Cited by 8Gene expression and cancer classificationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Classifiers for predicting coronary artery disease based on gene expression profiles in peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Open access
Liu, Jie, Wang, Xiaodong, Lin, Junhua, Li, Shaohua, Deng, Guoxiong, Wei, Jinru·2021·International Journal of General Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a serious global health concern. Current diagnostic methods for CAD involve risk to the patient and are costly, so better diagnostic tools are needed. We defined four classifiers based on gene expression profiles in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and determined their potential for CAD detection. METHODS: We downloaded a CAD-related data set (GSE113079) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells between CAD samples and healthy controls. DEGs were analyzed for functional enrichment. To create a robust CAD classifier, DEGs were identified by feature selection using the principal component analysis. Then, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machine (SVM) models were created. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) score and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were also conducted. The performance of the models was evaluated in terms of the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). RESULTS: In the training set, we found 135 up-regulated genes and 104 down-regulated genes in CAD patients compared with controls. The DEGs were involved in some pathways associated with CAD, such as pathways involving calcium and interleukin-17 signaling. Twenty genes were identified as optimal features and used to generate the logistic classifier based on LASSO. The AUC for the classifier was 1.00 in the training set and 0.997 in the test set. Using the 20 DEGs, SVM and random forest classifiers were also generated and showed high diagnostic efficacy, with respective AUCs of 0.997 and 1.00 against the training set. A GSVA score was also established using the top 20 significant DEGs, which showed an AUC of 0.971 in the training set and 0.989 in the test set. Furthermore, GSEA showed autophagy and the proteasome to be major pathways involving the DEGs. CONCLUSION: We identified a set of genes specific for CAD whose expression can be measured non-invasively. Using these genes, we defined four diagnostic classifiers using multiple methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ijgm.s329005

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, J., Wang, X., Lin, J., Li, S., Deng, G., & Wei, J.
Affiliations
Guangxi Medical University (CN)
Venue
International Journal of General Medicine
Published
2021-09
Volume
Volume 14
Pages
5651-5663
ISSN
1178-7074 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199326502
Cited by
8
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of General Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
coronary artery disease, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, gene expression profiling, diagnostic classifier, differentially expressed genes, LASSO logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, gene set enrichment analysis, autophagy, proteasome, calcium signaling, IL-17 signaling, non-invasive diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review