CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review on New 3-D Printed Materials’ Geometries for Catalysis and Adsorption: Paradigms from Reforming Reactions and CO2 Capture

Open access
Soliman, Ahmad, AlAmoodi, Nahla, Karanikolos, Georgios N., Doumanidis, Charalabos C., Polychronopoulou, Kyriaki·2020·Nanomaterials
DOI 10.3390/nano10112198PMC PMC7693986
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

“Bottom-up” additive manufacturing (AM) is the technology whereby a digitally designed structure is built layer-by-layer, i.e., differently than by traditional manufacturing techniques based on subtractive manufacturing. AM, as exemplified by 3D printing, has gained significant importance for scientists, among others, in the fields of catalysis and separation. Undoubtedly, it constitutes an enabling pathway by which new complex, promising and innovative structures can be built. According to recent studies, 3D printing technologies have been utilized in enhancing the heat, mass transfer, adsorption capacity and surface area in CO2 adsorption and separation applications and catalytic reactions. However, intense work is needed in the field to address further challenges in dealing with the materials and metrological features of the structures involved. Although few studies have been performed, the promise is there for future research to decrease carbon emissions and footprint. This review provides an overview on how AM is linked to the chemistry of catalysis and separation with particular emphasis on reforming reactions and carbon adsorption and how efficient it could be in enhancing their performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nano10112198

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent advances in additive manufacturing have significantly enhanced control over the geometry of the structured adsorbent itself.

    “However, recent advances in additive manufacturing have significantly enhanced control over the geometry of the structured adsorbent itself [17, 18].”

    From Topology optimisation of adsorption beds for cost-effective direct air capture (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 168

  1. Kontos, 2014, CO2 Captured in Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks: Raman Spectroscopic Analysis of Uptake and Host-Guest Interactions, ChemSusChem, 7, 1696, 10.1002/cssc.201301323 · DOI
  2. Talapaneni, 2015, Nanoporous Polymers Incorporating Sterically Confined N-Heterocyclic Carbenes for Simultaneous CO2 Capture and Conversion at Ambient Pressure, Chem. Mater., 27, 6818, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03104 · DOI
  3. Kim, 2017, Highly Hydrophobic ZIF-8/Carbon Nitride Foam with Hierarchical Porosity for Oil Capture and Chemical Fixation of CO2, Adv. Funct. Mater., 27, 1
  4. Charisiou, 2017, Hydrogen production via the glycerol steam reforming reaction over nickel supported on alumina and lanthana-alumina catalysts, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 42, 13039, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.048 · DOI
  5. Polychronopoulou, 2012, NOx Control via H2-Selective Catalytic Reduction (H2-SCR) Technology for Stationary and Mobile Applications, Recent Pat. Mater. Sci., 5, 87, 10.2174/1874465611205020087 · DOI
  6. Polychronopoulou, 2011, Ceria-Based Materials for Hydrogen Production Via Hydrocarbon Steam Reforming and Water-Gas Shift Reactions, Recent Pat. Mater. Sci., 4, 122, 10.2174/1874465611104020122 · DOI
  7. Varghese, 2020, CO2 capture adsorbents functionalized by amine–bearing polymers: A review, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 96, 103005, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103005 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gunawan, 2018, Adsorption–desorption of CO 2 on zeolite-Y-templated carbon at various temperatures, RSC Adv., 8, 41594, 10.1039/C8RA09200A · DOI
  9. Hu, 2019, CO 2 Capture in Metal-Organic Framework Adsorbents: An Engineering Perspective, Adv. Sustain. Syst., 3, 1800080, 10.1002/adsu.201800080 · DOI
  10. Kim, 2017, Sol-gel Synthesis of MgAl2O4-stabilized CaO for CO2 Capture, Energy Procedia, 114, 220, 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1164 · DOI
  11. Broda, 2014, Sol–gel-derived, CaO-based, ZrO2-stabilized CO2 sorbents, Fuel, 127, 94, 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.004 · DOI
