Cited by 25Celiac Disease Research and ManagementDietetics, Nutrition, and EducationChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expanded Role of a Dietitian in Monitoring a Gluten-Free Diet in Patients with Celiac Disease: Implications for Clinical Practice

Open access

Abstract

Access to a registered dietitian experienced in celiac disease (CD) is still limited, and consultation when available focuses primarily on the elimination of gluten from the diet. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the nutritional value of a gluten-free diet (GFD) in adult CD patients before, and one year after, the standard dietary education. The study included 72 CD patients on a GFD and 30 healthy controls. The dietary intake of both groups was assessed through a 3-day food diary, while adherence to a GFD in celiac subjects was assessed using Standardized Dietician Evaluation (SDE). Subsequently, all CD patients received detailed education on gluten sources, and 48 of them participated in a one-year follow-up. Results: Comparison with the control group showed that consumption of plant protein in CD patients was significantly lower, whereas fat and calories were higher. At baseline, only 62% of CD patients adhered to a GFD, but the standard dietary education successfully improved it. However, the nutritional value of a GFD after one year did not change, except for a reduced sodium intake. The CD subjects still did not consume enough calcium, iron, vitamin D, folic acid or fiber. In conclusion, while the standard dietary education improved GFD adherence, it did not significantly alter its nutritional value. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the role of a dietitian in the treatment of CD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu13061859

