Cited by 26Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningMisinformation and Its Impacts

Using shallow and deep learning to automatically detect hate motivated by gender and sexual orientation on Twitter in Spanish

Open access
Arcila-Calderón, Carlos, Amores, Javier J., Sánchez-Holgado, Patricia, Blanco-Herrero, David·2021·Multimodal Technologies and Interaction

Abstract

The increasing phenomenon of “cyberhate” is concerning because of the potential social implications of this form of verbal violence, which is aimed at already-stigmatized social groups. According to information collected by the Ministry of the Interior of Spain, the category of sexual orientation and gender identity is subject to the third-highest number of registered hate crimes, ranking behind racism/xenophobia and ideology. However, most of the existing computational approaches to online hate detection simultaneously attempt to address all types of discrimination, leading to weaker prototype performances. These approaches focus on other reasons for hate—primarily racism and xenophobia—and usually focus on English messages. Furthermore, few detection models have used manually generated databases as a training corpus. Using supervised machine learning techniques, the present research sought to overcome these limitations by developing and evaluating an automatic detector of hate speech motivated by gender and sexual orientation. The focus was Spanish-language posts on Twitter. For this purpose, eight predictive models were developed from an ad hoc generated training corpus, using shallow modeling and deep learning. The evaluation metrics showed that the deep learning algorithm performed significantly better than the shallow modeling algorithms, and logistic regression yielded the best performance of the shallow algorithms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/mti5100063

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar research has already been undertaken for the automatic detection of sexual prejudice: Arcila-Calderón et al. (2021) used shallow and deep learning to automatically detect hate speech based specifically on gender and sexual orientation.

    “In fact, similar research has already been undertaken for the automatic detection of sexual prejudice: for instance, Arcila-Calderón et al. (2021) used shallow and deep learning to automatically detect hate speech that was based specifically on gender and sexual orientation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Müller, K.; Schwarz, C. Fanning the Flames of Hate: Social Media and Hate Crime. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2021, 19, 2131-2167.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arcila-Calderón, C., Amores, J. J., Sánchez-Holgado, P., & Blanco-Herrero, D.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Social Sciences, Unamuno Campus, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
  • Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Venue
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-10-13
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
63
ISSN
2414-4088 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3206047310
Cited by
24
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Multimodal Technologies and Interaction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Gredos (University of Salamanca) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme (875217)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
online hate speech detection, cyberhate, Twitter, Spanish language, deep learning, shallow learning, logistic regression, training corpus, hate speech detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review