  12. Varghese, 2020, Performance enhancement of CO2 capture adsorbents by UV treatment: The case of self-supported graphene oxide foam, Chem. Eng. J., 386, 124022, 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124022 · DOI
  13. Ursua, 2012, Hydrogen Production From Water Electrolysis: Current Status and Future Trends, Proc. IEEE, 100, 410, 10.1109/JPROC.2011.2156750 · DOI
  14. Ampelli, 2014, A sustainable production of h2 by water splitting and photo-reforming of organic wastes on Au/TiO2nanotube arrays, Chem. Eng. Trans., 39, 1627
  15. Zhang, B., Wang, L., and Li, R. (2019). Bioconversion and Chemical Conversion of Biogas for Fuel Production. Advanced Bioprocessing for Alternative Fuels, Biobased Chemicals, and Bioproducts, Elsevier. · DOI
  16. Rostrup-Nielsen, J.R. (1984). Catalytic Steam Reforming, Springer. · DOI
  17. García, L. (2015). Hydrogen production by steam reforming of natural gas and other nonrenewable feedstocks. Compendium of Hydrogen Energy, Elsevier. · DOI
  18. Melo, 2005, Naphtha steam reforming for hydrogen production, Catal. Today, 107–108, 458, 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.028 · DOI
  19. Nabgan, 2016, Hydrogen production from catalytic steam reforming of phenol with bimetallic nickel-cobalt catalyst on various supports, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 527, 161, 10.1016/j.apcata.2016.08.033 · DOI
  20. Hou, 2015, Hydrogen production from ethanol reforming: Catalysts and reaction mechanism, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 44, 132, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.023 · DOI
  21. Polychronopoulou, 2004, The steam reforming of phenol reaction over supported-Rh catalysts, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 272, 37, 10.1016/j.apcata.2004.05.002 · DOI
  22. Polychronopoulou, 2004, The phenol steam reforming reaction over MgO-based supported Rh catalysts, J. Catal., 228, 417, 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.09.016 · DOI
  23. Polychronopoulou, 2006, Absorption-enhanced reforming of phenol by steam over supported Fe catalysts, J. Catal., 241, 132, 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.04.015 · DOI
  24. 2004, Steam reforming of hydrocarbons. A historical perspective, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 147, 121, 10.1016/S0167-2991(04)80038-7 · DOI
  25. Boyano, 2012, Conventional and advanced exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming reactor for hydrogen production, J. Clean. Prod., 20, 152, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.027 · DOI
  26. Wang, 2004, Highly active and stable Rh/MgOAl2O3 catalysts for methane steam reforming, Catal. Today, 98, 575, 10.1016/j.cattod.2004.09.011 · DOI
  27. Matsumura, 2004, Steam reforming of methane over nickel catalysts at low reaction temperature, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 258, 107, 10.1016/j.apcata.2003.08.009 · DOI
  28. Chen, 2019, 3D printing of ceramics: A review, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 39, 661, 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013 · DOI
  29. Sachs, 1992, Three Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from a CAD Model, J. Eng. Ind., 114, 481, 10.1115/1.2900701 · DOI
  30. Duda, 2016, 3D Metal Printing Technology, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49, 103, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.111 · DOI
  31. Huang, 1987, The effect of catalyst preparation on catalytic activity, Appl. Catal., 30, 255, 10.1016/S0166-9834(00)84117-2 · DOI
  32. Wang, 2003, Surface structure and catalytic behavior of silica-supported copper catalysts prepared by impregnation and sol–gel methods, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 239, 87, 10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00421-0 · DOI
  33. Sewell, 1996, TPR Study on the Preparation of Impregnated Co/SiO2Catalysts, J. Catal., 162, 220, 10.1006/jcat.1996.0279 · DOI
  34. Qi, 2004, MnOx-CeO2 mixed oxides prepared by co-precipitation for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 at low temperatures, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 51, 93, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.01.023 · DOI
  35. Li, 2006, Comparison of reducibility and stability of alumina-supported Ni catalysts prepared by impregnation and co-precipitation, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 301, 16, 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.11.013 · DOI