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Asri, 2020, Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Celiac Disease, Middle East J. Dig. Dis., 12, 229
  2. Kupper, 2005, Dietary guidelines and implementation for celiac disease, Gastroenterology, 128, S121, 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.024 · DOI
  3. Leffler, 2015, Extraintestinal manifestations of coeliac disease, Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 12, 561, 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.131 · DOI
  4. Melini, V., and Melini, F. (2019). Gluten-Free Diet: Gaps and Needs for a Healthier Diet. Nutrients, 15. · DOI
  5. Schuchardt, 2017, Intestinal Absorption and Factors Influencing Bioavailability of Magnesium-An Update, Curr. Nutr. Food Sci., 13, 260, 10.2174/1573401313666170427162740 · DOI
  6. Stasi, 2016, Frequency and Cause of Persistent Symptoms in Celiac Disease Patients on a Long-term Gluten-free Diet, J. Clin. Gastroenterol., 50, 239, 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000392 · DOI
  7. Roos, 2019, Persistent Symptoms in People with Celiac Disease Despite Gluten-Free Diet, Gastroenterol. Nurs., 42, 496, 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000377 · DOI
  8. Ludvigsson, 2014, Diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease: Guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology, Gut, 63, 1210, 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306578 · DOI
  9. Leffler, 2009, A simple validated gluten-free diet adherence survey for adults with celiac disease, Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 7, 530, 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.032 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gładyś, K., Dardzińska, J., Guzek, M., Adrych, K., and Małgorzewicz, S. (2020). Celiac Dietary Adherence Test and Standardized Dietician Evaluation in Assessment of Adherence to a Gluten-Free Diet in Patients with Celiac Disease. Nutrients, 12. · DOI
  11. Hall, 2009, Systematic review: Adherence to a gluten-free diet in adult patients with coeliac disease, Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther., 30, 315, 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04053.x · DOI
  12. Zong, 2018, Gluten intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in three large prospective cohort studies of US men and women, Diabetologia, 61, 2164, 10.1007/s00125-018-4697-9 · DOI
  13. Shepherd, 2013, Nutritional inadequacies of the gluten-free diet in both recently-diagnosed and long-term patients with coeliac disease, J. Hum. Nutr. Diet., 26, 349, 10.1111/jhn.12018 · DOI
  14. Freeman, 2017, Dietary compliance in celiac disease, World J. Gastroenterol., 23, 2635, 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2635 · DOI
  15. Zuccotti, 2013, Intakes of nutrients in Italian children with celiac disease and the role of commercially available gluten-free products, J. Hum. Nutr. Diet., 26, 436, 10.1111/jhn.12026 · DOI
  16. Sue, 2018, Paediatric Patients with Coeliac Disease on a Gluten-Free Diet: Nutritional Adequacy and Macro- and Micronutrient Imbalances, Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep., 20, 2, 10.1007/s11894-018-0606-0 · DOI
  17. Rai, 2018, Gluten-Free Products for Celiac Susceptible People, Front. Nutr., 5, 116, 10.3389/fnut.2018.00116 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Mahadev, 2013, Is dietitian use associated with celiac disease outcomes?, Nutrients, 5, 1585, 10.3390/nu5051585 · DOI
  19. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA) (2010). Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for fats, including saturated fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids, and cholesterol. EFSA J., 8, 1461. · DOI
  20. Araszkiewicz, 2020, 2020 Guidelines on the management of diabetic patients. A position of Diabetes Poland, Clin. Diabetol., 9, 1
  21. Rosiak, 2016, Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego [The Consumption of Fats in Poland and the European Union], Natl. Res. Inst., 6, 279
  22. 2020, Pseudocereal grains: Nutritional value, health benefits and current applications for the development of gluten-free foods, Food Chem. Toxicol., 137, 111178, 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111178 · DOI
  23. Pace, 2016, Complex Relationships between Food, Diet, and the Microbiome, Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am., 45, 253, 10.1016/j.gtc.2016.02.004 · DOI
  24. Stazi, 2008, Osteoporosis in celiac disease and in endocrine and reproductive disorders, World J. Gastroenterol., 14, 498, 10.3748/wjg.14.498 · DOI
  25. Shannahan, 2017, Diagnosis and Updates in Celiac Disease, Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am., 27, 79, 10.1016/j.giec.2016.08.011 · DOI
  26. Zingone, 2019, Coeliac disease: No difference in milk and dairy products consumption in comparison with controls, BMJ Nutr. Prev. Health, 2, 39, 10.1136/bmjnph-2018-000022 · DOI
  27. Mitchell, 2019, Not All Grains Are Created Equal: Gluten-Free Products Not Included in Mandatory Folate Fortification, Curr. Dev. Nutr., 3, nzz020, 10.1093/cdn/nzz020 · DOI
  28. Herman, 2012, Patients with celiac disease are not followed up adequately, Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 10, 893, 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.007 · DOI
  29. Muhammad, H., Reeves, S., Ishaq, S., and Jeanes, Y. (2020). Interventions to Increase Adherence to a Gluten Free Diet in Patients with Coeliac Disease: A Scoping Review. Gastrointest. Disord., 2. · DOI
  30. Siniscalchi, 2020, COVID-19 pandemic perception in adults with celiac disease: An impulse to implement the use of telemedicine, Dig. Liver Dis., 52, 1071, 10.1016/j.dld.2020.05.014 · DOI
  31. Sainsbury, 2013, A randomized controlled trial of an online intervention to improve gluten-free diet adherence in celiac disease, Am. J. Gastroenterol., 108, 811, 10.1038/ajg.2013.47 · DOI
  32. Jeanes, 2020, Intervention improves knowledge of gluten-free foods and dietary adherence in adults with coeliac disease, Proc. Nutr. Soc., 79, E278, 10.1017/S0029665120002268 · DOI
  33. Muhammad, 2020, Telephone clinic improves gluten-free dietary adherence in adults with coeliac disease: Sustained at 6 months, Frontline Gastroenterol., 2, 318

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gładyś, K., Dardzińska, J., Guzek, M., Adrych, K., Kochan, Z., & Małgorzewicz, S.
Affiliations
Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Corresponding author
Gładyś, Katarzyna
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-05-29
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
1859
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165756547
Cited by
25
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
celiac disease, gluten-free diet, dietitian role, nutrition education, dietary adherence, nutritional status, macronutrient intake, micronutrient deficiency, calcium, iron, vitamin D, folic acid, dietary fiber, sodium intake, plant proteins
MeSH terms
Adult, Celiac Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Nutritional Status, Nutritive Value, Patient Compliance, Poland, Professional Role, Diet, Gluten-Free, Nutritionists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review