28, 122, 10.1016/j.apt.2016.09.003 · DOI
  19. Assi, 2018, Selective solid-phase extraction using 1,5-diphenylcarbazide-modified magnetic nanoparticles for speciation of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in aqueous solutions, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 16, 4739, 10.1007/s13762-018-1868-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bejarano-Meza, M., Deza-Carrasco, F. E., Salinas-Herrera, S., Flores-Calla, S., & Jimenez-Pacheco, H. G.
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-01-22
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
534
ISSN
1420-3049
Cited by
9
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Universidad Católica de Santa María (27574-R-2020)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review