  36. Farhadi, 2010, Spinel-type zinc aluminate (ZnAl2O4) nanoparticles prepared by the co-precipitation method: A novel, green and recyclable heterogeneous catalyst for the acetylation of amines, alcohols and phenols under solvent-free conditions, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 382, 293, 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.05.005 · DOI
  37. Sun, 2007, Preparation of well-adhered γ-Al2O3 washcoat on metallic wire mesh monoliths by electrophoretic deposition, Appl. Surf. Sci., 253, 3303, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.07.044 · DOI
  38. Nedyalkova, 2009, Electrophoretic deposition of Co–Me/ZnO (Me=Mn,Fe) ethanol steam reforming catalysts on stainless steel plates, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 34, 2591, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.01.050 · DOI
  39. Cundy, 1998, Microwave Techniques in the Synthesis and Modification of Zeolite Catalysts. A Review, Collect. Czechoslov. Chem. Commun., 63, 1699, 10.1135/cccc19981699 · DOI
  40. Montoya, 2000, Methane reforming with CO2 over Ni/ZrO2–CeO2 catalysts prepared by sol–gel, Catal. Today, 63, 71, 10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00447-8 · DOI
  41. Serp, 2002, Chemical Vapor Deposition Methods for the Controlled Preparation of Supported Catalytic Materials, Chem. Rev., 102, 3085, 10.1021/cr9903508 · DOI
  42. Lu, 2013, Synthesis and Stabilization of Supported Metal Catalysts by Atomic Layer Deposition, Acc. Chem. Res., 46, 1806, 10.1021/ar300229c · DOI
  43. Serp, 2010, Catalysis in Carbon Nanotubes, ChemCatChem, 2, 41, 10.1002/cctc.200900283 · DOI
  44. Meille, 2006, Review on methods to deposit catalysts on structured surfaces, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 315, 1, 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.08.031 · DOI
  45. Hod Lipson, M.K. (2012). Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing, Wiley.
  46. Kodama, 1981, Automatic method for fabricating a three-dimensional plastic model with photo-hardening polymer, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 52, 1770, 10.1063/1.1136492 · DOI
  47. Soliman, 2018, Nature-Inspired Lightweight Cellular Co-Continuous Composites with Architected Periodic Gyroidal Structures, Adv. Eng. Mater., 20, 1
  48. Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., and Tran, P. (2020). FDM-Based 3D Printing of Polymer and Associated Composite: A Review on Mechanical Properties, Defects and Treatments. Polymers (Basel), 12. · DOI
  49. Wohlers Associates (2019). Wohlers Report 2019, Wohlers. · DOI
  50. Rengier, 2010, 3D printing based on imaging data: Review of medical applications, Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., 5, 335, 10.1007/s11548-010-0476-x · DOI
  51. Yang, 2018, 3D Printing of Flexible Electronic Devices, Small Methods, 2, 1700259, 10.1002/smtd.201700259 · DOI
  52. Bassoli, 2007, 3D printing technique applied to rapid casting, Rapid Prototyp. J., 13, 148, 10.1108/13552540710750898 · DOI
  53. Drinkwater, 2016, 3D printed components with ultrasonically arranged microscale structure, Smart Mater. Struct., 25, 02LT01, 10.1088/0964-1726/25/2/02LT01 · DOI
  54. Ho, 2015, 3D printed microfluidics for biological applications, Lab Chip, 15, 3627, 10.1039/C5LC00685F · DOI
  55. Mirzaee, M., Noghanian, S., Wiest, L., and Chang, I. (2015, January 19–25). Developing flexible 3D printed antenna using conductive ABS materials. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada. · DOI
  56. Thakkar, 2017, 3D-Printed Metal–Organic Framework Monoliths for Gas Adsorption Processes, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 9, 35908, 10.1021/acsami.7b11626 · DOI
  57. Zhang, 2020, A 3D-printing method of fabrication for metals, ceramics, and multi-materials using a universal self-curable technique for robocasting, Mater. Horizons, 7, 1083, 10.1039/C9MH01690B · DOI
  58. Thakkar, 2016, 3D-Printed Zeolite Monoliths for CO 2 Removal from Enclosed Environments, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8, 27753, 10.1021/acsami.6b09647 · DOI
  59. Michorczyk, 2016, Preparation of monolithic catalysts using 3D printed templates for oxidative coupling of methane, J. Mater. Chem. A, 4, 18753, 10.1039/C6TA08629B · DOI
  60. Low, 2017, Perspective on 3D printing of separation membranes and comparison to related unconventional fabrication techniques, J. Membr. Sci., 523, 596, 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.006 · DOI
