Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Logistic LASSO Regression for Dietary Intakes and Breast Cancer

Open access
McEligot, Archana J., Poynor, Valerie, Sharma, Rishabh, Panangadan, Anand·2020·Nutrients

Abstract

A multitude of dietary factors from dietary fat to macro and micronutrients intakes have been associated with breast cancer, yet data are still equivocal. Therefore, utilizing data from the large, multi-year, cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we applied a novel, modern statistical shrinkage technique, logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, to examine the association between dietary intakes in women, ≥50 years, with self-reported breast cancer (n = 286) compared with women without self-reported breast cancer (1144) from the 1999–2010 NHANES cycle. Logistic LASSO regression was used to examine the relationship between twenty-nine variables, including dietary variables from food, as well as well-established/known breast cancer risk factors, and to subsequently identify the most relevant variables associated with self-reported breast cancer. We observed that as the penalty factor (λ) increased in the logistic LASSO regression, well-established breast cancer risk factors, including age (β = 0.83) and parity (β = −0.05) remained in the model. For dietary macro and micronutrient intakes, only vitamin B12 (β = 0.07) was positively associated with self-reported breast cancer. Caffeine (β = −0.01) and alcohol (β = 0.03) use also continued to remain in the model. These data suggest that a diet high in vitamin B12, as well as alcohol use may be associated with self-reported breast cancer. Nonetheless, additional prospective studies should apply more recent statistical techniques to dietary data and cancer outcomes to replicate and confirm the present findings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu12092652

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lee, 2016, A modified local quadratic approximation algorithm for penalized optimization problems, Comput Stat. Data Anal., 94, 275, 10.1016/j.csda.2015.08.019 · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2015.08.019
  2. Sineshaw, 2014, Association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer subtypes in the National Cancer Data Base (2010–2011), Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 145, 753, 10.1007/s10549-014-2976-9 · doi:10.1007/s10549-014-2976-9
  3. Hunter, 1992, A prospective study of caffeine, coffee, tea, and breast cancer, Am. J. Epidemiol., 136, 1000
  4. Bassett, 2013, Dietary intake of B vitamins and methionine and breast cancer risk, Cancer Causes Control, 24, 1555, 10.1007/s10552-013-0232-y · doi:10.1007/s10552-013-0232-y

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
McEligot, A. J., Poynor, V., Sharma, R., & Panangadan, A.
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-08-31
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
2652
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3081692890
Cited by
312
References
62
FWCI
31.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1R25MD010397-01)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Logistic LASSO Regression for Dietary Intakes and Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/nu12092652
The paper
McEligot, A. J., Poynor, V., Sharma, R., & Panangadan, A. (2020). Logistic LASSO Regression for Dietary Intakes and Breast Cancer. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092652

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.