  61. Stuecker, 2004, Advanced Support Structures for Enhanced Catalytic Activity, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43, 51, 10.1021/ie030291v · DOI
  62. Lefevere, 2013, The benefit of design of support architectures for zeolite coated structured catalysts for methanol-to-olefin conversion, Catal. Today, 216, 18, 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.05.020 · DOI
  63. Schroeven, 2012, Ceramic processing techniques for catalyst design: Formation, properties, and catalytic example of ZSM-5 on 3-dimensional fiber deposition support structures, Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 9, 902, 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02781.x · DOI
  64. Danaci, 2016, Efficient CO2 methanation over Ni/Al2O3 coated structured catalysts, Catal. Today, 273, 234, 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.04.019 · DOI
  65. Achille, 2018, 3D printing in chemical engineering and catalytic technology: Structured catalysts, mixers and reactors, Chem. Soc. Rev., 47, 209, 10.1039/C7CS00631D · DOI
  66. Rueda, 2017, Three dimensional printing of components and functional devices for energy and environmental applications, Energy Environ. Sci., 10, 846, 10.1039/C6EE03526D · DOI
  67. Ambrosi, 2016, 3D-printing technologies for electrochemical applications, Chem. Soc. Rev., 45, 2740, 10.1039/C5CS00714C · DOI
  68. Kitson, 2016, 3D printing of versatile reactionware for chemical synthesis, Nat. Protoc., 11, 920, 10.1038/nprot.2016.041 · DOI
  69. Martin, 2017, 3D printing of high-strength aluminium alloys, Nature, 549, 365, 10.1038/nature23894 · DOI
  70. Maier, 2007, Combinatorial and High-Throughput Materials Science, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 46, 6016, 10.1002/anie.200603675 · DOI
  71. Smay, 2002, Colloidal Inks for Directed Assembly of 3-D Periodic Structures, Langmuir, 18, 5429, 10.1021/la0257135 · DOI
  72. Miranda, 2006, Sintering and robocasting of β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for orthopaedic applications, Acta Biomater., 2, 457, 10.1016/j.actbio.2006.02.004 · DOI
  73. Eqtesadi, 2013, A simple recipe for direct writing complex 45S5 Bioglass® 3D scaffolds, Mater. Lett., 93, 68, 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.11.043 · DOI
  74. Zhou, 2017, Three-dimensional Printing for Catalytic Applications: Current Status and Perspectives, Adv. Funct. Mater., 27, 1701134, 10.1002/adfm.201701134 · DOI
  75. Johnson, 2012, Chemical creativity with 3D printing, Nat. Chem., 4, 338, 10.1038/nchem.1333 · DOI
  76. Sun, 2015, An Overview of 3D Printing Technologies for Food Fabrication, Food Bioprocess Technol., 8, 1605, 10.1007/s11947-015-1528-6 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Wei, 2016, Printable hybrid hydrogel by dual enzymatic polymerization with superactivity, Chem. Sci., 7, 2748, 10.1039/C5SC02234G · DOI
  78. Hurt, 2017, Combining additive manufacturing and catalysis: A review, Catal. Sci. Technol., 7, 3421, 10.1039/C7CY00615B · DOI
  79. Hussain, 2019, Design and development of a lightweight SLS 3D printer with a controlled heating mechanism: Part A, Int. J. Light. Mater. Manuf., 2, 373
  80. Walkowiak, 2018, Design and control of system for elbow rehabilitation: Preliminary findings, Adv. Clin. Exp. Med., 27, 1661, 10.17219/acem/74556 · DOI
  81. Vulcaman (2020, June 08). DIY-SLS-3D-Printer. Instructables Workshop. Available online: https://www.instructables.com/id/DIY-SLS-3D-Printer/.
  82. Hoy, 2013, 3D Printing: Making Things at the Library, Med. Ref. Serv. Q., 32, 93, 10.1080/02763869.2013.749139 · DOI
  83. Melchels, 2010, A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering, Biomaterials, 31, 6121, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 · DOI
  84. Yap, 2015, Review of selective laser melting: Materials and applications, Appl. Phys. Rev., 2, 041101, 10.1063/1.4935926 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Ioannou, 2010, Analytical model for geometrical characteristics control of laser sintered surfaces, Int. J. Nanomanuf., 6, 300, 10.1504/IJNM.2010.034792 · DOI
  86. Koo, J.H., Ortiz, R., Ong, B., and Wu, H. (2017). Polymer nanocomposites for laser additive manufacturing. Laser Additive Manufacturing, Elsevier. · DOI
  87. Naboychenko, N.A.Y.S. (2018). Handbook of Non-Ferrous Metal Powders. Handbook of Non-Ferrous Metal Powders, Elsevier. [2nd ed.].
  88. Ashok, 2011, Stainless Steel As a Catalyst for the Total Deoxygenation of Glycerol and Levulinic Acid in Aqueous Acidic Medium, ACS Catal., 1, 355, 10.1021/cs200053h · DOI
  89. Sang, 2012, Catalytic reforming of methane with CO2 over metal foam based monolithic catalysts, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 37, 13037, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.056 · DOI
  90. Elias, 2015, A porous structured reactor for hydrogenation reactions, Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif., 95, 175, 10.1016/j.cep.2015.05.012 · DOI
  91. Saggiomo, V. (2020). 3D Printed Devices for Catalytic Systems. Catalyst Immobilization, Wiley. · DOI
  92. Marikkannan, 2013, Synthesis, characterisation and sintering behaviour influencing the mechanical, thermal and physical properties of cordierite-doped TiO2, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2, 269, 10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.03.016 · DOI
  93. Ogihara, 2009, High-Energy Density Capacitors Utilizing 0.7 BaTiO 3 -0.3 BiScO 3 Ceramics, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 92, 1719, 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03104.x · DOI
  94. Eckel, 2016, Additive manufacturing of polymer-derived ceramics, Science (80-.), 351, 58, 10.1126/science.aad2688 · DOI
  95. Spoerk, 2018, Effect of the printing bed temperature on the adhesion of parts produced by fused filament fabrication, Plast. Rubber Compos., 47, 17, 10.1080/14658011.2017.1399531 · DOI
  96. Choi, 2016, Influence of Bed Temperature on Heat Shrinkage Shape Error in FDM Additive Manufacturing of the ABS-Engineering Plastic, World J. Eng. Technol., 4, 186, 10.4236/wjet.2016.43D022 · DOI
  97. Mostafaei, A., Elliott, A.M., Barnes, J.E., Li, F., Tan, W., Cramer, C.L., Nandwana, P., and Chmielus, M. (2020). Binder jet 3D printing–Process parameters, materials, properties, and challenges. Prog. Mater. Sci., 100707. · DOI
  98. Li, 2018, Mechanism of heat affected zone cracking in Ni-based superalloy DZ125L fabricated by laser 3D printing technique, Mater. Des., 150, 171, 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.032 · DOI
  99. Lederle, 2016, Improved mechanical properties of 3D-printed parts by fused deposition modeling processed under the exclusion of oxygen, Prog. Addit. Manuf., 1, 3, 10.1007/s40964-016-0010-y · DOI
  100. Azuaje, 2016, 3D printing of a heterogeneous copper-based catalyst, J. Catal., 334, 110, 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.11.019 · DOI
  101. Arin, 2013, Low temperature deposition of TiO2 layers from nanoparticle containing suspensions synthesized by microwave hydrothermal treatment, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 66, 100, 10.1007/s10971-013-2972-2 · DOI
  102. Arin, 2012, Deposition of photocatalytically active TiO2 films by inkjet printing of TiO2 nanoparticle suspensions obtained from microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis, Nanotechnology, 23, 165603, 10.1088/0957-4484/23/16/165603 · DOI
  103. Taylor, 2017, Iron and Nickel Cellular Structures by Sintering of 3D-Printed Oxide or Metallic Particle Inks, Adv. Eng. Mater., 19, 1600365, 10.1002/adem.201600365 · DOI
  104. Couck, 2017, CO2, CH4 and N2 separation with a 3DFD-printed ZSM-5 monolith, Chem. Eng. J., 308, 719, 10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.046 · DOI
  105. Kramer, 2018, Additive Manufacturing of Catalyst Substrates for Steam–Methane Reforming, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 27, 21, 10.1007/s11665-017-2859-4 · DOI
  106. Siakavelas, G., Charisiou, N., Alkhoori, S., Alkhoori, A., Sebastian, V., Hinder, S., Baker, M., Yentekakis, I.V., Polychronopoulou, K., and Goula, M.A. (2020). Highly selective and stable nickel catalysts supported on ceria promoted with Sm2O3, Pr2O3 and MgO for the CO2 methanation. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 119562. · DOI
  107. Basina, G., Polychronopoulou, K., Zedan, A.F., Dimos, K., Katsiotis, M.S., Fotopoulos, A.P., Ismail, I., and Tzitzios, V. (2020). Ultrasmall Metal-Doped CeO 2 Nanoparticles for Low-Temperature CO Oxidation. ACS Appl. Nano Mater., acsanm.0c02090. · DOI
  108. Zhu, 2018, Toward digitally controlled catalyst architectures: Hierarchical nanoporous gold via 3D printing, Sci. Adv., 4, eaas9459, 10.1126/sciadv.aas9459 · DOI
  109. Elkoro, 2019, 3D printed microstructured Au/TiO2 catalyst for hydrogen photoproduction, Appl. Mater. Today, 16, 265, 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.06.007 · DOI
  110. Kitson, 2013, Combining 3D printing and liquid handling to produce user-friendly reactionware for chemical synthesis and purification, Chem. Sci., 4, 3099, 10.1039/C3SC51253C · DOI
  111. Skorski, 2016, The chemical, mechanical, and physical properties of 3D printed materials composed of TiO 2 -ABS nanocomposites, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 17, 89, 10.1080/14686996.2016.1152879 · DOI
  112. Sun, 2018, Direct 3D Printing of Reactive Agitating Impellers for the Convenient Treatment of Various Pollutants in Water, Adv. Mater. Interfaces, 5, 1701626, 10.1002/admi.201701626 · DOI
  113. Wang, 2015, Three-dimensional Printed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Framework Coated with Cu-BTC Metal-organic Frameworks for the Removal of Methylene Blue, Sci. Rep., 4, 5939, 10.1038/srep05939 · DOI
  114. Carbajales, 2018, Three-Dimensional Printing in Catalysis: Combining 3D Heterogeneous Copper and Palladium Catalysts for Multicatalytic Multicomponent Reactions, ACS Catal., 8, 392, 10.1021/acscatal.7b02592 · DOI
  115. Yee, 2017, Functionalized 3D Architected Materials via Thiol-Michael Addition and Two-Photon Lithography, Adv. Mater., 29, 1605293, 10.1002/adma.201605293 · DOI
  116. Wei, 2020, Metal 3D printing technology for functional integration of catalytic system, Nat. Commun., 11, 4098, 10.1038/s41467-020-17941-8 · DOI
  117. Fratalocchi, 2020, Adoption of 3D printed highly conductive periodic open cellular structures as an effective solution to enhance the heat transfer performances of compact Fischer-Tropsch fixed-bed reactors, Chem. Eng. J., 386, 123988, 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123988 · DOI
  118. Kim, 2018, A review on quality control in additive manufacturing, Rapid Prototyp. J., 24, 645, 10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0048 · DOI
  119. Townsend, 2016, Surface texture metrology for metal additive manufacturing: A review, Precis. Eng., 46, 34, 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.001 · DOI
  120. Slotwinski, 2015, Metrology Needs for Metal Additive Manufacturing Powders, JOM, 67, 538, 10.1007/s11837-014-1290-7 · DOI
  121. Lyckfeldt, 2013, Powder Rheology of Steel Powders for Additive Manufacturing, Swerea IVF AB, 2, 225
  122. Starr, 2012, Controlling phase composition in selective laser melted stainless steels, Powder (W), 195, 195
  123. Murr, 2012, Microstructures and Properties of 17-4 PH Stainless Steel Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 1, 167, 10.1016/S2238-7854(12)70029-7 · DOI
  124. Edwards, 2013, Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Components: Properties and Performance, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 135, 061016, 10.1115/1.4025773 · DOI
  125. Galantucci, 2009, Experimental study aiming to enhance the surface finish of fused deposition modeled parts, CIRP Ann., 58, 189, 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.071 · DOI
  126. Beard, 2011, Using Raman spectroscopy to monitor surface finish and roughness of components manufactured by selective laser sintering, J. Raman Spectrosc., 42, 744, 10.1002/jrs.2771 · DOI
  127. Calignano, 2013, Influence of process parameters on surface roughness of aluminum parts produced by DMLS, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 67, 2743, 10.1007/s00170-012-4688-9 · DOI
  128. Bergmair, 2015, Nanoimprint Lithography on curved surfaces prepared by fused deposition modelling, Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop., 3, 024003, 10.1088/2051-672X/3/2/024003 · DOI
  129. Safdar, 2012, Effect of process parameters settings and thickness on surface roughness of EBM produced Ti-6Al-4V, Rapid Prototyp. J., 18, 401, 10.1108/13552541211250391 · DOI
  130. Grimm, 2015, Characterization of typical surface effects in additive manufacturing with confocal microscopy, Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop., 3, 014001, 10.1088/2051-672X/3/1/014001 · DOI
  131. Triantaphyllou, 2015, Surface texture measurement for additive manufacturing, Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop., 3, 024002, 10.1088/2051-672X/3/2/024002 · DOI
  132. Temmler, A., Willenborg, E., and Wissenbach, K. (2012). Laser Polishing. Proc. SPIE, 82430W. · DOI
  133. Jamshidinia, 2015, The influence of heat accumulation on the surface roughness in powder-bed additive manufacturing, Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop., 3, 014003, 10.1088/2051-672X/3/1/014003 · DOI
  134. Johnson, M.K., Cole, F., Raj, A., and Adelson, E.H. (2011). Microgeometry capture using an elastomeric sensor. ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Papers on—SIGGRAPH ’11, ACM. · DOI
  135. Johnson, M.K., and Adelson, E.H. (2009, January 20–25). Retrographic sensing for the measurement of surface texture and shape. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami, FL, USA. · DOI
  136. Mumtaz, 2009, Top surface and side roughness of Inconel 625 parts processed using selective laser melting, Rapid Prototyp. J., 15, 96, 10.1108/13552540910943397 · DOI
  137. Kerckhofs, 2013, High-Resolution Microfocus X-Ray Computed Tomography for 3D Surface Roughness Measurements of Additive Manufactured Porous Materials, Adv. Eng. Mater., 15, 153, 10.1002/adem.201200156 · DOI
  138. Pyka, 2013, Surface Roughness and Morphology Customization of Additive Manufactured Open Porous Ti6Al4V Structures, Materials (Basel), 6, 4737, 10.3390/ma6104737 · DOI
  139. Tofail, 2018, Additive manufacturing: Scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities, Mater. Today, 21, 22, 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 · DOI
  140. Zocca, 2015, Additive Manufacturing of Ceramics: Issues, Potentialities, and Opportunities, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 98, 1983, 10.1111/jace.13700 · DOI
  141. Travitzky, 2014, Additive Manufacturing of Ceramic-Based Materials, Adv. Eng. Mater., 16, 729, 10.1002/adem.201400097 · DOI
  142. Santoliquido, 2017, Additive manufacturing of periodic ceramic substrates for automotive catalyst supports, Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 14, 1164, 10.1111/ijac.12745 · DOI
  143. Jung, 2005, Fluid permeabilities of triply periodic minimal surfaces, Phys. Rev. E, 72, 056319, 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.056319 · DOI
  144. Sreedhar, 2018, Mass transfer analysis of ultrafiltration using spacers based on triply periodic minimal surfaces: Effects of spacer design, directionality and voidage, J. Memb. Sci., 561, 89, 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.028 · DOI
  145. Torquato, 2004, Minimal surfaces and multifunctionality, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 460, 1849, 10.1098/rspa.2003.1269 · DOI
  146. Abueidda, 2015, Finite element predictions of effective multifunctional properties of interpenetrating phase composites with novel triply periodic solid shell architectured reinforcements, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 92, 80, 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.12.004 · DOI
  147. Aldrich, 2000, Processing, microstructure, and physical properties of interpenetrating Al 2 O 3 /Ni composites, Mater. Sci. Technol., 16, 747, 10.1179/026708300101508748 · DOI
  148. Chen, 2011, Preparation, microstructure and deformation behavior of Zr-based metallic glass/porous SiC interpenetrating phase composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 530, 15, 10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.063 · DOI
  149. Marchi, 2003, Alumina–aluminum interpenetrating-phase composites with three-dimensional periodic architecture, Scr. Mater., 49, 861, 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00441-X · DOI
  150. Nash, 2007, Co-continuous composites for high-temperature applications, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 463, 115, 10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.162 · DOI
  151. Rowshan, 2017, Mechanical Properties of a New Type of Architected Interpenetrating Phase Composite Materials, Adv. Mater. Technol., 2, 1600235, 10.1002/admt.201600235 · DOI
  152. Pelanconi, 2019, Additive manufacturing of architected catalytic ceramic substrates based on triply periodic minimal surfaces, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 102, 6176, 10.1111/jace.16474 · DOI
  153. Niya, A.A. (2017). Novel Adsorbents for Natural Gas Separation and Purification. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Queensland].
  154. Lawson, 2020, Development of 3D-Printed Polymer-MOF Monoliths for CO 2 Adsorption, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 59, 7151, 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05445 · DOI
  155. Wang, 2019, Fabricating Mechanically Robust Binder-Free Structured Zeolites by 3D Printing Coupled with Zeolite Soldering: A Superior Configuration for CO 2 Capture, Adv. Sci., 6, 1901317, 10.1002/advs.201901317 · DOI
  156. Dunne, 1996, Calorimetric Heats of Adsorption and Adsorption Isotherms. 2. O 2, N 2, Ar, CO 2, CH 4, C 2 H 6, and SF 6 on NaX, H-ZSM-5, and Na-ZSM-5 Zeolites, Langmuir, 12, 5896, 10.1021/la960496r · DOI
  157. Khelifa, 2004, Adsorption of carbon dioxide by X zeolites exchanged with Ni2+ and Cr3+: Isotherms and isosteric heat, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 278, 9, 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.05.033 · DOI
  158. Middelkoop, 2019, 3D printed versus spherical adsorbents for gas sweetening, Chem. Eng. J., 357, 309, 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.130 · DOI
  159. Lopes, 2009, Adsorption of H 2, CO 2, CH 4, CO, N 2 and H 2 O in Activated Carbon and Zeolite for Hydrogen Production, Sep. Sci. Technol., 44, 1045, 10.1080/01496390902729130 · DOI
  160. Garshasbi, 2017, Equilibrium CO2 adsorption on zeolite 13X prepared from natural clays, Appl. Surf. Sci., 393, 225, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.161 · DOI
  161. Lawson, 2020, The effects of cell density and intrinsic porosity on structural properties and adsorption kinetics in 3D-printed zeolite monoliths, Chem. Eng. Sci., 218, 115564, 10.1016/j.ces.2020.115564 · DOI
  162. Hu, 2014, Diffusion mechanism of CO2 in 13X zeolite beads, Adsorption, 20, 121, 10.1007/s10450-013-9554-z · DOI
  163. Balat, 2008, Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 33, 4013, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.047 · DOI
  164. Zheng, 2020, Methanol steam reforming microreactor with novel 3D-Printed porous stainless steel support as catalyst support, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 45, 14006, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.103 · DOI
  165. Azuaje, 2017, An efficient and recyclable 3D printed α-Al 2 O 3 catalyst for the multicomponent assembly of bioactive heterocycles, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 530, 203, 10.1016/j.apcata.2016.11.031 · DOI
  166. Danaci, 2019, Scaling up of 3D printed and Ni/Al2O3 coated reactors for CO2 methanation, React. Chem. Eng., 4, 1318, 10.1039/C9RE00092E · DOI
  167. Luyten, 2010, Designing with Pores-Synthesis and Applications, KONA Powder Part. J., 28, 131, 10.14356/kona.2010012 · DOI
  168. Zamaniyan, 2010, Tube fitted bulk monolithic catalyst as novel structured reactor for gas–solid reactions, Appl. Catal. A Gen., 385, 214, 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.07.014 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Soliman, A., AlAmoodi, N., Karanikolos, G. N., Doumanidis, C. C., & Polychronopoulou, K.
Affiliations
  • Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
  • VinUniversity (VN)
Corresponding author
Polychronopoulou, Kyriaki
ORCID
Venue
Nanomaterials
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-04
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
2198
ISSN
2079-4991 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/nano10112198
PMC
PMC7693986
OpenAlex
W3097802627
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nanomaterials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Khalifa University (RC2-2018-024)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
3D printing, additive manufacturing, catalysis, CO2 adsorption, CO2 capture, reforming reactions, gas separation, heat and mass transfer, surface area enhancement, porous media, carbon emission reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review